岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (11): 3378-3387.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1954

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于剪切波速的砾性土液化概率计算的中国方法

袁近远1, 2, 3,苏安双2,陈龙伟3,许成顺4,王淼2,袁晓铭3,张思宇3   

  1. 1. 黑龙江省水利科学研究院,黑龙江 哈尔滨 100050;2. 黑龙江科技大学 建筑工程学院,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150027; 3. 中国地震局工程力学研究所,黑龙江 哈尔滨150080;4. 北京工业大学 城市建设学部,北京 100124
  • 收稿日期:2023-12-30 接受日期:2024-03-27 出版日期:2024-11-11 发布日期:2024-11-15
  • 通讯作者: 袁晓铭,男,1963年生,博士,研究员,主要从事土动力学与地震工程研究。E-mail: yxmiem@163.com
  • 作者简介:袁近远,男,1996年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩土防灾工程工作。E-mail: yuanjy34@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 52408525);北京工业大学城市与工程安全减灾教育部重点实验室基金项目(No. 2024B03)。

The Chinese method for calculating the liquefaction probability of gravelly soils based on shear wave velocity

YUAN Jin-yuan1, 2, 3, SU An-shuang2, CHEN Long-wei3, XU Cheng-shun4, WANG Miao2, YUAN Xiao-ming3, ZHANG Si-yu3   

  1. 1. Heilongjiang Hydraulic Research Institute, Harbin, Heilongjiang 100050, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Heilongjiang University of Science and Technology, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150027, China; 3. Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150080, China; 4. Faculty of Urban Construction, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
  • Received:2023-12-30 Accepted:2024-03-27 Online:2024-11-11 Published:2024-11-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52408525) and the Key Laboratory of Urban and Engineering Safety and Disaster Reduction, Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology (2024B03).

摘要: 砾性土地震液化风险评价是我国工程防震减灾面临的新问题,原位剪切波速试验是具有普适性的技术手段,但现有方法不适用于中国。建立中国模式下基于剪切波速的砾性土液化概率计算新方法,并与已有的基于地震循环剪应力比CSR(cyclic stress ratio)理论建立的CYY(Cao,Youd and Yuan,简称CYY)计算方法进行对比。采用实测数据和不同概率下液化临界线模型的对比分析表明,所提出的中国模式基于剪切波速的砾性土液化概率计算新方法,解决了CYY方法不适用我国的问题,且模型构造较CYY方法先进,克服了CYY方法难以兼顾不同砾性土层埋深和不同地震动强度的缺点。无论是退化为概率0.5的确定性判别结果,还是实测数据下液化概率计算的可靠性,本方法均优于CYY方法。提出的公式已被具有我国样板规范性质的《建筑工程抗震性态设计通则》修订版采纳,可为相关规范修订及工程应用提供指导与技术支持。

关键词: 砾性土, 剪切波速, 液化概率, 中国方法

Abstract: Assessing the risk of earthquake-induced liquefaction in gravelly soils is a new challenge faced by earthquake prevention and disaster reduction efforts in China's engineering sector. In situ shear wave velocity testing is a universally applicable technical method; however, existing methods are not suitable for China. This study establishes a new method for calculating the liquefaction probability of gravelly soils based on shear wave velocity under the Chinese model, and compared it with the CYY (Cao, Youd and Yuan) method, which is based on the CSR (cyclic stress ratio) theory. The comparative analysis using measured data as well as different probability liquefaction threshold models indicates that the proposed Chinese model for calculating the liquefaction probability of gravelly soils based on shear wave velocity can solve the problem of CYY method unsuitable for China and is more advanced than the CYY method. It overcomes the shortcomings of the CYY method, which struggles to simultaneously consider different burial depths of gravelly soil layers and the effects of varying seismic intensities. Both in the deterministic discrimination with a probability of 0.5 and in the reliability of liquefaction probability calculation under measured data, the method proposed in this paper outperforms the CYY method. The proposed formula in this paper has been adopted in the revised version of the General Rules for Performance-Based Seismic Design of Buildings, serving as a model for China, and can provide guidance and technical support for related specifications and engineering applications.

Key words: gravelly soils, shear wave velocity, liquefaction probability, Chinese method

中图分类号: TU 472
[1] 张涛艺, 王家全, 林志南, 唐毅, . 细粒含量对砾性土路基劣化及静力剪切特性影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1141-1152.
[2] 杨洋, 魏怡童. 基于分类树的液化概率等级评估新方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2175-2186.
[3] 李金宇, 王伟, 王浩宇, 杨研科, 徐凯放, 张晓庆, 熊文. 地震序列作用下液化场地条件影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1551-1559.
[4] 张锋, 唐康为, 尹思琪, 冯德成, 陈志国, . 冻融粉质黏土的剪切波速与动态回弹模量及其转换关系[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 221-233.
[5] 杨洋, 孙锐, . 基于剪切波速的液化可能性等级评估表法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 634-644.
[6] 王家全, 畅振超, 唐毅, 唐滢, . 循环荷载下加筋砾性土填料的动三轴试验分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 2851-2860.
[7] 陈国兴, 丁杰发, 方怡, 彭艳菊, 李小军, . 场地类别分类方案研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(11): 3509-3522.
[8] 杨志勇, 王勇, 孔令伟, 桂彬, 陈楷文, . 基于剪切波速的海底含气沉积物卸荷扰动 与样品质量评价方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(11): 3687-3694.
[9] 杨洋, 孙锐, 陈卓识, 袁晓铭. 基于土层常规参数的剪切波速液化概率计算公式[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2755-2764.
[10] 陈卓识, 袁晓铭, 孙锐, 王克. 土层剪切波速不确定性对场地刚性判断的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2748-2754.
[11] 朱雨萌, 吴 琪, 陈国兴, . 基于颗粒接触状态理论的砂-粉混合料 剪切波速试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1457-1464.
[12] 孔梦云 ,陈国兴 ,李小军 ,常向东 ,周国良,. 以剪切波速与地表峰值加速度为依据的地震液化确定性及概率判别法[J]. , 2015, 36(5): 1239-1252.
[13] 何先龙 ,赵立珍 ,佘天莉,. 基于能量变化率法自动拾取场地剪切波速[J]. , 2015, 36(3): 847-853.
[14] 丁伯阳,张 勇. 杭州第四系软土动力特性试验与土结构性影响的探讨[J]. , 2012, 33(2): 336-342.
[15] 何先龙,赵立珍. 基于多重互相关函数分析剪切波速[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2541-2545.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!