岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (10): 3059-3070.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0578

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    

水下双面真空预压离心模型试验及数值模拟分析

胡利文1, 2,洪义3,王德咏1, 2   

  1. 1. 中交四航工程研究院有限公司,广东 广州 510230;2. 南方海洋科学与工程广东省实验室(珠海),广东 珠海 519082; 3. 浙江大学 建筑工程学院,浙江 杭州 310056
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-09 接受日期:2023-07-10 出版日期:2023-10-13 发布日期:2023-10-16
  • 作者简介:胡利文,男,1971年生,博士,正高级工程师,主要从事地基处理、基坑、边坡及桩基的理论与应用研究。

Centrifuge modelling and numerical analysis on underwater two-way vacuum preloading

HU Li-wen1, 2, HONG Yi3, WANG De-yong1, 2   

  1. 1. CCCC Fourth Harbor Engineering Institute, Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, Guangdong 510230, China; 2. Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, Guangdong 519082, China; 3. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310056, China
  • Received:2023-05-09 Accepted:2023-07-10 Online:2023-10-13 Published:2023-10-16

摘要: 水下双面真空预压既有低位真空比顶部真空更大降低土体内孔隙水压力的特点,又有水下真空预压可以更好利用上覆水荷载的优点。然而双面真空预压目前仅在处理疏浚土时应用,在固结机制和固结行为方面研究尚不深入。为探讨水下双面真空预压的加固特征和加固效果,采用离心模型试验模拟软土在顶部与底部同时受真空联合砂井预压,并利用有限元分析离心模型试验结果,对孔隙水压力和变形进行了比较分析,探讨了水下双面真空预压总水头分布的变化、应力路径的发展,并评价了固结速率。通过试验和分析发现,水下双面真空预压比陆上真空预压有更大的有效预压荷载,砂井能加速土体固结并减少土体最终沉降,加固区中部应力路径基本按K0发展;同时在重力与真空双重作用下,底部孔隙水压力下降值远大于顶部孔隙水压力下降值,加固后期底部为低水头区。上述发现增强了对水下双面真空预压的认识和开发利用。

关键词: 双面真空预压, 水下地基, 离心模型, 数值分析, 固结

Abstract: Underwater two-way vacuum preloading not only reduces more excess pore water pressure comparing to conventional vacuum preloading with vacuum acting only on the top face, but also has the advantage of utilizing the effective load from the overlying water. However, two-way vacuum preloading is currently only applied in the treatment of dredged soil, thus the mechanism and performance of consolidation of two-way vacuum preloading are hardly studied. To explore the consolidation characteristics and efficiency of underwater two-way vacuum preloading, centrifuge modelling has been performed to simulate soft soil subjected to underwater two-way vacuum preloading in collaboration with group sand drains and single sand drain. The finite element method is also used to analyze and compare the results with those from centrifuge modelling test. Variation of pore water pressure and development of deformation are compared. Meanwhile, changes in total head of pore water and stress path of soil element, as well as degree of consolidation are discussed and evaluated. It is found that more effective load can be obtained from underwater two-way vacuum preloading comparing to conventional vacuum preloading, and the rate of consolidation is larger and the ultimate settlement can be reduced in group sand drains zone comparing with single sand drain zone. The stresses for soil in the center of treated zone follow a path close to K0 line. Under the combination effects of vacuum and gravity, the reduction of pore water pressure at the bottom layer is larger than that at the top layer, and it is found that a lower water head exists at the bottom at final consolidation stage in this experiment. These findings may enhance the understanding and practical application for two-way vacuum preloading.

Key words: two-way vacuum preloading, underwater ground, centrifuge modelling, numerical analysis, consolidation

中图分类号: TU447
[1] 邓其宁, 崔玉龙, 王炯超, 郑俊, 许冲, . 三维边坡稳定性计算的ChatGPT辅助编程方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 322-334.
[2] 鲍树峰, 董志良, 莫海鸿, 张劲文, 于立婷, 刘攀, 刘晓强, 侯明勋, . 浮泥−流泥静态间歇沉降与低压固结沉降计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2763-2772.
[3] 杨爱武, 程姝晓, 梁振振, 华谦谦, 杨少朋. 高含水率吹填土大变形固结与流变叠加效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1977-1987.
[4] 倪睿思, 肖世国, 吴兵, 梁瑶, . 基于非线性井阻的饱和软弱土无砂增压式真空预压分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2160-2172.
[5] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[6] 周波翰, 张文利, 王栋. 球形贯入仪预测超固结土强度的数值研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1303-1309.
[7] 金磊, 李晶晶, 李新明, 孙翰卿, . 柔性边界的有限差分法−离散元法模拟及其对砂土三轴固结排水和不排水剪切特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 980-990.
[8] 徐斌, 陈柯好, 庞锐, . 超固结黏土的剪胀方程及边界面模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 449-456.
[9] FARHAD Jamil, 曾长女, 马媛, SHARAFAT Ali. 初始固结角度对饱和粉质土应变发展的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 527-538.
[10] 陈怀林, 杨涛, 饶云康, 张哲, 吴红刚, 谢江伟, 滕汉卿. 基于分段式滑面应力测试系统的滑面应力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3562-3573.
[11] 詹润涛, 尹晓萌, . 利用时空变化的孔隙水压力测量数据识别固结模型参数[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3315-3328.
[12] 孙宏磊, 徐振恺, 刘斯杰, 蔡袁强, . 考虑土柱发展过程的淤泥真空预压大应变固结计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 133-146.
[13] 许宝龙, 卢萌盟, 刘元杰, 张鑫岩. 多元排水体复合地基固结解析模型和解答[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 73-83.
[14] 刘吉福. 排水固结堤坝稳定分析新方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 106-114.
[15] 郭晓刚, 马垒, 张超, 淦树成, 王华, 甘一雄, 周通, . 软弱基底排土场边坡逆排堆高速率及稳定性控制方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 596-606.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!