岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6): 1623-1632.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1224

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

纵向压力和加固钢板对隧道力学性能影响的解析解

江学辉,颜建伟,罗文俊,李佳宝,徐长节   

  1. 华东交通大学 轨道交通基础设施性能监测与保障国家重点实验室,江西 南昌 330013
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-15 接受日期:2023-10-10 出版日期:2024-06-19 发布日期:2024-06-19
  • 通讯作者: 罗文俊,女,1979年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事轨道交通专业的教学与科研工作。E-mail: lwj06051979@163.com
  • 作者简介:江学辉,男,1987年生,博士研究生,主要从事隧道理论及加固研究。E-mail: jiangxh2020@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.52225210,No.51978265);江西省防灾减灾及应急管理重点实验室项目(No.20212BCD42011)。

Analytical solution for mechanical properties of tunnel influenced by longitudinal pressure and reinforced steel plate

JIANG Xue-hui, YAN Jian-wei, LUO Wen-jun, LI Jia-bao, XU Chang-jie   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Performance Monitoring and Protecting of Rail Transit Infrastructure, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330013, China
  • Received:2023-08-15 Accepted:2023-10-10 Online:2024-06-19 Published:2024-06-19
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52225210, 51978265) and the Prevention and Control Disaster and Emergency Management of Jiangxi Key Laboratory Project (20212BCD42011).

摘要: 为快速准确地评估纵向压力和加固钢板对盾构隧道力学性能的影响,基于隧道衬砌接缝面建立考虑纵向压力、弯矩和加固钢板耦合作用下的应力平衡方程,推导出了隧道力学性能的解析解。通过与经典抗弯刚度理论和数值模拟的计算结果对比,验证了该方法的可靠性。研究表明:隧道中性轴随纵向压力、加固钢板厚度和弹性模量增加而减小;隧道抗弯刚度随弯矩增大而减小(最大和最小隧道抗弯刚度与弯矩大小无关),与纵向压力呈S曲线正相关,与加固钢板厚度和弹性模量呈非线性正相关。有加固钢板的隧道抗弯刚度是无加固钢板的6.58倍;弯矩承载力与纵向压力、加固钢板厚度和弹性模量呈非线性正相关;衬砌接缝张开量与纵向压力、加固钢板厚度和弹性模量呈非线性反相关,与弯矩呈非线性正相关。该计算方法解析地诠释了纵向压力与加固钢板对盾构隧道力学性能的影响机制。

关键词: 隧道工程, 解析解, 纵向压力, 加固钢板, 抗弯刚度

Abstract: In order to quickly and accurately evaluate the effect of longitudinal compressive pressure and reinforced steel plate on the mechanical properties of shield tunnel, we established stress equilibrium equations that consider the coupling effect of longitudinal pressure, bending moment and reinforced steel plate based on the joints of shield tunnel lining, and finally derived the analytical solution. The feasibility of the method was confirmed by comparing with the results of classical equivalent bending stiffness and numerical simulations. The results indicate that the neutral axial decreases with the increasing longitudinal pressure, thickness and elastic modulus of the reinforced steel plate. The equivalent bending stiffness of the shield tunnel decreases with the increasing bending moment (maximum and minimum equivalent bending stiffness are independent of the bending moment). It follows an S-curve pattern correlation with the longitudinal pressure, and shows a nonlinear correlation with the thickness and elastic modulus of the reinforced steel plate. The equivalent bending stiffness of the tunnel with reinforced steel plate is 6.58 times that of the tunnel without steel plate. The bending bearing capacity is nonlinear with respect to the longitudinal pressure, the thickness and elastic modulus of reinforced steel plate. The opening of tunnel lining joints is nonlinear with respect to the bending moment, but inversely nonlinear to the longitudinal pressure, the thickness and elastic modulus of the reinforced steel plate. This analytical solution reveals the evolution of the mechanical properties of shield tunnels under the influence of longitudinal pressure and reinforced steel plate.

Key words: tunnel engineering, analytical solution, longitudinal pressure, reinforced steel plate, bending stiffness

中图分类号: U25
[1] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[2] 周航, 汪义圣, 亓戈平, . 黏弹性土中异形桩横向动力响应半解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 761-774.
[3] 王浩, 侯泓冰, 江文豪, . 考虑根系对水文特性影响下非饱和植被土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3329-3345.
[4] 张智卿, 刘鑫, 刘开富, 吴君涛, 吴文兵, . 横观各向同性土体中端承桩水平振动特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3371-3382.
[5] 王亦炀, 李传勋, 李阔, 陆向综. 竖井地基大应变非线性固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1446-1456.
[6] 刘景锦, 罗学思, 雷华阳, 郑刚, 罗昊鹏, . 等应变条件下增压式真空预压固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 809-821.
[7] 张佳威, 崔臻, 张翔宇, 曹俊, . 高地应力环境下跨活断层隧道抗错断铰接设计试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(11): 3333-3344.
[8] 高柳, 吕述晖, 王奎华, . 缺陷桩-梁系统的动力特性应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 3095-3104.
[9] 张玉国, 杨文兵, 赵雅纯, 王闯, 赵亚敏. 双向渗流下考虑应力时空效应的组合桩复合地基固结理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 184-196.
[10] 周晓敏, 马文著, 张松, 宋宜祥, 刘勇, 和晓楠, . 渗流条件下隧道锚注复合围岩体的解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 206-220.
[11] 孙闯, 兰思琦, 陶琦, 关喜彬, 韩希平, . 深埋隧道软弱围岩拱顶三维渐进性塌落机制上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2471-2484.
[12] 余俊, 李东凯, 和振, 张志中. 带有两端防渗墙坝基的各向异性渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2381-2388.
[13] 张硕成, 陈文化. 考虑不均匀冻胀土体-衬砌隧道在寒区的振动响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1467-1476.
[14] 王祖贤, 施成华, 龚琛杰, 曹成勇, 彭铸, 孙影杰, . 考虑横向性能的盾构隧道纵向非线性等效抗弯刚度计算模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1295-1308.
[15] 黄娟, 和振, 余俊, 杨鑫歆. 渗透各向异性圆形围堰稳态渗流场解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1035-1043.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!