岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (11): 3345-3354.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0130

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

滑体破碎程度对滑坡涌浪特征的影响研究

李秋旺,黄波林,张鹏,成书楼,张杰   

  1. 湖北长江三峡滑坡国家野外科学观测研究站,湖北 宜昌 443002
  • 收稿日期:2024-02-06 接受日期:2024-03-03 出版日期:2024-11-11 发布日期:2024-11-15
  • 通讯作者: 黄波林,男,1979年生,博士,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事水库地质灾害及涌浪灾害方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: bolinhuang@ aliyun.com
  • 作者简介:李秋旺,男,1999年生,博士研究生,主要从事地质灾害及涌浪灾害方面的研究工件。E-mail: 2321518499@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. U23A2045);重庆市规划和自然资源局科研项目(No. KJ-2023046);中国三峡集团公司项目(No. YM(BHT)/(22)022)。

Influence of the degree of landslide fragmentation on the characteristics of landslide impulse wave

LI Qiu-wang, HUANG Bo-lin, ZHANG Peng, CHENG Shu-lou, ZHANG Jie   

  1. Hubei Yangtze Three Gorges Landslide National Field Scientific Observation and Research Station, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China
  • Received:2024-02-06 Accepted:2024-03-03 Online:2024-11-11 Published:2024-11-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation (U23A2045), the Scientific Research Project of Chongqing Planning and Natural Resources Bureau (KJ-2023046) and China Three Gorges Group Corporation project (YM(BHT)/(22)022).

摘要: 滑坡岩土体在运动过程中大多会发生切割性破碎,破碎滑体入江会强烈影响产生的涌浪特征;破碎滑体造浪效应尚需进一步揭示。基于大型三维滑坡涌浪缩尺物理试验,开展了不同滑体破碎程度下的滑坡产生涌浪物理试验,对破碎滑体的造浪效应进行分析。研究结果表明,随着滑体破碎程度的增加,涌浪第一波峰、最大波高及传播速度均呈减小的趋势。其中,滑体破碎程度从小到大,涌浪最大波幅减小幅度依次为8.84%、19.75%,首浪最大波高减小幅度依次为12.49%、21.13%。通过试验现象可知,滑体破碎程度主要通过控制滑体运动速度和滑体-水体相互作用过程对涌浪特征造成影响;并基于滑体-水体相互作用,提出滑体结构重组、渗透流、涌浪波消减3种作用机制。这些新认识揭示了滑坡运动-破碎-造浪特征,深化了滑坡涌浪形成机制研究。

关键词: 滑体, 破碎程度, 涌浪特性, 作用机制

Abstract: Most of the landslide rock and soil masses undergo cutting and fragmentation during movement, and the entry of the fragmented sliding mass into the river significantly affects the characteristics of the resulting impulse waves. The wave-making effect of the fragmented sliding mass still needs further exploration. Based on large-scale three-dimensional landslide impulse wave scale physical experiments, physical experiments were conducted to investigate the generation of impulse waves from landslides under varying degrees of sliding mass fragmentation, and the wave-making effect of the fragmented sliding mass was analyzed. The results indicate that as the degree of fragmentation of the sliding mass increases, the first peak, maximum wave height, and propagation velocity of the impulse wave all exhibit a decreasing trend. Specifically, as the degree of fragmentation increases, the maximum amplitude of the impulse wave decreases by 8.84% and 19.75%, respectively, and the maximum wave height of the first wave decreases by 12.49% and 21.13%, respectively. Through experimental observations, it is evident that the degree of fragmentation of the sliding mass primarily influences the characteristics of the impulse wave by controlling the velocity of the sliding mass and the interaction process between the sliding mass and the water body. Based on the sliding mass-water interaction, three mechanisms are proposed: sliding mass structure reorganization, seepage flow, and impulse wave attenuation. These new insights reveal the characteristics of landslide movement, fragmentation, and wave-making, and deepen our understanding of the formation mechanism of landslide impulse waves.

Key words: sliding body, degree of fragmentation, impulse wave characteristics, genesis mechanism

中图分类号: TU 441
[1] 卢钦武, 关振长, 林林, 吴淑婧, 宋德杰. 基于静力推覆试验的山岭隧道衬砌-地层相互作用机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2318-2326.
[2] 张院生, 雷云超, 强小俊, 吴东东, 王东坡, 王计华, . 多排微型桩框架结构加固边坡离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1983-1994.
[3] 年廷凯, 张放, 郑德凤, 李东阳, 沈月强, 雷得浴, . 基于计算流体力学-离散元法耦合方法的海底 黏性滑坡体运动行为模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(11): 3174-3184.
[4] 毛坚强,徐 骏,杨 磊,. 滑体段采用m法模型的抗滑桩计算方法[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1197-1202.
[5] 卢坤林,王运敏,朱大勇,. 三维滑体锚固力计算方法及工程应用[J]. , 2017, 38(2): 501-506.
[6] 侯公羽 ,李晶晶 ,杨 悦 ,王亚潇 ,李庆伟 ,梁永辉,. 围岩弹塑性变形条件下锚杆、喷混凝土和U型钢的支护效果研究[J]. , 2014, 35(5): 1357-1366.
[7] 刘永超 ,郑 刚. 软土地区扩孔灌浆预制管桩承载力研究[J]. , 2011, 32(7): 1984-1990.
[8] 黎高辉,吴从师,邓泷波,韦晓阳,黎 晨. 悬索桥隧道式锚碇和下穿公路隧道相互作用机制研究[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 363-369.
[9] 陈庆发,周科平. 低标号充填体对采矿环境结构稳定性作用机制研究[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2811-2816.
[10] 汪 洋,周 丽,殷坤龙. 基于土条周边水压力分析的水下滑体稳定性研究[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1068-1071.
[11] 吴江斌 ,王卫东 ,黄绍铭 . 扩底抗拔桩扩大头作用机制的数值模拟研究[J]. , 2008, 29(8): 2115-2120.
[12] 何思明,李新坡,王成华. 高切坡超前支护锚杆作用机制研究[J]. , 2007, 28(5): 1050-1054.
[13] 刘艳章,王水林,葛修润,周 平. 高密度电法在三峡库区滑坡勘察中的应用[J]. , 2006, 27(S1): 519-523.
[14] 周青春 ,余仁强 ,袁卫兵,. 全长粘结锚杆在崩滑体治理工程中的应用[J]. , 2005, 26(S2): 163-166.
[15] 许 江 ,李克钢 ,陈 萍 ,刘玉洪,. 丰都名山崩滑体失稳的离散元模拟[J]. , 2004, 25(11): 1819-1822.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!