岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (7): 2175-2186.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1323

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于分类树的液化概率等级评估新方法

杨洋,魏怡童   

  1. 东北林业大学 土木与交通学院,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150006
  • 收稿日期:2023-09-06 接受日期:2023-11-09 出版日期:2024-07-10 发布日期:2024-07-23
  • 作者简介:杨洋,女,1989年出生,博士,讲师,主要从事岩土地震工程研究。E-mail: y53739623@126.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.52370128);黑龙江省博士后出站科研启动金资助(No. 41523005)。

A new method of liquefaction probability level evaluation based on classification tree

YANG Yang, WEI Yi-tong   

  1. Northeast Forestry University, School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150006, China
  • Received:2023-09-06 Accepted:2023-11-09 Online:2024-07-10 Published:2024-07-23
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(52370128) and the Postdoctoral Start-up Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (41523005).

摘要: 目前地震液化概率评估方法普遍公式形式复杂,多公式间概率计算值一致性不高,且在场地层面中液化概率意义体现不足。基于这些问题,在衡量多个概率公式方法的一致性及判别优势后,筛选各方法对现有实测历史样本的合理概率计算值标定历史样本的液化概率等级;以分类树方法建立初步液化预测模型,将其结合我国抗震设防推荐值优化后,构建一组液化概率等级评估新方法。新方法分为单孔与场地液化可能性评估两部分,为实际工程中的液化风险评估提供量化依据。与现有方法相比,新方法省略了传统方法的公式计算过程,评估过程简便,结果直观。选用新西兰地震液化数据和某实际工程场地作为检验样本,从单孔与工程场地两方面检验了新方法的可靠性和合理性。验证结果表明,新方法对单孔回判正确率达93%,对工程场地评价合理性优于现有规范。新方法可为工程场地液化可能性评估提供方法支持,具有实际工程意义。

关键词: 液化概率等级, 场地液化评估, 机器学习, 标贯

Abstract: Currently, earthquake liquefaction probability evaluation methods generally suffer from complex formula forms, inconsistent probability calculation values among multiple formulas, and insufficient significance of liquefaction probability at the site level. Based on these issues, after evaluating the consistency and discriminatory power of multiple probability formula methods, reasonable probability calculation values for existing measured historical samples were selected to calibrate the liquefaction probability levels of the samples. A preliminary liquefaction prediction model was established using the classification tree method and then optimized based on China's seismic design recommendations to develop a new method for liquefaction probability level evaluation. The new method is divided into two parts: single borehole and site liquefaction probability evaluation, which can provide a quantitative basis for liquefaction risk assessment in practical engineering. Compared with existing methods, the new method omits the traditional formula calculation process, making the evaluation process simpler and the results more intuitive. New Zealand earthquake liquefaction data and an actual engineering site were selected as test samples to validate the reliability and rationality of the new method at both the single borehole and site levels. The verification results show that the new method achieves a 93% accuracy rate for single borehole predictions and demonstrates better rationality in site evaluations compared to existing norms. The new method can provide methodological support for evaluating liquefaction probability at engineering sites and has practical engineering significance.

Key words: liquefaction probability levels, site liquefaction evaluation, machine learning, standard penetration test

中图分类号: TU 475
[1] 江晓童, 张西文, 吕颖慧, 李仁杰, 江浩, . 机器学习在岩土工程中的应用现状与未来展望[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 419-436.
[2] 蔡启航, 董学超, 郭明伟, 卢正, 徐安, 蒋凡, . 基于刃脚土压力的超大锚碇沉井基础下沉智能预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 377-388.
[3] 真嘉捷, 赖丰文, 黄明, 廖清香, 李爽, 段岳强. 基于时序聚类和在线学习的盾构掘进地层智能识别方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3615-3625.
[4] 贺隆平, 姚囝, 王其虎, 叶义成, 凌济锁, . 基于自动机器学习的岩爆烈度分级预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2839-2848.
[5] 龙潇, 孙锐, 郑桐, . 基于卷积神经网络的液化预测模型及可解释性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2741-2753.
[6] 邓志兴, 谢康, 李泰灃, 王武斌, 郝哲睿, 李佳珅, . 基于粗颗粒嵌锁点高铁级配碎石振动压实质量控制新方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1835-1849.
[7] 潘秋景, 吴洪涛, 张子龙, 宋克志, . 基于多域物理信息神经网络的复合地层隧道掘进地表沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 539-551.
[8] 蒋明镜, 张卢丰, 韩亮, 姜朋明, . 基于符号回归算法的结构性砂土损伤规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3768-3778.
[9] 杨洋, 孙锐, . 基于剪切波速的液化可能性等级评估表法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 634-644.
[10] 吴爽爽, 胡新丽, 孙少锐, 魏继红, . 间歇式滑坡变形力学机制与单体预警案例研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 593-602.
[11] 董学超, 郭明伟, 王水林, . 基于LightGBM的超大沉井下沉状态预测及传感器优化布置[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1789-1799.
[12] 仉文岗, 顾鑫, 刘汉龙, 张青, 王林, 王鲁琦, . 基于贝叶斯更新的非饱和土坡参数概率 反演及变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 1112-1122.
[13] 陈国兴 ,孔梦云 ,李小军 ,常向东 ,周国良,. 以标贯试验为依据的砂土液化确定性及概率判别法[J]. , 2015, 36(1): 9-27.
[14] 廖先斌,郭晓勇,杜 宇. 英标和国标标贯设备试验结果相关性分析[J]. , 2013, 34(1): 143-147.
[15] 苏国韶,张克实,吕海波. 位移反分析的粒子群优化-高斯过程协同优化方法[J]. , 2011, 32(2): 510-515.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!