岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6): 1835-1849.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1001

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于粗颗粒嵌锁点高铁级配碎石振动压实质量控制新方法

邓志兴1,谢康1,李泰灃2,王武斌3,郝哲睿1,李佳珅1   

  1. 1. 中南大学 土木工程学院,湖南 长沙 410083;2. 中国铁道科学研究院集团有限公司 铁道建筑研究所,北京 100081; 3. 西南交通大学 陆地交通地质灾害防治技术国家工程研究中心,四川 成都 611731
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-10 接受日期:2023-10-07 出版日期:2024-06-19 发布日期:2024-06-20
  • 通讯作者: 谢康,男,1995年生,博士研究生,主要从事智能压实控制方面的研究。E-mail: xiekang1995@csu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:邓志兴,男,1998年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土工程变形问题智能预测方面的研究。E-mail: dzx_civil@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划“交通基础设施”专项(No.2022YFB2603400)。

A novel method for quality control of vibratory compaction in high-speed railway graded aggregates based on the embedded locking point of coarse particles

DENG Zhi-xing1, XIE Kang1, LI Tai-feng2, WANG Wu-bin3, HAO Zhe-rui1, LI Jia-shen1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410083, China; 2. Railway Engineering Research Institute, China Academy of Railway Sciences Corporation Limited, Beijing 100081, China; 3. National Engineering Research Center of Geological Disaster Prevention Technology in Land Transportation, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 611731, China
  • Received:2023-07-10 Accepted:2023-10-07 Online:2024-06-19 Published:2024-06-20
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program “Transportation Infrastructure” Project (2022YFB2603400).

摘要: 为解决基于干密度评估压实质量所存在的压实时间不定、评价指标单一等问题,提出了一种基于粗颗粒嵌锁点的高铁级配碎石(high-speed railway graded aggregate,简称HRGA)振动压实控制新方法。首先,结合力学指标动刚度Krb和修正地基系数K20完善振动压实评估体系,进一步提出了压实控制嵌锁点Tlp指标,并通过室内试验研究了Tlp前后级配碎石的力学性能及适用性;其次,通过振动压实试验建立了Tlp与HRGA的各项性能指标之间的关系,并结合灰色关联度分析(grey relation analysis,简称GRA)算法分析了Tlp的主控特征;最后,基于机器学习(machine learning,简称ML)方法提出了Tlp预测模型,结合三层次优选体系选择最佳Tlp预测模型,并利用SHapley Additive exPlanations(SHAP)可解释性方法对最佳ML模型进行了解释。结果表明:基于Tlp可确定最优振动时间,进而控制压实质量;基于GRA算法明确Tlp的主控特征为填料最大粒径dmax、级配参数b、级配参数m、扁平细长颗粒Qe和洛杉矶磨耗LAA;计算各Tlp预测模型的综合评价指标(comprehensive evaluation index,简称CEI)依次为改进粒子群优化的人工神经网络(artificial neural networks for improved particle swarm optimization,简称IPSO-ANN)模型>改进粒子群优化的支持向量回归(support vector regression for improved particle swarm optimization,简称IPSO-SVR)模型>改进粒子群优化的随机森林(random forest for improved particle swarm optimization,简称IPSO-RF)模型,IPSO-ANN模型最佳;基于SHAP方法得到总体重要性值排序为dmax(17.31)>b(13.93)>m(6.59)>Qe(2.17)>LAA(1.54),该结果与GRA算法的结果相印证,表明SHAP方法可提升ML模型的可理解性。该研究成果可为振动压实的质量评估提供新思路,也为振动压实智能化控制提供强有力的理论支撑。

关键词: 振动压实, 高铁级配碎石, 最优振动时间, 主控特征, 机器学习, 可解释性

Abstract: To address the issues of variable compaction time and single evaluation index based on dry density assessment of compaction quality, a new method of vibratory compaction control for high-speed railway graded aggregate (HRGA) based on coarse particles embedding point is proposed. Firstly, the vibration compaction evaluation system is improved by combining the mechanical indexes of dynamic stiffness Krb and modified foundation coefficient K20. The index of compaction control “embedded locking point” Tlp is then proposed, and the mechanical properties and applicability of graded aggregates before and after Tlp are investigated through indoor tests. Secondly, the relationship between Tlp and various performance indexes of HRGA is established through vibratory compaction test, and the main controlling features of Tlp are analyzed using grey relation analysis (GRA) algorithm. Finally, the Tlp prediction model is proposed based on the machine learning (ML) method, the best Tlp prediction model is selected using the three-level preference system, and the best ML model is interpreted using SHapley Additive exPlanations(SHAP) interpretable method. The results show that the optimal vibration time can be determined based on Tlp, thereby controlling the compaction quality. The main controlling features of the Tlp are maximum particle size of filler dmax, grading parameter b, grading parameter m, flat elongated particles Qe and Los Angeles abrasion LAA based on the GRA algorithm. The comprehensive evaluation index (CEI) of each Tlp prediction model is calculated as follows: artificial neural networks for improved particle swarm optimization (IPSO-ANN) model > support vector regression for improved particle swarm optimization (IPSO-SVR) model > random forests for improved particle swarm optimization (IPSO-RF) model, with the IPSO-ANN model being optimal. The overall importance values  based on SHAP method are ranked as follows: dmax(17.31) > b(13.93) > m(6.59) > Qe(2.17) > LAA(1.54), which corroborates with the results obtained from the GRA algorithm, indicating that the SHAP method can improve the comprehensibility of the ML model. The research results can provide new ideas for quality assessment of vibratory compaction, and also provide strong theoretical support for intelligent control of vibratory compaction.

Key words: vibratory compaction, high-speed railway graded aggregate, optimal vibration time, main controlling features, machine learning, interpretable

中图分类号: U213.1
[1] 江晓童, 张西文, 吕颖慧, 李仁杰, 江浩, . 机器学习在岩土工程中的应用现状与未来展望[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 419-436.
[2] 蔡启航, 董学超, 郭明伟, 卢正, 徐安, 蒋凡, . 基于刃脚土压力的超大锚碇沉井基础下沉智能预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 377-388.
[3] 真嘉捷, 赖丰文, 黄明, 廖清香, 李爽, 段岳强. 基于时序聚类和在线学习的盾构掘进地层智能识别方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3615-3625.
[4] 赵阳, 卢正, 颜廷舟, 李剑, 唐楚轩, 邱煜, 姚海林, . 土工格室加筋路基振动压实行为及预应力效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 771-782.
[5] 贺隆平, 姚囝, 王其虎, 叶义成, 凌济锁, . 基于自动机器学习的岩爆烈度分级预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2839-2848.
[6] 龙潇, 孙锐, 郑桐, . 基于卷积神经网络的液化预测模型及可解释性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2741-2753.
[7] 杨洋, 魏怡童. 基于分类树的液化概率等级评估新方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2175-2186.
[8] 潘秋景, 吴洪涛, 张子龙, 宋克志, . 基于多域物理信息神经网络的复合地层隧道掘进地表沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 539-551.
[9] 蒋明镜, 张卢丰, 韩亮, 姜朋明, . 基于符号回归算法的结构性砂土损伤规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3768-3778.
[10] 吴爽爽, 胡新丽, 孙少锐, 魏继红, . 间歇式滑坡变形力学机制与单体预警案例研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 593-602.
[11] 董学超, 郭明伟, 王水林, . 基于LightGBM的超大沉井下沉状态预测及传感器优化布置[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1789-1799.
[12] 仉文岗, 顾鑫, 刘汉龙, 张青, 王林, 王鲁琦, . 基于贝叶斯更新的非饱和土坡参数概率 反演及变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 1112-1122.
[13] 朱晟, 卢知是, 刘纯, 王京, . 堆石体现场振动压实试验研究与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2569-2577.
[14] 张家玲,徐光辉,蔡 英. 连续压实路基质量检验与控制研究[J]. , 2015, 36(4): 1141-1146.
[15] 苏国韶,张克实,吕海波. 位移反分析的粒子群优化-高斯过程协同优化方法[J]. , 2011, 32(2): 510-515.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!