岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3): 867-877.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0403

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

微型钢管桩内接于灌注桩围护结构计算方法探讨

张军舰1, 2,张勇2, 3,隋倩倩2, 3   

  1. 1. 岩土科技股份有限公司,浙江 杭州 311400;2. 青岛市勘察测绘研究院,山东 青岛 266032; 3. 青岛岩土基础工程公司,山东 青岛 266032
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-31 接受日期:2023-07-03 出版日期:2024-03-11 发布日期:2024-03-20
  • 作者简介:张军舰,男,1979年生,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事岩土工程设计与研究工作。E-mail: zhangjunjianhz@163.com

Discussion of the calculation method of enclosure structure of “micro-steel pipe pile internally connected into concrete pile”

ZHANG Jun-jian1, ZHANG Yong2, 3, SUI Qian-qian2, 3   

  1. 1. Geotechnical Technology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, Zhejiang 311401, China; 2. Geotechnical Investigation and Surveying Research Institute, Qingdao, Shandong 266032, China; 3. Qingdao Geotechnical Foundation Engineering Company, Qingdao, Shandong 266032, China
  • Received:2023-03-31 Accepted:2023-07-03 Online:2024-03-11 Published:2024-03-20

摘要: 针对土岩结合二元地层深基坑工程中“吊脚桩”围护结构存在的问题,提出了灌注桩内接微型钢管桩围护结构。考虑微型钢管桩与桩间岩土的“纽结效应”和开挖后桩间岩石与带裂缝混凝土相似性,将该结构等效为上部灌注桩+下部带裂缝的钢筋混凝土无腹筋等效梁阶梯变截面桩(梁)模型,下部等效梁中微型钢管为纵向钢筋,桩间岩石为带裂缝混凝土。用侧向刚度折减来定量表征围护结构截面减少和岩体裂缝对围护结构刚度影响,提出基于侧向刚度折减的弹性支点法来计算围护结构内力,并考虑纵筋销栓作用计算等效梁抗剪承载力。工程实例计算表明,侧向刚度折减系数β 由0.85减至0.12,上部灌注桩弯矩增大55.8%,下部等效梁弯矩减少48.7%,上部灌注桩剪力减少13.6%,下部等效梁剪力减少22.0%,桩顶水平位移增加39.5%。开挖至土岩结合面处该结构相对于“吊脚桩”围护结构,桩顶水平位移、竖向沉降没有明显突增,桩顶最终水平位移、竖向沉降仅为“吊脚桩”围护结构的43%、69%。桩顶水平位移监测值为5.5 mm,仅为计算包络值的35%,说明刚度折减系数可适当提高。本研究可为土岩结合二元地层深基坑支护提供参考。

关键词: 土岩组合二元地层, 灌注桩内接钢管桩, 纽结效应, 纵筋销栓作用, 带裂缝混凝土, 侧向刚度折减

Abstract: This study focuses on addressing the issues associated with the “end-suspended pile” structure in deep foundation pits within soil-rock composite strata by implementing an enclosure structure called “micro-steel tube pile internally connected into concrete pile”. The structure is analyzed considering the “knot effect” between the micro steel pipe pile and the rock, as well as the similar mechanical characteristics between excavated rocks and cracked concrete. The structure is modeled as a stepped variable section pile (beam), consisting of an upper concrete pile and a lower equivalent cracked beam without stirrups. The micro steel pipes serve as axial reinforcements for the equivalent beam, while the rocks represent the cracked concrete of the equivalent beam. The reduction in lateral stiffness is used to quantitatively assess the impact of section reduction and rock mass fractures. An elastic subgrade method based on lateral stiffness reduction is employed, taking into account the dowel action of axial reinforcement to calculate the shear bearing capacity of the equivalent beam. The analysis of a case study demonstrates that the lateral stiffness reduction coefficient β  ranges from 0.85 to 0.12, the bending moment of the upper concrete pile increases by 55.8%, the bending moment of the lower equivalent beam decreases by 48.7%, the shear force of the upper concrete pile decreases by 13.6%, the shear force of the lower equivalent beam decreases by 22.0%, and the horizontal displacement of the concrete pile top increases by 39.5%. Comparing this structure with the “end-suspended pile” structure, it is observed that the horizontal displacement and vertical settlement of the concrete pile top do not significantly increase. The final horizontal displacement and vertical settlement of the concrete pile top are only 43% and 69%, respectively, compared to the “end-suspended pile” structure. The measured horizontal displacement at the concrete pile top is 5.5 mm, which is only 35% of the calculated results, suggesting that the lateral stiffness reduction coefficient can be appropriately adjusted. This study provides valuable insights for the design and protection of deep foundation pits in soil-rock composite strata.

Key words: soil-rock composite stratum, micro-steel pipe pile internally connected into concrete pile, knot effect, dowel action, cracked concrete, bending stiffness reduction

中图分类号: TU472
[1] 童佳荣, 张曙, 李荣, 夏彬桐, 王宁伟, . 电动化学加固技术对珠海软土改性的机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 262-270.
[2] 刘欣, 沈宇鹏, 刘志坚, 王炳禄, 刘越, 韩昀希. 地下水流速对地铁联络通道冻结壁形成过程影响的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2667-2678.
[3] 马书文, 卢谅, 王宗建, 王经天, 李蓝星, . 落石冲击下预应力加筋土路堤变形及荷载传递机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 799-809.
[4] 王裘申, 徐超, 张振, 沈盼盼, 吴伟成, 张逍, . 交通荷载下加筋土桥台工作性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(12): 3416-3425.
[5] 刘斯宏, 李博文, 鲁洋, 沈超敏, 方斌昕, 杭丹, . 土工袋垫层抗液化性能振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 183-192.
[6] 肖涵, 董超强, 章荣军, 陆展, 郑俊杰. 生石灰对理化复合法处理淤泥浆效率的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 214-222.
[7] 冯衡, 高斐略, 刘观仕, 高彬, 肖飞, 曾二贤, . 风积沙地基金属装配式基础的真型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(12): 3328-3334.
[8] 韩建文, 刘宝, 王飞, 杨明雨, 陶明安. 高速铁路硅藻土路基工程现场综合试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(12): 4063-4072.
[9] 刘杨, 刘维, 史培新, 赵宇, 王秒, . 超深地连墙成槽富水软弱层局部失稳理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 9-18.
[10] 李 鹏,苏生瑞,王闫超,王 琦. 含软弱层岩质边坡的动力响应研究[J]. , 2013, 34(S1): 365-370.
[11] 卢坤林,朱大勇,杨 扬. LU Kun-lin,  ZHU Da-yong,  YANG Yang 均质边坡准三维安全系数实用计算曲线[J]. , 2012, 33(S2): 111-117.
[12] 戈海玉,涂劲松. 边坡位移预测的非线性组合模型及应用[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1808-1812.
[13] 刘华丽 ,朱大勇 ,钱七虎 ,李宏伟. 边坡三维端部效应分析[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1905-1909.
[14] 钱纪芸,张 嘎,张建民. 降雨条件下土坡变形机制的离心模型试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(2): 398-402.
[15] 黄红元,荣 耀. 饱和砂层驱水渗透注浆分析[J]. , 2009, 30(7): 2016-2020.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!