岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (12): 3339-3348.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1886

• 基础理论与实验研究 •    下一篇

下伏空洞桥梁群桩桩端岩层极限承载力计算方法研究

雷勇1,陈于斯1,谭豪1,李鹏甲1,刘运思1,于艺林2   

  1. 1. 湖南科技大学 岩土工程稳定控制与健康监测湖南省重点实验室,湖南 湘潭 411201;2. 中建市政工程有限公司,北京 100071
  • 收稿日期:2022-12-02 接受日期:2023-04-06 出版日期:2023-12-20 发布日期:2023-12-21
  • 作者简介:雷勇,男,1983年生,博士,教授,主要从事桩基础及特殊土地基处理方面的教学与研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51878270);湖南省自然科学基金(No.2022JJ30253)。

Calculation method of ultimate bearing capacity for rock layer of pile tip of bridge pile groups with underground karst cave

LEI Yong1, CHEN Yu-si1, TAN Hao1, LI Peng-jia1, LIU Yun-si1, YU Yi-lin2   

  1. 1. Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Engineering for Stability Control and Health Monitoring, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan, Hunan 411201, China; 2. China Construction Municipal Engineering Corporation Limited, Beijing 100071, China
  • Received:2022-12-02 Accepted:2023-04-06 Online:2023-12-20 Published:2023-12-21
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (51878270) and the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province of China (2022JJ30253).

摘要: 为探究下伏空洞桥梁群桩桩端岩层的承载机制和破坏模式,进行了单桩及不同桩数群桩的室内模型试验研究,得到了不同桩数群桩桩端岩层的极限承载力和破坏模式。根据下伏空洞桥梁群桩桩端岩层破坏模式的特点将破坏面分为两个部分,结合极限分析法提出了下伏空洞桥梁群桩桩端岩层极限承载力计算方法,理论计算值与室内试验值吻合良好,验证了计算方法的合理性。同时分析了桩端岩层极限承载力随桩数增加的变化规律,可为岩溶区桥梁桩基工程建设提供参考。试验及理论计算结果表明:1)下伏空洞群桩桩端岩层发生整体冲切破坏时,破坏体整体可视为与单桩破坏体等效的大型墩基;(2)当桩间距较小时,群桩桩端岩层极限承载力随外围基桩外包络线长度增大而增加,当外包络线长度相同时,内部基桩布置方式对群桩桩端岩层极限承载力无影响;(3)群桩效应系数随桩间距的增大而增加,临界桩间距为5d~6dd为桩径)。

关键词: 桥梁群桩, 空洞地基, 极限承载力, 极限分析, 群桩效应系数

Abstract:

To explore the bearing mechanism and failure mode for rock layer of pile tip of bridge pile groups with underground karst cave, laboratory model tests of single pile and pile groups with different numbers of piles were carried out. The ultimate bearing capacity and failure modes for rock layer of pile tip of pile groups with different numbers of piles were captured. The failure surface was divided into two parts according to the characteristics of the failure mode for the rock layer with underground karst cave, and a calculation method for ultimate bearing capacity was developed by combining with limit analysis method. The theoretical calculation values match well with the experimental values, which verifies the rationality of the proposed method. Meanwhile, the relationship between the ultimate bearing capacity for the rock layer has been analyzed and it can provide reference for bridge pile foundation construction in karst area. The experimental and theoretical calculation results indicate that: (1) When the rock layer of pile tip of pile groups with underground karst cave is overall destroyed, the whole destroyed body can be regarded as a large pier foundation  similar to destroyed body of single pile. (2) When the pile spacing is smaller, the ultimate bearing capacity for the rock layer increases with the increase of the length of the outer envelope line of outer foundation pile. Furthermore, when the length of outer envelope lines are the same, the arrangement of internal foundation piles has no effect on the ultimate bearing capacity for the rock layer. (3) The coefficient of pile group effect increases with increasing the pile spacing, and the critical pile spacing is 5d−6d (d is the pile diameter).

Key words: bridge pile group, ground with underground karst cave, ultimate bearing capacity, limit analysis, pile group effect coefficient

中图分类号: TU473
[1] 李小刚, 武守信, 冯君, . 基于极限分析理论的悬索桥重力锚垂直齿坎抗滑力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2547-2558.
[2] 杨明云, 陈川, 赖莹, 陈云敏. 串联锚在黏土中的三向受荷承载力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 582-590.
[3] 娄旭龙, 张泽瑞, 孔德琼, 陈星潮, 朱斌, . 深海重型管道管土相互作用大变形极限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3234-3242.
[4] 石修松, 周高涨, 刘磊磊, . 基于非线性Hvorslev面的超固结土层隧道掌子面稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2595-2610.
[5] 戴北冰, 袁新, 周锡文, 刘锋涛, . 考虑间断速度场的光滑有限元极限分析上限法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2849-2858.
[6] 赵崇熙, 徐超, 王清明, 张胜, 李昊煜, . 土工合成材料加筋土桥台极限承载力的离心载荷试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1643-1650.
[7] 颜然, 孔纲强, 于江华, . 砂土地基中钻进比对螺旋桩安装性能和抗拔承载性能的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1778-1788.
[8] 熊根, 付栋康, 朱斌, 赖莹, . 软黏土中吸力锚承载特性离心试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1472-1480.
[9] 孙锐, 阳军生, 张庆贺, 杨峰, . 基于网格自适应加密策略的隧道稳定性三维极限分析下限有限元法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1256-1264.
[10] 周志雄, 周凤玺, 曹小林, 汪镇, . 复合地基极限承载力的变分极限平衡法分析——竖向增强[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3748-3754.
[11] 冯嵩, 郑颖人, 高红, . 岩土常规三轴Drucker-Prager准则[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 2919-2928.
[12] 朱克文, 俞剑, 黄茂松, . 饱和黏土中抗拔桩上限承载力分析及土塞效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1995-2004.
[13] 何杰, 郭端伟, 宋德新, 刘孟鑫, 张磊, 文奇峰, . 循环荷载下楔形劲芯水泥土复合桩工作特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1353-1362.
[14] 黄炜, 简文彬, 杨坚, 豆红强, 罗金妹, . 多支盘锚杆的原型试验与荷载传递特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 520-530.
[15] 王祖乐, 孔德琼, 杜越明, 朱斌, . 岩土工程连续极限分析方法拓展与验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3531-3540.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!