岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (8): 2351-2361.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1432

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

脱湿路径下土体水分变化路径及体积变形对滤纸法测定土-水特征曲线的影响

叶云雪1,易博文2,刘小文2,吴珺华1,洪本根3   

  1. 1. 南昌航空大学 土木建筑学院,江西 南昌 330063;2. 南昌大学 工程建设学院,江西 南昌 330031; 3. 龙岩市稀土开发有限公司,福建 龙岩 364000
  • 收稿日期:2023-09-21 接受日期:2024-01-02 出版日期:2024-08-10 发布日期:2024-08-12
  • 作者简介:叶云雪,男,1988年生,博士,讲师,主要从事非饱和土力学与环境岩土工程等方面的科研和教学工作。E-mail: yeyunxue@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51268046,No. 51869013);江西省教育厅科学技术研究项目(No. GJJ210920)。

Influence of water change path and volume change in soil on soil-water characteristic curve measured by filter paper method under drying path

YE Yun-xue1, YI Bo-wen2, LIU Xiao-wen2, WU Jun-hua1, HONG Ben-gen3   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Nanchang Hangkong University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330063, China; 2. School of Infrastructure Engineering, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330031, China; 3. Longyan Rare Earth Development Co., Ltd., Longyan, Fujian 364000, China
  • Received:2023-09-21 Accepted:2024-01-02 Online:2024-08-10 Published:2024-08-12
  • Contact: 刘小文,男,1968年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土工程性质、边坡稳定性分析及治理等教学与科研工作。E-mail: cnliuxiaowen@126.com
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51268046, 51869013) and the Jiangxi Provincial Science and Technology Research Programs of the Education Department of China (GJJ210920).

摘要: 尽管滤纸法已被广泛应用于非饱和土-土水特性研究,但滤纸法试验数据与压力板试验数据始终存在无法连续、光滑连接的问题。为此,以收缩变形不同的两类土为研究对象,从试样水分变化路径和体积变形两个方面着手,分别开展了一系列室内压力板试验、滤纸法试验和土的收缩试验,并基于土-水特征曲线(soil-water characteristic curve,SWCC)试验结果,进行统计指标的量化分析。研究结果表明,饱和脱湿路径下的滤纸法与压力板法联合测定的SWCC试验数据能够有效地连接,而无水分变化路径下的滤纸法与压力板法各自测定的SWCC试验数据在连接时可能会错开或交叉,尤其是变形显著的土体;为了较准确地估算基于饱和度的SWCC,提出一个简单的改进法,仅需补充土的收缩试验;针对不同滤纸法试验结果呈现的差异性,给出了合理的解释。该研究结果不仅能为试验人员在同时处理滤纸法和压力板法试验数据时提供重要的理论指导,还能拓展滤纸法的适用范围。

关键词: 非饱和土, 脱湿路径, 水分变化路径, 体积变形, 土-水特征曲线

Abstract: Although the filter paper method has been widely used in the study of soil-water characteristics of unsaturated soil, the test data of the filter paper method and the pressure plate test data are always not continuous and smooth. For this reason, a series of indoor pressure plate tests, filter paper tests and soil shrinkage tests were carried out based on the water change path and volume change of the samples, and quantitative analysis of statistical indicators was conducted based on the test results of the soil water characteristic curve (SWCC). The research results show that the SWCC test data measured by the filter paper method and the pressure plate method along the drying path from saturation can be effectively connected, while the SWCC test data measured by these methods along the path without water change may be staggered or crossed during the connection, especially for the soil with significant deformation. In this paper, an improved method is proposed so as to accurately estimate the SWCC based on degree of saturation, which the soil shrinkage test is only required to supplement. A reasonable explanation is given for the differences in the performance of different filter paper method test results. The research results can not only provide important theoretical guidance for the test personnel when they deal with the test data of filter paper method and pressure plate method simultaneously, but also expand the application scope of filter paper method.

Key words: unsaturated soil, drying path, water change path, volume change, soil-water characteristic curve

中图分类号: TU 43
[1] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[2] 方薇, 吴润丰, 周春梅, . 基于包络壳模型的非饱和土朗肯被动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2885-2893.
[3] 张振光, 徐杰, 范家燊, . 不排水条件下非饱和土球孔扩张的塑性新解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1988-1996.
[4] 尚召伟, 孔令伟, 鄢俊彪, 高志傲, 王斐, 黎澄生, . 非饱和花岗岩残积土的小应变剪切模量特性与其持水特征曲线确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1131-1140.
[5] 张振光, 徐杰, 李海祥, . 考虑中间主应力的非饱和土竖井主动土压力滑移线解答[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3045-3053.
[6] 张高翔, 刘艳, 刘志强, . 土-水特征曲线的动态效应试验及模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 178-186.
[7] 周凤玺, 赵文沧. 基于土−水特征曲线的非饱和冻土未冻水含量预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2719-2727.
[8] 柳鸿博, 戴国亮, 周凤玺, 龚志宇, 陈智伟, . 黏弹性非饱和土中劲性复合桩纵向动力响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1365-1377.
[9] 彭俊国, 黄宇豪. 非饱和边坡中锚托板锚固尺寸的新算法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1003-1013.
[10] 马田田, 于海文, 韦昌富, 伊盼盼, 姚传芹, . 物理化学效应对膨胀土收缩特性的影响机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 697-704.
[11] 张思奇, 裴华富, 谭道远, 朱鸿鹄, . 单、双孔隙结构非饱和黏土孔隙分布变化规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 353-363.
[12] 陈可, 王琛, 梁发云, 汪中卫, . 考虑水力滞后与变形耦合的非饱和土持水曲线模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3694-3704.
[13] 李玉萍, 陈嘉瑞, 施建勇, 樊宝云, . 热−力耦合作用下垃圾土体积变形特性和模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 49-58.
[14] 周凤玺, 姚桃岐, 柳鸿博, . 非饱和土中Rayleigh波传播的能量特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 612-622.
[15] 邵帅, 邵生俊, 高梦洁, 刘小康, 王立新, 严广艺, . 水-力耦合非饱和黄土的弹塑性模型适用性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 436-442.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!