岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (12): 3405-3414.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1115

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

筏板基础下薄层土地基承载力研究

杨光华1, 2, 3,廖汉阳1   

  1. 1. 华南理工大学 土木与交通学院,广东 广州 510640;2. 广东省水利水电科学研究院,广东 广州 510610; 3. 广东省岩土工程技术研究中心,广东 广州 510610
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-27 接受日期:2023-10-10 出版日期:2023-12-20 发布日期:2023-12-21
  • 作者简介:杨光华,男,1962年生,博士,教授级高级工程师,博士生导师,主要从事本构理论、基础工程、软土工程及基坑工程等方面的研究、设计及咨询工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.52078143)。

Ground bearing capacity of thin layer soil under raft foundation

YANG Guang-hua1, 2, 3, LIAO Han-yang1   

  1. 1. Department of Civil Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510640, China; 2. Guangdong Research Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510610, China; 3. The Geotechnical Engineering Technology Center of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510610, China
  • Received:2023-07-27 Accepted:2023-10-10 Online:2023-12-20 Published:2023-12-21
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52078143).

摘要: 筏板基础下薄层土地基的承载力与均匀地基的承载力不同,不能简单地按通常的天然地基承载力方法来确定。通过现场压板载荷试验确定薄层土地基的强度指标和变形参数,把筏板基础分为若干网格。采用切线模量分层总和法计算各网格的地基刚度,把筏板基础看作为各网格支承下的弹性地基板,计算各网格共同作用下板底的压应力;将各网格的压应力与用薄层土地基强度参数计算的极限承载力比较,以判断地基强度承载力的安全性;再依据筏板的沉降变形,由薄层土地基的强度承载力和筏板基础变形控制确定这种含薄层土地基的允许承载力;通过与有限元方法进行比较,证明其是一种较合适的确定筏板基础下薄层土地基承载力的方法。

关键词: 筏板基础, 切线模量法, 地基承载力, 薄层土, 压板载荷试验

Abstract: The ground bearing capacity of thin layer soil under raft foundation is different from that of uniform ground, and cannot be simply determined by using the usual natural ground bearing capacity method. This article determines the strength index and deformation parameters of the thin layer soil ground through field plate loading tests, and divides the raft foundation into several grids to calculate the foundation stiffness of each grid employing the tangent modulus layerwise summation method. The raft foundation is considered as an elastic foundation plate supported by each grid, and the compressive stress at the bottom of the plate under the joint action of each grid is calculated. The compressive stress of each grid is compared with the ultimate ground bearing capacity predicted using thin layer soil ground strength parameters to judge the safety of the ground bearing capacity, and then according the settlement deformation of the raft, the allowable bearing capacity of this thin layer soil ground is determined by the strength bearing capacity of the thin layer soil ground and the deformation control of the raft foundation. Compared with the finite element method, it has been proven that this is a more suitable method for determining the ground bearing capacity of the thin layer soil under the raft foundation.

Key words: raft foundation, tangent modulus method, ground bearing capacity, thin layer soil, pressure plate load test

中图分类号: TU470
[1] 侯公羽, 张世欧, 崔迪, 陈宏波, 毕立原, 尚宇豪. 分布式光纤传感器在大体积混凝土筏板基础中的耦合性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1310-1322.
[2] 杨立. 平板载荷试验数值分析及承载力判定标准研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 723-730.
[3] 袁宇, 刘润, 付登锋, 孙国栋. 结构性海洋黏土损伤模型的二次开发及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(7): 1989-2002.
[4] 宋二祥, 陈星屹, 林世杰. 关于偏心荷载下地基承载力的验算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(7): 1925-1932.
[5] 沈扬, 冯照雁, 邓珏, 陈锴嘉, 许俊红, . 南海珊瑚砂地基承载力模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1281-1290.
[6] 宋二祥, 付浩, 李贤杰, . 饱和黏性土地基不排水条件下承载力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(11): 2919-2924.
[7] 周强, 黎康平, 段亚辉, 曹子君, 李典庆, . 基于广义可靠指标相对安全率的地基承载力 安全判据研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2052-2062.
[8] 王新志,王 星,刘海峰,孟庆山,朱长歧,. 珊瑚礁地基工程特性现场试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 2065-2070.
[9] 张玉成,杨光华,胡海英,刘翔宇,骆以道,姜 燕, . 载荷试验尺寸效应及地基承载力确定方法探讨[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 263-272.
[10] 杨光华,黄致兴,姜 燕,张玉成, . 地基承载力的双控确定方法[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 232-242.
[11] 闫澍旺,陈 静,孙立强,陈 浩,朱福明,. 深厚软土地基上充灌袋围埝下沉计算研究[J]. , 2016, 37(12): 3537-3544.
[12] 秦会来 ,周同和 ,郭院成 ,杜 超,. 土钉墙地基承载力问题探讨[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 393-397.
[13] 张 蕾. 原位载荷试验确定复合地基承载力方法研究[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 240-244.
[14] 曹宇春 ,刘富玲,. 基于综合变异系数的地基承载力可靠性分析[J]. , 2014, 35(7): 1950-1956.
[15] 杨 扬,卢坤林,朱大勇. 局部剪切破坏模式下的无重地基承载力[J]. , 2014, 35(1): 232-237.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!