岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (1): 245-256.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.0744

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

渤海海峡跨海通道工程区海域三维地应力测试

王锦山1,彭华2   

  1. 1. 河北科技师范学院 城市建设学院,河北 秦皇岛 066004;2. 中国地质科学院 地质力学研究所,北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2022-05-06 接受日期:2022-07-10 出版日期:2024-01-10 发布日期:2024-01-17
  • 作者简介:王锦山,男,1966年生,博士后,教授,研究生导师,主要从事岩土力学、岩土工程稳定性方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家海洋地质专项资助项目(No. GZH01-07-3-2)。

Measurement of 3D in-situ stress in the sea area of trans-Bohai strait passage engineering region

WANG Jin-shan1, PENG Hua2   

  1. 1.College of Urban Construction, Hebei Normal University of Science & Technology, Qinhuangdao, Hebei 066004, China; 2.Institute of Geomechanics, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2022-05-06 Accepted:2022-07-10 Online:2024-01-10 Published:2024-01-17
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Marine Geology Special Project of China(GZH01-07-3-2).

摘要: 跨渤海通道海域缺乏实测地应力基础数据,而海域钻探原位实测又承担着巨大风险与重重困难,为取得工程区现今地应力场特征第一手资料,利用以水压致裂地应力测量为主,以空心包体、非弹性应变恢复、差应变、声波各向异性法为辅的综合地应力测量技术,对研究区海域开展三维地应力测试与研究,建立了线性回归方程,得到了回归拟合曲线。结果表明,渤海海峡最大水平主应力σH、最小水平主应力σh 与垂直主应力σv 均随测试深度的增加呈线性增大规律;海峡南部地应力状态存在σHσhσv 的关系,处于逆冲应力状态,应力场方向为NE,最大水平主应力大于垂直主应力,区域内构造力处于主导地位;海峡北部应力状态为 σHσv >σh ,有利于走滑断层活动,应力场方向为NE,区域内构造力处于主导地位;整个工程区内地应力各分量值之间相差不大,远远小于区内断层活动应力值的下限,表明研究区目前处于稳定状态。研究结果符合一般地应力测量规律,测试流程符合地应力测试要求,测试数据可用于分析区域地应力状态。

关键词: 跨渤海海峡大通道, 工程区海域三维地应力, 综合测量技术

Abstract: Trans-Bohai passage sea area lacks basic data on measured in-situ stress. Conducting in-situ measurements in this area is challenging and carries significant risks. To obtain firsthand data on the current in-situ stress field characteristics, a comprehensive in-situ stress measurement technology is employed. This technology primarily relies on hydraulic fracturing in-situ stress measurement, supplemented by methods such as hollow inclusion, inelastic strain recovery, differential strain, and acoustic anisotropy. Three-dimensional in-situ stress measurement and research are conducted in the sea area of the study region. A linear regression equation is established, and a regression fitting curve is obtained. The results reveal certain patterns: as the test depth increases in the Bohai strait, the maximum horizontal principal stress σ, minimum horizontal principal stress σ, and vertical principal stress σ all increase linearly with the increase of test depth. In the southern part of the strait, the in-situ stress state follows the relationshipσHσhσv  , indicating a thrust stress state. The stress field direction is NE, with the maximum horizontal principal stress exceeding the vertical principal stress, suggesting dominance of tectonic forces in the region. In the northern part of the strait, the stress state is σHσv >σ, which is conducive to strike-slip fault activity. The stress field direction remains NE, and tectonic forces dominate in the region. Throughout the entire engineering region, there is minimal difference in each component value of the in-situ stress. These values are significantly lower than the lower limit of the active stress value of faults in the area, indicating that the study area is currently in a stable state. These findings align with the general principles of in-situ stress measurement. The testing process adheres to the requirements of in-situ stress testing, and the obtained data can be used to analyze the regional in-situ stress state.

Key words: trans-Bohai strait passage, 3D in-situ stress in the sea area of engineering region, comprehensive measurement technology

中图分类号: TU 452
[1] 马双星, 沈超敏, 刘斯宏, 王行, 李健, 张梦瑶. 堆石料级配相关力学规律预测方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3462-3472.
[2] KOCHARYAN Gevorg, OSTAPCHUK Alexey, SHATUNOV Ivan, 戚承志. 含黏土断层滑动行为稳定性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3513-3522.
[3] 谢立夫, 关振长, 黄明, 丘华生, 许超. 考虑主动铰接的盾构-地层相互作用模型及求解研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3574-3584.
[4] 张昕晔, 刘志伟, 翁效林, 李铉聪, 赵建崇, 刘小光. 上砂下黏复合地层隧道开挖面稳定性及破坏模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3637-3648.
[5] 王帅, 王豫徽, 王玲, 李佳祺, 赵梓皓, 庞凯旋, . 基于晶体模型的岩石孔隙结构与矿物组成对裂纹扩展影响机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3289-3301.
[6] 孙闯, 蒲云波, 敖云鹤, 陶琦, . 冻融饱水裂隙砂岩力学特性及细观破裂演化特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2339-2352.
[7] 沈扬, 沈嘉毅, 梁晖, 樊科伟. 基于3D打印技术的仿真钙质砂三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2353-2362.
[8] 王炳文, 刘臣毅, 康明超, 李乾龙, 杨雷, 周森林, 钱垒. 考虑应力的非闭合裂隙岩体损伤机制及裂纹扩展研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2409-2420.
[9] 刘雯, 范金洋, 刘文浩, 陈结, 刘伟, 吴斐, . 气压-应力耦合作用下盐岩应力松弛特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2434-2448.
[10] 吴兵, 盛建龙, 叶祖洋, 周新, . 单裂隙岩体非线性渗流-法向应力耦合模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2495-2504.
[11] 李满, 辛昊哲, 刘先珊, 张帆, 胡大伟, 杨福见, . 基于修正相场模型的岩体混合模式破裂数值研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2600-2612.
[12] 肖智勇, 王刚, 刘杰, 邓华锋, 郑程程, 姜枫, . 基于等效裂隙的表观渗透率模型改进及变滑脱效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1466-1479.
[13] 李邵军, 张世殊, 李永红, 柳秀洋, 李治国, 徐鼎平, 程丽娟, 江权, 汤大明, 陈刚, . 双江口水电站极高应力大型地下厂房硬岩破坏机制与稳定性控制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1581-1594.
[14] 张艳博, 周浩, 梁鹏, 姚旭龙, 陶志刚, 来有邦, . 基于到时精确拾取与智能优化算法结合的岩石声发射定位方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1643-1656.
[15] 汪昕, 幸安康, 曾子强, 姜祎, 徐建宇, 王晓南, 刘造保, . 层理铁矿石剪切力学性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1039-1048.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!