岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (11): 3447-3460.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1880

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

CO2多层注入下盖层密闭性影响因素研究

马纪元1, 2,程国强3,李霞颖1, 2,杨凌雪3,李琦1, 2,马晶3,陈博文1, 2, 杨川枫3,张瑶1, 2,李凤洋3,余涛1, 2,虎亭3,许宗红3,钟屹岩1, 2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所,岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071; 2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049;3. 宁夏回族自治区水文环境地质调查院,宁夏 银川 750011
  • 收稿日期:2023-12-15 接受日期:2024-06-27 出版日期:2024-11-11 发布日期:2024-11-15
  • 通讯作者: 程国强,男,1985年生,本科,工程师,主要从事水工环地质与CCUS的研究工作。E-mail: chenggq0088@126.com
  • 作者简介:马纪元,男,1999年生,硕士研究生,主要从事CO2地质封存与利用等研究工作。E-mail:majiyuan999999@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金联合基金重点项目(No. U2244215);湖北省自然科学基金创新群体项目(No. 2021CFA030);宁夏二氧化碳地质封存调查、试验与示范项目(No. TZZD/NZC220120C)。

Influencing factors of caprock sealing performance for multi-layer CO2 injection

MA Ji-yuan1, 2, CHENG Guo-qiang3, LI Xia-ying1, 2, YANG Ling-xue3, LI Qi1, 2, MA Jing3, CHEN Bo-wen1, 2, YANG Chuan-feng3, ZHANG Yao1, 2, LI Feng-yang3, YU Tao1, 2, HU Ting3, XU Zong-hong3, ZHONG Yi-yan1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region Institute of Hydroenvironmental Geology, Yinchuan, Ningxia 750011, China
  • Received:2023-12-15 Accepted:2024-06-27 Online:2024-11-11 Published:2024-11-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Innovative Group Project of the Joint Funds of National Natural Science Foundation of China (U2244215), the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (2021CFA030) and the Ningxia Carbon Dioxide Geological Storage Survey, Test and Demonstration Project (TZZD/ NZC220120C).

摘要: 中国大多数CO2储层具有非均质性、低渗等特征,仅在单一储层内进行CO2封存难以满足中国减排的需求。为了实现大规模CO2地质封存,多层注入技术被提出以增加CO2地质封存量。为探究CO2多层注入条件下盖层密闭性的主要影响因素,通过渗流-应力耦合模拟分析,以孔压、位移和库仑破坏应力增量ΔCFS作为评价盖层密闭性状态的依据,并采用龙卷风分析法进行敏感性分析,筛选出对盖层密闭性影响较大的因素。研究结果表明:注入层数越多,盖层的位移、孔压和ΔCFS越小,盖层密闭性越好,但层数超过3层,层数带来的增效将不再显著;盖层密闭性的主控因素有盖层泊松比与杨氏模量、储层厚度与渗透系数和注入速率;最厚盖层的位置在整个地层的最上部时,盖层密封效果最好,产生垂直位移、孔压和ΔCFS最小。

关键词: CO2地质封存, 盖层密闭性, 多层注入, 敏感性分析, 库仑破坏应力

Abstract: Due to the heterogeneity and low permeability of most CO2 reservoirs in China, CO2 storage within a single reservoir is difficult to meet the demand for emission reduction. To achieve large-scale CO2 geological storage, multi-formation injection technology has been proposed to increase the amount of CO2 geological storage. To explore the main influencing factors on the caprock sealing performance under the condition of multi-formation CO2 injection, the seepage-stress coupling simulation analysis was carried out. Pore pressure, displacement, and incremental Coulomb failure stress (ΔCFS) are used as the basis for evaluating the caprock sealing performance. The tornado analysis method was used for sensitivity analysis to select the factors that have a significant impact on the caprock sealing performance. The research results indicate that the more injection layers, the smaller the displacement, pore pressure, and ΔCFS of the caprock, and the better the caprock sealing performance. However, if the number of layers exceeds 3, the efficiency increase brought by the number of layers will no longer be significant; The main controlling factors for the sealing performance of the caprock include the Poisson’s ratio and Young’s modulus of the caprock, thickness and permeability coefficient of the reservoir, and injection rate; When the thickest caprock is located at the topmost part of the entire formation, the caprock sealing performance is the best, producing the smallest vertical displacement, pore pressure, and ΔCFS.

Key words: CO2 geological storage, caprock sealing performance, multi-formation injection, sensitivity analysis, Coulomb failure stress

中图分类号: TU 42
[1] 冯世进, 徐熠, 杨俊毅, 郑奇腾, 张晓磊, . 基于集对-组合赋权的填埋场失稳风险评价方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2129-2139.
[2] 曹建军, 胡斌, 王泽祺, 李京, . 基于分数阶积分的软弱夹层蠕变损伤模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 454-464.
[3] 陈博文, 李琦, 谭永胜, 余涛, 高文彬, 李霞颖, 申筛成, . 不同有效应力下泥岩盖层二氧化碳突破压力演化特征的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3681-3693.
[4] 李翔, 王靖童, 魏恒. 多失效模式下基于区间非概率的岩质隧道稳定可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2409-2418.
[5] 陈勇, 苏剑, 曹玲, 王力, 王世梅, . 基于数据挖掘的土−水特征曲线演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 23-34.
[6] 周兵红. 一种预测砂土土-水特征曲线的简化方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 222-228.
[7] 刘小虎, 姚直书, 程桦, 查文华, 吴捷豪, . 深井穿尖交岔点突变失稳机制分析及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 521-531.
[8] 李志浩, 肖世国. 不同运动模式的悬臂式挡墙地震永久位移算法[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 723-734.
[9] 李见飞, 苏杨, 孙志彬, 赵晨, . 基于Newmark滑块原理的抗滑桩加固 三维土坡的地震位移分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2785-2795.
[10] 吴顺川, 孙伟, 刘洋, 成子桥, 许学良, . Ⅰ型断裂韧度模拟方法及细观影响因素研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2536-2546.
[11] 张强, 李小春, 周英博, 石露, 白冰, . 高压孔隙CO2/水作用下完整四川三叠系 砂岩剪切特性的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3028-3036.
[12] 郭重阳,李典庆,曹子君,高国辉,唐小松. 考虑空间变异性条件下的边坡稳定可靠度高效敏感性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2203-2210.
[13] 伍海清,白 冰,李小春,刘明泽,何媛媛, . CO2地质封存中储层流体压力演化规律的解析模型[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2099-2105.
[14] 李凯达,胡少斌,李小春,伍 键,樊清怡,伍海清,. 单相流体对砂岩强度特性的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1789-1795.
[15] 陈卫忠,马永尚,于洪丹,龚 哲,李香玲,. 泥岩核废料处置库温度-渗流-应力耦合参数敏感性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 407-416.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!