岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (11): 3099-3108.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0652

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于连续-非连续分析理论的隧道围岩破坏区判识方法研究

肖明清1, 2,徐晨1, 2,杨剑1, 2,吴佳明1, 2,付晓东3,周永强3   

  1. 1. 中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司,湖北 武汉 430063;2. 水下隧道技术国家地方联合工程研究中心,湖北 武汉 430063; 3. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-24 接受日期:2023-09-10 出版日期:2023-11-28 发布日期:2023-11-28
  • 通讯作者: 周永强,男,1990年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事岩土力学与工程稳定性研究工作。E-mail: yqzhou@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:tsyxmq@163.com
  • 作者简介:肖明清,男,1971年生,博士,正高级工程师,主要从事隧道与地下工程的设计与研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(No. 2021YFB2600400)

Study on the identification method of tunnel surrounding rock failure zone based on continuous discontinuous analysis theory

XIAO Ming-qing1, 2, XU Chen1, 2, YANG Jian1, 2, WU Jia-ming1, 2, FU Xiao-dong3, ZHOU Yong-qiang3   

  1. 1. China Railway Siyuan Survey and Design Group Co., Ltd., Wuhan, Hubei 430063, China; 2. National & Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Underwater Tunneling Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430063, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China
  • Received:2023-05-24 Accepted:2023-09-10 Online:2023-11-28 Published:2023-11-28
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program (2021YFB2600400).

摘要:

准确分析隧道挖破坏区的范围对合理确定支护参数有着重要的指导作用和工程意义,主要围绕连续介质分析方法和以有限元-离散元耦合方法(finite element-discrete element coupling method,简称FDEM)为代表的连续-非连续方法开展了隧道围岩破坏区判识方法研究。研究了连续介质分析方法与FDEM识别围岩破坏的判别标准;将岩体划分为弹性的岩石单元和弹塑性的界面单元,基于等效连续模型的思想,推导了界面单元力学参数与岩石单元及岩体单元力学参数的关系表达式,首次建立这两种方法参数取值的联系,解决了连续-非连续方法取值难的问题;对比了两种方法模拟不同岩性、断面铁路隧道开挖过程中围岩破坏区范围。基于规范中各级围岩的力学参数取值范围,给出了各级围岩下以FDEM中罚参数和断裂能等围岩主要破坏参数的取值范围;FLAC3D为代表的连续介质方法和FDEM两种方法对不同岩性、断面铁路隧道开挖过程模拟结果表明,连续介质方法得出的塑性区和以塑性极限应变得出的破坏区域和连续-非连续方法得出的裂纹扩展区和破坏区在分布范围、形态及破坏形式上基本一致,验证了提出的FDEM围岩破坏参数取值方法是合理可行的。

关键词: 连续-非连续分析方法, FDEM, 隧道, 破坏区识别, 参数取值, 连续介质分析方法

Abstract:

Accurate analyzing the scope of tunnel excavation failure zone has important guidance and engineering significance in determining support parameters reasonably. This study focuses on the identification methods of tunnel surrounding rock failure zone, specifically the continuous medium analysis method and the continuous-discontinuous method represented by the finite element-discrete element coupling method (FDEM). Firstly, the continuous medium analysis method and FDEM identification criteria for surrounding rock failure are studied. Then the rock mass is divided into elastic rock elements and elastic-plastic interface elements. Based on the concept of equivalent continuous model, the relationship between the mechanical parameters of interface elements and rock elements and rock mass element is mathematically derived. The connection between the parameter values of these two methods is established for the first time, resolving the challenge of determining values in the continuous-discontinuous method. Finally, the ranges of surrounding rock failure zones simulated by these two methods during the excavation process of railway tunnels with different lithology and cross-sections are compared. According to the range of mechanical parameters for each level of surrounding rock mass in the specification, the range of values for the main failure parameters of surrounding rock, such as penalty parameter and fracture energy, in FDEM, is given for each level of surrounding rock. The simulation results of railway tunnel excavation with different lithology and cross sections using the continuous medium method represented by FLAC3D and FDEM method show that the plastic zone obtained by the continuous medium method, and the failure zone obtained by the plastic limit strain, as well as the crack growth zone and failure zone obtained by the continuous-discontinuous method, are generally consistent in terms of distribution range, shape and failure mode. The method proposed in this article for determining the failure parameters of surrounding rock in FDEM is verified as reasonable and feasible.

Key words: continuous-discontinuous method, FDEM, tunnel, identification of failure zone, parameter values, continuous medium analysis method

中图分类号: TU 451
[1] 张治国, 李乃义, 牛瑞, 王安源, 朱正国, . 考虑中导洞施工效应的双连拱隧道应力与位移复变函数解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 141-158.
[2] 张治国, 陈胤吉, 朱正国, 魏纲, 孙苗苗, . 软土小曲率盾构隧道开挖诱发黏弹性地层沉降的解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 309-321.
[3] 冉龙洲, 袁松, 王希宝, 张廷彪, 刘德军, 黎良仆, . 考虑围岩−盾体−注浆体−管片相互作用的深埋护盾式隧道掘进机法隧道围岩压力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 366-376.
[4] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[5] 宋利埼, 章敏, 徐筱, 孙静雯, 俞奎, 李昕尧, . 考虑管片接头转动效应的盾构隧道光纤反演分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2483-2494.
[6] 宋牧原, 杨明辉, 陈伟, 卢贤锥, . 基于自注意力-循环神经网络模型的盾构引发的土体沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2613-2625.
[7] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[8] 芮瑞, LIN A H, 杨俊超, 杨硕, . 被动活动门试验中的土拱效应演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1657-1666.
[9] 韩世迎, 王航龙, 彭俊, 朱君星, 王林飞, 潘堃, . 结构面影响深埋隧道硬质围岩岩爆特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1765-1776.
[10] 佘磊, 赵阳, 李炎隆, 李东锋, 宋卿, 郑继光, 陈晨, . 基于隧道掘进机掘进参数的现场岩体力学参数快速估计方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1595-1604.
[11] 武孝天, 姚仰平, 魏然, 崔文杰. 基于统一硬化模型的隧道施工引发土体变形数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 1013-1024.
[12] 俞奎, 章敏, 秦文权, 孙静雯, 张开翔, 宋利埼, . 隧道穿越下埋地管线分布式光纤变形及脱空反演分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 894-904.
[13] 黄明华, 钟煜轩, 陆锦斌, 王克平. 基于非连续地基梁模型的基坑开挖诱发下卧盾构隧道变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 492-504.
[14] 谢立夫, 关振长, 黄明, 丘华生, 许超. 考虑主动铰接的盾构-地层相互作用模型及求解研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3574-3584.
[15] 真嘉捷, 赖丰文, 黄明, 廖清香, 李爽, 段岳强. 基于时序聚类和在线学习的盾构掘进地层智能识别方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3615-3625.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!