岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (10): 2859-2869.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0310

• 基础理论与实验研究 •    下一篇

我国盐穴地下储库建设的挑战与对策研究——从“金坛模式”到“XX模式”

李银平1, 2, 3,马洪岭1, 2,施锡林1, 2,杨春和1, 2   

  1. 1.中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2.中国科学院大学,北京 100049; 3.中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 环境岩土工程湖北省重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-16 接受日期:2024-05-14 出版日期:2024-10-09 发布日期:2024-10-09
  • 通讯作者: 施锡林,男,1983年生,博士,研究员,主要从事盐穴深地储能方面的研究工作。E-mail: xlshi@whrsm.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:李银平,男,1969年生,博士,研究员,主要从事能源地下储备岩石力学与工程方面的研究工作。E-mail: ypli@whrsm.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No. 52374069);国家自然科学基金优秀青年科学基金(No. 52122403);中国科学院青年创新促进会优秀会员(No.Y2023089)。

Challenges and countermeasures in salt cavern underground storage in China—from “Jintan mode” to “XX mode”

LI Yin-ping1, 2, 3, MA Hong-ling1, 2, SHI Xi-lin1, 2, YANG Chun-he1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. Hubei Key Laboratory of Geo-environmental Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China
  • Received:2024-03-16 Accepted:2024-05-14 Online:2024-10-09 Published:2024-10-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (52374069), the Excellent Youth Scholars of National Natural Science Foundation of China (52122403), and the Outstanding Member of the Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS (Y2023089).

摘要: 我国盐穴地下储库建设起源于江苏金坛盐矿并获得成功,初步构建了我国盐穴储库建设首个技术标准体系。但是,我国各地盐矿的品位、埋深、矿层厚度和夹层特性等地质条件与金坛盐矿相差甚远,盐穴储库建设面临诸多挑战,不能照搬“金坛模式”。着眼于盐穴储库地质设计、造腔工程、注气排卤方案等方面,首先总结盐穴储库建库的“欧美模式”,以及基本上借鉴“欧美模式”发展形成的我国“金坛模式”的基本特征,然后结合我国已开展和正在开展的其他多座盐矿的盐穴储库建设的研究和工程实践,提出几种基于“一地一议、因矿制宜”原则的典型盐穴储库建库的“XX模式”。“XX模式”意味着是不同于金坛模式并有极大突破和变革的新型建库模式,是应对我国各地盐矿地质复杂性所带来挑战的技术方案和新思路。最后,对于下一步应对盐矿复杂地质条件带来的挑战需要突破和创新的关键理论和技术进行了展望。

关键词: 盐穴地下储库, 地质设计, 水溶造腔, 注气排卤, 沉渣空隙

Abstract: The construction of salt cavern underground storages in China originated from the Jintan salt mine in Jiangsu province, achieving success and establishing the first technical standard system for salt cavern storage construction in China. However, the geological conditions of other salt mines in China differ significantly from those of the Jintan salt mine, such as NaCl grade, buried depth, salt rock thickness, and interlayer characteristics. Therefore, the construction of salt cavern storage faces numerous challenges, and the “Jintan mode” cannot be directly replicated. Focusing on the geological design of salt cavern storage, solution mining engineering, and gas injection and brine discharge schemes, this paper firstly summarizes the “European and American mode” of salt cavern storage construction and the basic characteristics of China’s “Jintan mode”, which basically developed from the “European and American mode”. Then, based on research and engineering practices in salt cavern storage construction of other salt mines in China, several typical “XX modes” are put forward, adhering to the principle of “one solution design for one region or one salt mine”. The “XX modes” differ from the “Jintan mode”, with great breakthroughs and changes. They represent technical solutions and new ideas to deal with the geological complexities of salt mines in China. Finally, the key theories and technologies that need to be researched further in the next step to cope with geology challenges of salt mines are prospected.

Key words: salt cavern underground storage, geological design, solution mining for storage cavern, gas injection and brine discharge, sediment void

中图分类号: TE 82
[1] 施锡林,李银平,杨春和,屈丹安,马洪岭. 盐穴储气库水溶造腔夹层垮塌力学机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3615-3620.
[2] 陈 锋,杨海军,杨春和. 盐岩储气库注气排卤期剩余可排卤水分析[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3602-3606.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!