岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (S1): 496-506.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1204

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于模态分解方法的深基坑支护桩水平变形预测

李涛,舒佳军,王彦龙,陈前   

  1. 中国矿业大学(北京) 力学与建筑工程学院,北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-10 接受日期:2023-09-20 出版日期:2024-09-18 发布日期:2024-09-21
  • 作者简介:李涛,男,1981年生,博士,副教授,博士生导师,主要从事城市地下工程方面的教学和研究工作。E-mail: lit@cumtb.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(No.51508556);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(No.2022YJSLJ15);越崎青年学者资助项目(No.800015z1166)。

Horizontal deformation prediction of deep foundation pit support piles based on decomposition methods model

LI Tao, SHU Jia-jun, WANG Yan-long, CHEN Qian   

  1. School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2023-08-10 Accepted:2023-09-20 Online:2024-09-18 Published:2024-09-21
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Youth Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51508556), the Fundamental Research Fund for the Central Universities (2022YJSLJ15) and Yue Qi Young Scholars of China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing (800015z1166).

摘要: 为了预测深基坑支护桩水平变形的长期发展规律,在卷积神经网络(convolutional neural network,简称CNN)数据空间特征提取基础上,结合长短时记忆神经网络(long and short term memory,简称LSTM)分析数据的时序性和注意力机制(attention mechanism,简称AM)的划分特征权重,构建了能够预测支护桩变形的AM-CNN-LSTM模型。以北京地区某深基坑工程为背景,基于灰色关联方法明确了影响支护桩最大变形的因素,通过构建的模型分析支护桩的单点变形规律,并与反向传播神经网络(back propagation neural network,简称BPNN)、CNN和传统CNN-LSTM模型的预测所得结果进行比较分析。研究结果表明:支护桩最大变形值与深基坑开挖深度、临空天数、支撑内力、土壤性质、桩的尺寸和嵌固深度等因素关联度较高;AM机制显著提升了初始数据信息挖掘深度和变形预测精度,通过梯度下降法不断更新直至满足误差要求;与BPNN、CNN及CNN-LSTM模型相比,AM-CNN-LSTM模型的应用对于支护桩的长期变形预测稳定性较好;通过与实测数据对比,AM-CNN-LSTM模型的预测精度误差在5%~10%以内。

关键词: AM-CNN-LSTM, 深基坑, 变形预测, 神经网络, 注意力机制, 灰色关联

Abstract: In order to predict the long-term development pattern of horizontal deformation of deep foundation pit support piles, an AM-CNN-LSTM model capable of predicting the deformation of support piles was constructed based on spatial feature extraction of convolutional neural network (CNN) data combined with long and short term memory neural network (LSTM) to analyze the temporal nature of the data and the divided feature weights of attention mechanism (AM). In the context of a deep foundation pit project in Beijing, the factors affecting the maximum deformation of the supporting piles are clarified based on the gray correlation method. The constructed model was used to analyze the single-point deformation pattern of the supporting pile and to compare and analyze the results obtained from the predictions of back propagation neural network (BPNN), CNN and traditional CNN-LSTM models. The results show that the maximum deformation value of the supporting piles is highly correlated with the excavation depth of the deep foundation pit, the number of days of proximity, the internal force of the support, the nature of the soil, the size of the piles, and the embedment depth. The AM mechanism significantly improves the initial data information mining depth and deformation prediction accuracy, which is continuously updated by the gradient descent method until the error requirements are satisfied. Compared with BPNN, CNN and CNN-LSTM models, the application of AM-CNN-LSTM model is more stable for long-term deformation prediction of supporting piles. By comparing with the measured data, the prediction accuracy of the AM-CNN-LSTM model is within 5% to 10% error.

Key words: AM-CNN-LSTM, deep foundation pit, deformation prediction, neural networks, attentional mechanisms, gray associations

中图分类号: TU46+3
[1] 宋牧原, 杨明辉, 陈伟, 卢贤锥, . 基于自注意力-循环神经网络模型的盾构引发的土体沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2613-2625.
[2] 郭旭辉, 朱鸿鹄, 吴冰, 高宇新, 胡乐乐, 曹鼎峰, . 基于人工神经网络的黄土含水率光纤被动感测技术研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 653-664.
[3] 龚囱, 戚燕顺, 缪浩杰, 肖琦, 熊良锋, 曾鹏, 赵奎, . 考虑裂纹分形维数的平行黏结模型细观参数标定的神经网络模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 327-336.
[4] 肖荣军, 马威, 李锋, 袁丽云. 一种深基坑排桩支护结构内力位移矩阵分析法 解答及工程应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 579-595.
[5] 朱斌, 齐吉琳, 李江, 杨玉生, 张屹蕃, 赵博超, . 基于震害调查的土石坝震陷规律和关键影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 619-630.
[6] 魏星, 陈睿, 程世涛, 朱明, 王子健, . 成都膨胀土地区深基坑降雨稳定性分析与变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 525-534.
[7] 龙潇, 孙锐, 郑桐, . 基于卷积神经网络的液化预测模型及可解释性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2741-2753.
[8] 张文松, 贾磊, 姚荣涵, 孙立, . 基于Self-CGRU模型的地铁基坑周边地表沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2474-2482.
[9] 潘秋景, 吴洪涛, 张子龙, 宋克志, . 基于多域物理信息神经网络的复合地层隧道掘进地表沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 539-551.
[10] THENDAR Yoshua, LIM Aswin. 考虑地下连续墙接缝的深基坑RFD系统研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3717-3727.
[11] 李林, 左林龙, 胡涛涛, 宋博恺, . 基于孔压静力触探试验测试数据的原位固结系数物理信息神经网络反演方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 2889-2899.
[12] 陈保国, 贾曾潘. 近接建筑荷载作用下阳角型深基坑最佳支撑位置[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2400-2408.
[13] HANIFAH Hermil Rizki, RAHARDJO Paulus Pramono, LIM Aswin. 砂土地层圆形深基坑三维分析与测斜仪测量[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1142-1152.
[14] 马恩临, 赖金星, 王立新, 汪珂, 雷升祥, 李储军, 邱军领. 基于控制区间牵引算法的地下施工变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 577-594.
[15] 虞洪, 陈晓斌, 易利琴, 邱俊, 顾正浩, 赵辉, . 软土修正剑桥模型参数反演及其应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(11): 3318-3326.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!