岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2): 552-562.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0312

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于极限平衡法的危岩倾覆稳定性三维计算方法

彭海游1, 2, 3,谢强1,陈柏林1, 2, 3,檀康2, 3,王琦2, 3,杨文君2   

  1. 1. 重庆大学 土木工程学院,重庆 400045;2. 重庆地质矿产研究院 自然资源部地质灾害自动化监测技术创新中心,重庆 401120; 3. 重庆地质矿产研究院 重庆市地质灾害自动化监测工程技术研究中心,重庆 401120
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-13 接受日期:2023-06-07 出版日期:2024-02-11 发布日期:2024-02-07
  • 通讯作者: 谢强,男,1975年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩石损伤机制及地质灾害防治方面的研究。E-mail:xieqiang2000@163.com
  • 作者简介:彭海游,男,1986年生,博士,高级工程师,主要从事地质灾害防治方面的研究。penghaiyou@yeah.net
  • 基金资助:
    重庆市自然科学基金(No. CSTB2022NSCQ-MSX1466);重庆市地质灾害防治中心科技项目(No. KJ2021050)

Three-dimensional calculation method for stability against overturning of overhanging rock based on limit equilibrium method

PENG Hai-you1, 2, 3, XIE Qiang1, CHEN Bo-lin1, 2, 3, TAN Kang2, 3, WANG Qi2, 3, YANG Wen-jun2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China; 2. Technology Innovation Center of Geohazards Automatic Monitoring, Ministry of Natural Resources, Chongqing Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources, Chongqing 401120, China; 3. Chongqing Engineering Research Center of Automatic Monitoring for Geological Hazards, Chongqing Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources, Chongqing 401120, China
  • Received:2023-03-13 Accepted:2023-06-07 Online:2024-02-11 Published:2024-02-07
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Chongqing Natural Science Foundation (CSTB2022NSCQ-MSX1466) and the Science and Technology Project of Chongqing Geological Disaster Prevention Center (KJ2021050).

摘要: 目前危岩防治工作中,危岩稳定性评价主要以简化后的二维剖面作为计算模型。由于自然界中的危岩形态极不规则,采用二维剖面计算模型并不能真实反映危岩受力情况。为了研究危岩稳定性三维计算方法,在前人研究基础上,基于极限平衡理论,提出了由后缘裂缝抗拉强度控制的危岩倾覆稳定性三维计算公式,采用数值积分和空间几何方法给出了在危岩单体三维模型基础上求解危岩后缘岩体抗拉力、水压力及其力矩计算公式和实现流程。以三峡库区瞿塘峡吊嘴危岩为实例开展了应用,并通过数值分析进行了验证。通过不同形态危岩的三维稳定性分析,讨论了三维与二维稳定性计算结果的关系,对比发现危岩形态对稳定性计算结果有明显影响,三维计算较二维计算更准确和实用。

关键词: 危岩, 倾覆稳定性, 三维, 极限平衡法

Abstract: In the field of overhanging rock prevention and control, the stability calculations have traditionally used simplified two-dimensional profiles as the calculation model. However, the irregular shape of overhanging rocks in nature cannot be accurately represented by this simplified model, leading to limitations in stress analysis. To address this, a three-dimensional calculation method for overhanging rock stability was developed based on limit equilibrium theory and previous research. The proposed method focuses on the stability against overturning of overhanging rocks controlled by the tensile strength of the trailing edge crack. A three-dimensional calculation formula was derived, taking into account the tension resistance, water pressure, and moment of the trailing edge rock. The formula was implemented using numerical integration and spatial geometry methods, providing a comprehensive approach to analyzing the stability of overhanging rock. To validate the proposed method, an application was conducted using the Diaozui overhanging rock in the Qutangxia area of the Three Gorges Reservoir. Numerical analysis was performed to verify the results. By analyzing the stability of different forms of overhanging rock in three dimensions, the relationship between the three-dimensional stability calculation results and the traditional two-dimensional stability analysis was explored. The findings revealed that the shape of overhanging rock significantly impacts the stability calculation results. It was concluded that three-dimensional calculations provide more accurate and practical results compared to the traditional two-dimensional approach.

Key words: overhanging rock, stability against overturning, three-dimensional, limit equilibrium method

中图分类号: TU 443
[1] 金解放, 熊慧颖, 肖莜丰, 彭孝旺. 岩石超声波对三维地应力的敏感性及传播衰减特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 183-194.
[2] 邓其宁, 崔玉龙, 王炯超, 郑俊, 许冲, . 三维边坡稳定性计算的ChatGPT辅助编程方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 322-334.
[3] 李顺群, 张春伟, 周燕, 张凯, 李有兵, 井乐炜, 王英红, . 部分测试数据缺失时特殊条件下的三维应力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1419-1428.
[4] 邓志平, 钟敏, 蒋水华, 潘敏, 黄劲松, . 土体参数非平稳随机场模拟及三维边坡高效可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3243-3252.
[5] 张红日, 杨济铭, 徐永福, 肖杰, 韩仲, 汪磊, 林宇亮, . 基于数字图像相关技术的膨胀土三维裂隙扩展特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 309-323.
[6] 李顺群, 蔡田明, 张勋程, 张丙坤, 杨长松, 周光毅, 周燕, . 冲击荷载作用下非饱和场地的三维应力响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 477-484.
[7] 周建, 尚肖楠, 刘福深, 沈君逸, 廖星川, . 倾斜临空面下隧道掘进机滚刀贯入破岩研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 705-714.
[8] 高盟, 张硕, 孔祥龙, . 三维周期结构波阻板的带隙特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1651-1660.
[9] 孙锐, 阳军生, 张庆贺, 杨峰, . 基于网格自适应加密策略的隧道稳定性三维极限分析下限有限元法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1256-1264.
[10] 李林, 孙砖芹. 考虑基质吸力影响的非饱和路堤三维稳定性上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1014-1025.
[11] 刘新荣, 王浩, 郭雪岩, 罗新飏, 周小涵, 许彬, . 考虑消落带岩体劣化影响的典型危岩岸坡稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 563-576.
[12] 易琪, 孙冠华, 姚院峰, 桂本, 商浩亮, 纪文栋, . 压缩空气储能地下内衬硐库上覆岩体稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3523-3532.
[13] 周志雄, 周凤玺, 曹小林, 汪镇, . 复合地基极限承载力的变分极限平衡法分析——竖向增强[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3748-3754.
[14] 贺铮, 谢谟文, 吴志祥, 赵晨, 孙广存, 徐乐, . 应用微芯桩传感器的拉裂型边坡危岩体临崩倾斜变形特征现场实测研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(11): 3399-3415.
[15] 王锦山, 彭华, . 渤海海峡跨海通道工程区海域三维地应力测试[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 245-256.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!