岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (11): 3173-3184.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0198

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

开口管桩循环打入过程及竖向承载特性大比尺模型试验研究

朱怀龙1, 2, 3,朱碧堂1, 2,罗如平1, 2,徐长节1, 2, 4   

  1. 1. 华东交通大学 轨道交通基础设施性能监测与保障国家重点实验室,江西 南昌 330013;2. 江西省地下空间技术开发工程研究中心, 江西 南昌 330013;3. 江西交通职业技术学院,江西 南昌 330013;4. 浙江大学 滨海和城市岩土工程研究中心,浙江 杭州 310058
  • 收稿日期:2024-02-06 接受日期:2024-03-03 出版日期:2024-11-11 发布日期:2024-11-14
  • 通讯作者: 朱碧堂,男,1974年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土工程方面研究。E-mail:btangzh@ecjtu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:朱怀龙,男,1991年生,博士研究生,主要从事海上风电基础工程方面研究。E-mail:zhuhl526@sina.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 52020105003,No. 52208343);江西教育厅科技项目(No. GJJ2205202)。

Large-scale model experimental study on cyclic penetration process and vertical bearing characteristics of open-ended pipe piles

ZHU Huai-long1, 2, 3, ZHU Bi-tang1, 2, LUO Ru-ping1, 2, XU Chang-jie1, 2, 4   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Performance Monitoring Protecting of Rail Transit Infrastructure, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330013, China; 2. Engineering Research & Development Center for Underground Technology of Jiangxi Province, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330013, China; 3. Jiangxi Vocational and Technical College of Communications, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330013, China; 4. Research Center of Coastal and Urban Geotechnical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China
  • Received:2024-02-06 Accepted:2024-03-03 Online:2024-11-11 Published:2024-11-14
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52020105003,52208343) and the Jiangxi Education Department Science and Technology Project(GJJ2205202).

摘要: 深入认识桩打入过程的桩-土作用机制对准确计算打入桩的竖向承载力十分重要。为探究砂土中开口管桩在循环打入时桩-土作用机制及打桩结束后的竖向承载特性,开展了直径为0.273 m的开口钢管桩静压循环打入过程的大比例尺(1:10)模型试验,砂土的相对密实度约为40%,通过采用光纤光栅(fiber Bragg grating,简称FBG)应变传感器和薄膜压力传感器等先进监测手段,研究循环打桩过程中土塞高度、桩身应变、轴力和侧摩阻力以及桩-土界面应力变化规律。打桩结束后,进行了休止时间分别为10 d和30 d竖向受压静载试验。随后,将基于静力触探试验CPT的ICP-05法和UWA-05法预测桩竖向承载力与静载试验测量的承载力进行对比分析。结果表明:开口管桩在静压循环打入过程中土塞效应逐渐增强,贯入结束后土塞呈部分闭塞状态;随着贯入深度的增加,靠近桩尖的应变会出现“反点”,即由贯入最后阶段的压应变转为静止稳定阶段的拉应变,而桩尖处的应变在两个阶段均为拉应变;桩身径向应力在桩尖处最大,随着h/R(h为传感器距桩尖的高度,R为桩半径)的增加而逐渐减小,具有明显的h/R效应;休止时间为10 d和30 d的极限承载力分别为289 kN和323 kN,承载力提高约12%,桩承载力具有明显的时间效应;采用ICP-05法和UWA-05法预测桩尖附近的侧摩阻力被低估,而桩尖以上侧摩阻力与实测值吻合较好,ICP-05法和UWA-05法预测桩基承载力偏保守,UWA-05法更接近实测值。

关键词: 开口管桩, 静压循环打入, 光纤光栅应变传感器, 土塞效应, 竖向承载力

Abstract: It is extremely important to understand the mechanism of pile-soil interaction during pile installation for accurately predicting its bearing capacity. This paper presents a large-scale (1:10) model test to investigate this interaction specifically for open-ended pile penetrating sandy soil. The study focuses on pile with a diameter of 0.273 m penetrating sandy soil having a relative density of approximately 40%. Advanced monitoring techniques, including fibre Bragg grating (FBG) strain sensors and thin-film pressure sensors, were employed to meticulously analyze changes in soil plug height, strain, axial force, shaft resistance, and pile-soil interfacial stress throughout the cyclic penetration process. Following pile installation, vertical compressive static load tests were conducted with intervals of 10 and 30 days, respectively, to assess the long-term performance of the piles. Subsequently, the ICP-05 method and UWA-05 method, which are based on CPT to predict the vertical bearing capacity of piles, were compared with the bearing capacity measured by static load test. The results indicate the following: Firstly, the soil plug effect of open-ended pipe piles gradually increases during cyclic penetration, and the soil plug is partially occluded at the end of penetration. Secondly, as the depth of penetration increases, an “inverse point” of strain near the pile tip emerges. Specifically, the compressive strain at the final stage of penetration changes to a tensile strain during static stabilization, while the strain at the pile tip remains tensile at both stages. Thirdly, the radial stress of the pile body peaks at the pile tip and gradually tapers off as the h/R (h is the height from the sensor to the pile tip, R is the radius of the pile) ratio increases, indicating a significant h/R effect. Fourthly, the bearing capacity of the pile increased by approximately 12%, from 289 kN after 10 days to 323 kN after 30 days, demonstrating a notable time effect. Finally, both the ICP-05 and UWA-05 methods underestimate the shaft resistance near the pile tip, while their predictions above the pile tip align closely with measured values. Overall, the predicted pile bearing capacity using both methods is conservative, with the UWA-05 method yielding closer results to the measured values.

Key words: open-end pipe pile, hydrostatic cycle penetration, fibre Bragg grating strain sensors, soil plugging effect, vertical bearing capacity

中图分类号: TU 473
[1] 陈志波, 陈峰, 翁洋, 曹光伟, 曾旭明, 潘生贵, 杨辉, . 考虑土塞效应的大直径钢管桩竖向承载力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2224-2236.
[2] 刘润, 许泽伟, 陈广思, 梁超. 饱和软黏土中回型沉垫基础竖向承载特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 381-388.
[3] 焦钰祺, 贺林林, 梁越, 刘旭菲, . 考虑结构性黏土应变软化效应的 桩靴竖向承载特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1374-1382.
[4] 万志辉, 戴国亮, 高鲁超, 龚维明, . 大直径后压浆灌注桩承载力和沉降的 实用计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2746-2755.
[5] 袁维, 刘尚各, 聂庆科, 王伟, . 基于冲切破坏模式的嵌岩桩桩端溶洞顶板 临界厚度确定方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2789-2798.
[6] 朱小军, 李文帅, 费 康, 孔伟阳, 龚维明, . 砂土中桶形基础静压沉贯过程桶-土受力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 199-206.
[7] 柳晓科,鹿 群,路士伟,刘春龙,郭少龙,. 低裙式吸力桩真空沉贯及抗拔极限承载力[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2089-2098.
[8] 王 腾, 薛 浩, 吴 瑞. 黏土中静压管桩土塞机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4335-4341.
[9] 任连伟,顾红伟,彭怀风,周 杨,. 三种工况下扩底楔形桩承载特性模型试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 1887-1893.
[10] 吴文兵,邓国栋,张家生,黄生根,. 考虑横向惯性效应时桩侧土-管桩-土塞纵向耦合振动特性研究[J]. , 2017, 38(4): 993-1002.
[11] 苏世定,杨仲轩,郭望波. 黏土中打入桩竖向承载力计算方法效果评价[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 389-393.
[12] 李 阳,张 嘎. 粉质黏土中单桩竖向承载力的离心模型试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 180-184.
[13] 刘 莹 ,黄茂松 ,李 帅 . 海上风电桩基础竖向承载力循环弱化简化分析[J]. , 2013, 34(9): 2655-2660.
[14] 詹永祥 ,姚海林 ,董启朋 ,贺东平 . 砂土中开口管桩沉桩过程的颗粒流模拟研究[J]. , 2013, 34(1): 283-289.
[15] 刘俊伟,张明义,寇海磊. 开口管桩竖向承载力时间效应研究[J]. , 2012, 33(S1): 117-122.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!