岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (11): 3481-3490.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1929

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    

分数阶黏弹性饱和地基中大直径管桩竖向动力响应分析

周凤玺1,孙烈璞1,柳鸿博2,曹小林1,梁玉旺1   

  1. 1. 兰州理工大学 土木工程学院,甘肃 兰州 730050;2. 东南大学 土木工程学院,江苏 南京 211189
  • 收稿日期:2023-12-15 接受日期:2024-03-01 出版日期:2024-11-11 发布日期:2024-11-15
  • 通讯作者: 孙烈璞,男,2000年生,硕士研究生,主要从事桩基动力学方面的科研工作。E-mail: sunliepu@163.com
  • 作者简介:周凤玺,男,1979年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土工程方面的教学与研究。E-mail: geolut@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 12362032);甘肃省重点研发计划(No. 23YFFA0063)。

Vertical dynamic response analysis of large diameter piles in fractional viscoelastic saturated foundation

ZHOU Feng-xi1, SUN Lie-pu1, LIU Hong-bo2, CAO Xiao-lin1, LIANG Yu-wang1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, Gansu 730050, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211189, China
  • Received:2023-12-15 Accepted:2024-03-01 Online:2024-11-11 Published:2024-11-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (12362032) and Gansu Provincial Research and Development Program (23YFFA0063).

摘要: 管桩作为一种常用的桩基础,在实际工程中被广泛应用,其动力响应分析具有重要研究价值。基于弹性动力学原理和黏弹性饱和土模型,考虑了土骨架的非流动黏性和管桩的横向惯性效应,研究了分数阶黏弹性饱和土中大直径管桩在竖向动载荷作用下的动力特性。首先,基于Biot动力固结理论和分数阶标准线性固体(fractional-order standard linear solid,简称FSLS)模型,建立了分数阶黏弹性饱和土在柱坐标系下的波动方程。其次,基于Rayleigh-Love杆模型并考虑管桩的横向惯性效应,推导了管桩的桩顶动阻抗解析解答。最后,通过算例分析,研究了分数阶模型参数、管桩横向惯性效应、桩长和土体渗透力对管桩桩顶动阻抗的影响规律。结果表明:饱和土体骨架FSLS模型参数中分数阶数和应变松弛时间的增大以及应力松弛时间的减小都会增大桩顶动阻抗;管桩的横向惯性效应在高频区段对降低桩顶动阻抗尤为明显;缩小管桩外半径和扩大其内半径以及增加桩长,降低土体渗透性均有助于提高桩顶动阻抗。

关键词: 管桩, 饱和土, 分数阶黏弹性, 横向惯性效应, 动阻抗

Abstract: As a commonly used pile foundation, tubular piles are widely used in practical engineering, and their dynamic response analysis has important research value. Based on the principle of elastic dynamics and viscoelastic saturated soil model, the dynamic characteristics of large-diameter tubular piles in fractional-order viscoelastic saturated soil under vertical dynamic load are investigated by taking into account the immobile viscosity of the soil skeleton and the lateral inertia effect of the tubular piles. Firstly, the fluctuation equations of fractional-order viscoelastic saturated soil in column coordinate system were established based on Biot's dynamic consolidation theory and fractional-order standard linear solid (FSLS) model. Secondly, based on the Rayleigh-Love rod model and considering the lateral inertia effect of the tubular piles, the analytical solution of the pile top dynamic impedance of the tubular piles is derived. Finally, the effects of fractional order model parameters, lateral inertia effect of tubular piles, pile length and soil permeability on the dynamic impedance of pile top of tubular piles are investigated by example analysis. The results show that: the increase of fractional order and strain relaxation time and the decrease of stress relaxation time in the FSLS model parameters of saturated soil skeleton increase the dynamic impedance at the top of the pile; the transverse inertia effect of tubular piles is especially obvious in the high-frequency section to reduce the dynamic impedance at the top of the pile; and the reduction of the outer radius of tubular piles and enlargement of the inner radius of tubular piles, as well as the increase of the pile length and decrease of the permeability of the soil body all help to improve the dynamic impedance at the top of the pile.

Key words: pipe pile, saturated soil, fractional viscoelasticity, transverse inertia effect, dynamic stiffness

中图分类号: TU 473
[1] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[2] 方薇, 吴润丰, 周春梅, . 基于包络壳模型的非饱和土朗肯被动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2885-2893.
[3] 谢宏丽, 周志军, 任玉波, 田叶青, 范经灿. 大直径预应力钢筋混凝土管桩群桩的水平承载性能[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2573-2585.
[4] 陈志波, 陈峰, 翁洋, 曹光伟, 曾旭明, 潘生贵, 杨辉, . 考虑土塞效应的大直径钢管桩竖向承载力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2224-2236.
[5] 张振光, 徐杰, 范家燊, . 不排水条件下非饱和土球孔扩张的塑性新解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1988-1996.
[6] 杨景泉, 郑长杰, 丁选明, . 竖向入射P波激励下饱和土中管桩地震响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1477-1488.
[7] 尚召伟, 孔令伟, 鄢俊彪, 高志傲, 王斐, 黎澄生, . 非饱和花岗岩残积土的小应变剪切模量特性与其持水特征曲线确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1131-1140.
[8] 常洪林, 孔纲强, 王福慧, 王成龙, 周杨, . 褥垫层作用下预应力高强混凝土能量桩热力响应特性现场试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1240-1251.
[9] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[10] 张振光, 徐杰, 李海祥, . 考虑中间主应力的非饱和土竖井主动土压力滑移线解答[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3045-3053.
[11] 叶云雪, 易博文, 刘小文, 吴珺华, 洪本根, . 脱湿路径下土体水分变化路径及体积变形对滤纸法测定土-水特征曲线的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2351-2361.
[12] 林浩, 郑长杰, 丁选明, . 层状地基中海洋大直径管桩水平动力响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1873-1883.
[13] 柳鸿博, 戴国亮, 周凤玺, 龚志宇, 陈智伟, . 黏弹性非饱和土中劲性复合桩纵向动力响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1365-1377.
[14] 彭俊国, 黄宇豪. 非饱和边坡中锚托板锚固尺寸的新算法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1003-1013.
[15] 王长虹, 杨天笑, 马铖涛, 沈洋. 束浆挤扩钢管桩竖向抗拔承载力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 846-856.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!