岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2): 325-339.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0204

• 基础理论与实验研究 •    下一篇

应力-渗流耦合作用下不同卸荷路径对砂岩损伤特性及能量演化规律的影响研究

张培森1, 2,许大强1, 2,颜伟1, 2,张晓乐1, 2,董宇航1, 2,赵铭1, 2   

  1. 1. 山东科技大学 矿山灾害预防控制国家重点实验室培育基地,山东 青岛 266590; 2. 山东科技大学 矿业工程国家级实验教学示范中心,山东 青岛 266590
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-20 接受日期:2023-05-05 出版日期:2024-02-11 发布日期:2024-02-06
  • 通讯作者: 许大强,男,1997年生,硕士研究生,主要从事岩石力学与煤矿防治水等方面的研究。E-mail:840684859@qq.com
  • 作者简介:张培森,男,1977年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩石力学与采矿工程等方面的研究。peisen_sky@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(No. 2018YFC0604702);国家自然科学基金(No. 51379119);山东省自然科学基金(No. ZR2021ME086)。

Influence of unloading paths on sandstone damage characteristics and energy evolution law under stress-seepage coupling

ZHANG Pei-sen1, 2, XU Da-qiang1, 2, YAN Wei1, 2, ZHANG Xiao-le1, 2, DONG Yu-hang1, 2, ZHAO Ming1, 2   

  1. 1. National Key Laboratory for Mine Disaster Prevention and Control, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, Shandong 266590, China; 2. National Demonstration Center for Experimental Mining Engineering Education, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, Shandong 266590, China
  • Received:2023-02-20 Accepted:2023-05-05 Online:2024-02-11 Published:2024-02-06
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFC0604702), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51379119) and the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2021ME086).

摘要:

岩体灾害发生的本质是能量驱动下的一种失稳现象,受开挖卸荷扰动影响导致的岩体结构破裂失稳是诱发采场突水等动力灾害的主要原因之一。为探究开挖卸荷过程对岩体结构破裂的影响,明晰围岩劣化损伤规律及突水等动力灾害孕育机制,针对应力-渗流耦合因素影响下岩石损伤特性及能量演化规律研究较少的特点,采用Rock Top多场耦合试验仪,在应力-渗流耦合作用下对砂岩开展了常规三轴(C组)、不同初始损伤程度常规卸围压(W组)及循环加卸围压(X组)3种应力路径下的岩石损伤特性及能量演化规律试验研究。试验结果表明:岩石能量演化规律与应力-应变曲线具有明显相关性,基于岩石弹性应变能演化特征,将常规三轴压缩(C组)下岩石应力-应变曲线分为5个阶段,并对每个阶段U1U3UeUd及渗透率变化特点进行了详细阐释(Ue为弹性应变能,Ud为耗散能,U1为轴向应力对岩石做正功转化的岩石应变能,U3为做负功所释放的应变能);常规卸围压过程中,U1U3演化规律与C组岩石基本一致,但U3负增长更为显著,岩石输入能逐渐从以Ue为主导转变为以Ud为主导,初始损伤程度对该规律无明显影响,卸围压过程中渗透率呈波动上升趋势,围压与渗透率呈负相关;循环加卸围压过程中,各能量演化规律与W组岩石基本一致,仅因时间效应而导致能量积累量存有差异。整体来看,无论何种应力路径,峰前阶段岩石均以Ue为主导,以能量存储为主,峰后阶段则以能量释放及耗散为主,轴向应力加载是Ue得以快速积累的主要影响因素,围压改变不足以引起Ue发生较大变化,轴向载荷作用为工程致灾的主要影响因素。此外,岩石损伤变量与围压存在明显负相关,围压越大,岩石Ue释放比例越小,岩石损伤越小,围压束缚作用可有效提高岩石储能能力并抑制岩石能量的耗散与释放。

关键词: 岩石力学, 应力-渗流耦合, 卸荷路径, 损伤特性, 能量演化

Abstract:

Rock mass disasters are caused by instability driven by energy within the rock mass. The excavation and unloading disturbance can lead to fractures and instability in the rock mass structure, which is a major cause of dynamic disasters such as water inrush in stopes. To understand the influence of excavation unloading on rock mass structure fractures and to clarify the degradation law of surrounding rock and the mechanism of dynamic disasters like water inrush, this study focuses on the characteristics of rock damage and the evolution of energy under stress-seepage coupling factors. Using the Rock Top multi-field coupling tester, the study investigates the rock damage characteristics and energy evolution under three stress paths: conventional triaxial compression (group C), conventional unloading confining pressure with different initial damage degrees (group W), and cyclic loading and unloading confining pressure (group X) under the influence of stress-seepage coupling. Based on the evolution characteristics of rock elastic strain energy, the stress-strain curve of rock under conventional triaxial compression (group C) is divided into five stages, and the characteristics of U1, U3, Ue, Ud and permeability change in each stage are explained in detail (Ue is the elastic strain energy, Ud is the dissipated energy, U1 is the strain energy of the rock transformed by the positive work done by the axial stress on the rock, and U3 is the strain energy released by the negative work). During the conventional confining pressure unloading process, the evolution law of U1 and U3 is similar to that of group C rock, but the negative growth of U3 is more significant. The rock input energy gradually shifts from Ue to Ud, and the initial damage degree has no significant influence on the law. During the confining pressure unloading process, the permeability shows a fluctuating upward trend, and the confining pressure is negatively correlated with the permeability. In the process of cyclic loading and unloading confining pressure, the energy evolution law is similar to that of group W rock, with energy accumulation differing only due to time effects. On the whole, regardless of the stress path, the pre-peak rock is dominated by Ue, representing energy storage, while post-peak rock is dominated by energy release and dissipation. Axial stress loading is the main influencing factor for rapid accumulation of Ue, while the change in confining pressure is not enough to cause a large change in Ue. Axial load is the primary factor influencing engineering disasters. Furthermore, there is a significant negative correlation between rock damage variable and confining pressure. The larger the confining pressure is, the smaller the Ue release ratio of rock is, and the smaller the rock damage is. Confining pressure restraint effectively enhances the energy storage capacity of rock and inhibits the dissipation and release of rock energy.

Key words: rock mechanics, stress-seepage coupling, unloading path, damage characteristics, energy evolution

中图分类号: TU 447
[1] 刘一鸣, 李振, 冯国瑞, 杨鹏, 白锦文, 黄炳雄, 李东, . 循环加卸载下裂隙砂岩声−热响应特征及前兆规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2773-2791.
[2] 李晓锋, 李海波, 刘黎旺, 傅帅旸, . 冲击荷载作用下岩石动态拉伸破坏特征及细观机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2387-2398.
[3] 张培森, 王洪伟, 洪荒, 许大强, 陈增宝, 邓云驰, 梁展, 李金坤, 陈文豪, 崔乾, . 渗流-采动应力耦合作用下深部砂岩力学及能量演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1997-2010.
[4] 吕萌, 王亮清, 谢妮, 朱林锋, 安彩龙, 柯睿, 王旭晨, . 加锚异性结构面剪切特性及声发射响应特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2106-2120.
[5] 倪祖甲, 乔江美, 张俊楷, 唐旭海, . 基于微观岩石力学试验及精确矿物晶体建模的砂岩力学性质及波速分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1865-1880.
[6] 张艳博, 周浩, 梁鹏, 姚旭龙, 陶志刚, 来有邦, . 基于到时精确拾取与智能优化算法结合的岩石声发射定位方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1643-1656.
[7] 马语航, 何明明, 李宁, . XCY-2旋切触探系统研发及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 1025-1038.
[8] 李利萍, 余泓浩, 李秋雨, 潘一山, . 含水煤块超低摩擦效应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3093-3103.
[9] 杨科, 于祥, 何祥, 侯永强, 张连富, . 不同含水状态矸石胶结充填体能量演化与损伤特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 26-42.
[10] 郑可跃, 施成华, 娄义黎, 贾朝军, 雷明锋, 杨益, . 深部高地应力隧道开挖卸荷围岩能量计算方法及演化机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 165-177.
[11] 范浩, 王磊, 罗勇, 朱传奇, . 卸荷损伤砂岩的分级加载三轴蠕变力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 277-288.
[12] 孙杰豪, 郭保华, 田世轩, 程坦, . 基于声发射特征参数的砂岩节理直剪破坏特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 167-177.
[13] 苗柯韩, 黄勇, 马晓凡, 王超琦. 基于分形理论的岩体粗糙裂隙中溶质运移预测模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2527-2538.
[14] 韩勇, 李树忱, 袁超, 冯现大, 王修伟, . 单轴压缩下薄喷裂隙红砂岩力学性质与裂纹扩展特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2583-2594.
[15] 刘晓裴, 江权, 李邵军, 辛杰, 陈朋飞, . 循环加卸载下大理岩渐进损伤的能量特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2373-2386.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!