岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (S1): 289-298.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1484

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

穿越变化地层的沉管隧道接头地震响应的解析解

周桓竹1,刘圣安1,李斌2,陈炜昀3,苏雷4,郑俊杰1,郑烨炜1   

  1. 1. 武汉大学 土木建筑工程学院,湖北 武汉 430072;2. 中交第一航务工程有限公司,天津 300461; 3. 中山大学 土木工程学院,广东 广州 510275;4. 青岛理工大学 土木工程学院,山东 青岛 266520
  • 收稿日期:2023-09-28 接受日期:2023-11-30 出版日期:2024-09-18 发布日期:2024-09-19
  • 通讯作者: 郑烨炜,男,1989年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事加筋土结构与岩土地震工程的科研工作。E-mail: yzheng@whu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:周桓竹,男,1996年生,博士研究生,主要从事沉管隧道抗震的科研工作。E-mail: huanzhuz@whu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划青年科学家项目(No.2022YFC3080400);国家自然科学基金(No.52078236,No.51878313,No.52078392)。

Analytical solution of seismic response of flexible joint of immersed tunnel crossing different strata

ZHOU Huan-zhu1, LIU Sheng-an1, LI Bin2, CHEN Wei-yun3, SU Lei4, ZHENG Jun-jie1, ZHENG Ye-wei1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China; 2. CCCC First Harbor Engineering Company Ltd., Tianjin 300461, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510275, China; 4. School of Civil Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao, Shandong 266520, China
  • Received:2023-09-28 Accepted:2023-11-30 Online:2024-09-18 Published:2024-09-19
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R&D Programs for Young Scientists of China (2022YFC3080400) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52078236, 51878313, 52078392).

摘要: 沉管隧道接头是穿越变化地层的沉管隧道抗震设计的关键。介绍了穿越变化地层的沉管隧道接头地震响应的理论分析模型。分析模型包含两个柔性接头和3个管节单元,利用Pasternak双参数地基模型模拟下卧地层,利用Euler-Bernoulli梁模型模拟沉管隧道管节,考虑了穿越变化地层的沉管隧道接头的力和变形传递,立足于两端连接人工岛的沉管隧道类型,以自由边界模拟结构两端连接方式。基于矩阵传递原理,建立了考虑行波效应的沉管隧道接头的地震响应解析解。利用有限元模拟结果验证了解析解的可靠性。发现使用柔性接头可以明显减小变化地层界面的剪力和弯矩,自由边界条件下,接头剪切刚度主要影响接头剪力,接头弯曲刚度主要影响接头弯矩。当沉管隧道接头的受力呈现同向最大值时,对应的地震波相位角并不一致。地震波垂直入射时,接头受力最小。

关键词: 沉管隧道, 接头, 地震响应, 变化地层, 行波效应

Abstract: Flexible joint is a key factor in the seismic design of the immersed tunnel when crossing through variable strata. This paper presents a theoretical model of the seismic response of flexible joint of immersed tunnel through different strata. The analytical model consists of two flexible joints and three tube elements. The Pasternak two-parameter foundation model was used to simulate the subsoil, while the Euler-Bernoulli beam model was used to simulate the immersed tunnel. The force and deformation transmission conditions of the joint in the immersed tunnel crossing through variable strata were considered. The analysis was based on the type of immersed tunnel that connects the artificial island at both ends, and free end boundary conditions were used to simulate the connection at both ends of the tunnel. By applying the matrix transfer principle, an analytical solution was to assess the seismic response of joints in immersed tunnels, accounting for the traveling wave effect. Verification of the analysis scheme was performed using finite element simulation results, demonstrating that flexible joints can effectively reduce shear forces and bending moments at strata interfaces. Under free end boundary conditions, joint shear stiffness mainly affects the joint shear force, and joint bending stiffness mainly affects the joint bending moment. The phase angles of seismic waves differ when forces reach the maximum values. When seismic waves are vertically incident, joint experiences the minimal force.

Key words: immersed tunnel, flexible joint, seismic response, different strata, traveling wave effect

中图分类号: U459.5
[1] 宋利埼, 章敏, 徐筱, 孙静雯, 俞奎, 李昕尧, . 考虑管片接头转动效应的盾构隧道光纤反演分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2483-2494.
[2] 刘健, 夏勇, 江权, 陈涛, 贺维国, 范国刚, 熊先涛, 郑虹, . 强烈构造区硬梁包水电站地下洞室群围岩变形破坏特征与泸定地震响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2265-2280.
[3] 杨景泉, 郑长杰, 丁选明, . 竖向入射P波激励下饱和土中管桩地震响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1477-1488.
[4] 黄明华, 钟煜轩, 陆锦斌, 王克平. 基于非连续地基梁模型的基坑开挖诱发下卧盾构隧道变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 492-504.
[5] 张治国, 沃巍, 朱正国, 韩凯航, 孙苗苗, . 考虑衬砌截面协调变形约束的既有隧道受盾构下穿施工影响的Fourier能量变分解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1397-1411.
[6] 陶志刚, 丰于翔, 赵易, 张晓宇, 何满潮, 雷啸天, . 穿断层隧道NPR锚索支护体系抗震特性振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 939-949.
[7] 李文博, 甘晓露, 刘念武, 吴昊, 谌珊珊. 基于短梁−弹簧模型的盾构隧道施工期上浮变形计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3755-3767.
[8] 任璐瑶, 吴镇杰, 黄啟超, 关振长. 考虑轴力影响的盾构隧道纵向地震响应解析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 2971-2980.
[9] 申辉, 刘亚群, 刘博, 李海波, . 地震波斜入射下岩质边坡放大效应的数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 2129-2142.
[10] 吴宏, 叶治, 张宇亭, 刘华北, . 穿越不同密实度饱和砂土地层的盾构隧道地震响应三维数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1204-1216.
[11] 郑长杰, 崔亦秦, 吴琛, 罗通, 栾鲁宝, . 竖向入射S波作用下单桩水平地震响应简化解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 327-336.
[12] 张正哲, 贾科敏, 许成顺, 潘汝江. 倾斜液化场地−桩基−结构体系在近场脉冲与非脉冲地震动下地震响应差异分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3629-3638.
[13] 朱赛男, 陈艳华, 王宁, 李伟华, 张为为. 平面P1波入射下海底隧道与海床土交界面 滑移接触效应解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 3049-3058.
[14] 胡垚, 雷华阳, 雷峥, 刘英男, . 三向地震作用下叠交隧道地震响应振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 104-116.
[15] 崔臻, 盛谦, 李建贺, 付兴伟, . 蠕滑错断-强震时序作用下跨活断裂 隧道变形破坏机制初步研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1364-1373.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!