岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5): 1446-1456.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0852

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

竖井地基大应变非线性固结解析解

王亦炀,李传勋,李阔,陆向综   

  1. 江苏大学 土木工程与力学学院,江苏 镇江 212013
  • 收稿日期:2023-06-17 接受日期:2023-08-22 出版日期:2024-05-11 发布日期:2024-05-07
  • 通讯作者: 李传勋,男,1978年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土工程方面的教学和科研工作。E-mail:lichuanxun@yeah.net
  • 作者简介:王亦炀,男,1999年生,硕士研究生,主要从事竖井排水固结方面的研究工作。E-mail:2222223023@stmail.ujs.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 42377183)。

Analytical solutions for large-strain nonlinear consolidation of soils with vertical drain

WANG Yi-yang, LI Chuan-xun, LI Kuo, LU Xiang-zong   

  1. Faculty of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212013, Chin
  • Received:2023-06-17 Accepted:2023-08-22 Online:2024-05-11 Published:2024-05-07
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42377183).

摘要: 已有的研究表明,高压缩性软土的大应变及非线性固结特性对其固结具有显著影响。但目前能同时考虑两者影响的竖井地基大应变非线性固结解析解还鲜见报道。考虑高压缩性软土在固结中的大变形特性,应用双对数压缩渗透非线性模型描述软土在固结中的压缩渗透特性变化,基于Gibson大应变固结理论,建立竖井地基大应变非线性固结模型并获得模型的解析解。将所获得的解析解与竖井地基大应变非线性固结数值解及特定工况下小应变线性固结解析解进行对比,以验证所获解析解的可靠性。在此基础上,通过大量计算对不同工况下竖井地基非线性固结性状开展分析。结果表明:压缩指数Ic为定值时竖井地基固结速率随参数α 减小而增大。α 保持不变时竖井地基固结速率随Ic减小而增大。压缩渗透参数保持不变时,竖井地基固结速率随着外荷载的增大而加快,随着井径比增大而减慢。将所获解析解应用于深港西部通道口岸区填海地基处理的工程计算,表明理论计算的沉降曲线与实测曲线较为吻合,说明了所获解析解的工程可应用性。

关键词: 竖井地基, 非线性, 大应变, 变荷载, 解析解

Abstract: The large strain and nonlinear consolidation characteristics of soft soils with high compressibility have obvious effects on their consolidation, but few analytical solutions for large-strain nonlinear consolidation of soils with vertical drains have been reported in the literature. By considering the large deformation characteristics of soft soils with high compressibility during consolidation, a large-strain nonlinear consolidation model of soils with vertical drains is developed and an analytical solution for this consolidation model is obtained based on Gibson’s large deformation consolidation theory, in which a double logarithmic nonlinear compressibility and permeability model is adopted to describe the variation of the compressibility and permeability of soft soils. The proposed analytical solutions are compared with the numerical solutions of large-strain nonlinear consolidation of soils with vertical drains and the analytical solutions of small-strain linear consolidation under specific conditions to verify its reliability. On this basis, the nonlinear consolidation properties of soils with vertical drains under different conditions are analyzed by extensive calculations. The results show that the consolidation rate increases with decreasing the permeability parameter α , when the compression index Ic, keeps constant. The consolidation rate increases with decreasing the compression index Ic, when the permeability parameter α  remains constant. The consolidation rate of soils with vertical drains increases with an increase in external load, and decrease with an increase in the ratio of influential zone radius to vertical drain radius when the compressibility and permeability parameters remain constant. Finally, the proposed analytical solution is applied to the reclaimed foundation treatment project of Shenzhen Western Corridor boundary control point(BCP). The settlement curve calculated by proposed solutions is in good agreement with the measured curve, which further illustrates the engineering applicability of the proposed analytical solution.

Key words: soils with vertical drains, nonlinearity, large strain, time-dependent loading, analytical solution

中图分类号: TU 470
[1] 付强, 杨科, 刘钦节, 宋涛涛, 吴犇牛, 于鹏, . 交变荷载下围岩−衬砌组合结构界面强度特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 40-52.
[2] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[3] 刘雯, 范金洋, 刘文浩, 陈结, 刘伟, 吴斐, . 气压-应力耦合作用下盐岩应力松弛特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2434-2448.
[4] 吴兵, 盛建龙, 叶祖洋, 周新, . 单裂隙岩体非线性渗流-法向应力耦合模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2495-2504.
[5] 陈灯红, 张心瀚, 刘云辉, 胡昊文, 刘云龙, 梁羽翔, . 基于八叉树比例边界有限元法的高拱坝-不规则地基-库水系统非线性地震响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2586-2599.
[6] 张春顺, 林正鸿, 杨典森, 陈嘉瑞, . 考虑初始级配影响的粗粒土非线性弹性模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 750-760.
[7] 周航, 汪义圣, 亓戈平, . 黏弹性土中异形桩横向动力响应半解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 761-774.
[8] 王浩, 侯泓冰, 江文豪, . 考虑根系对水文特性影响下非饱和植被土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3329-3345.
[9] 张智卿, 刘鑫, 刘开富, 吴君涛, 吴文兵, . 横观各向同性土体中端承桩水平振动特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3371-3382.
[10] 孙宏磊, 徐振恺, 刘斯杰, 蔡袁强, . 考虑土柱发展过程的淤泥真空预压大应变固结计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 133-146.
[11] 田抒平, 王振钰, 张陈蓉, . 大直径单桩基础海上风机非线性共振特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 156-164.
[12] 雷国平, 吴泽雄, 苏栋, 莫烨强, 程马遥, . 考虑桩身材料非线性的微型抗滑桩计算p-y[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 337-348.
[13] 石修松, 周高涨, 刘磊磊, . 基于非线性Hvorslev面的超固结土层隧道掌子面稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2595-2610.
[14] 孙锦鑫, 卢萌盟, 刘干斌, . 高置换率散体材料桩-不透水桩组合型复合地基非线性固结解析研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2421-2436.
[15] 江学辉, 颜建伟, 罗文俊, 李佳宝, 徐长节. 纵向压力和加固钢板对隧道力学性能影响的解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1623-1632.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!