岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (12): 3658-3667.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0496

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

调控层胶结充填体三轴压缩力学性能及破坏特征研究

徐文彬1,赵康奇1,张亚伦1,刘成保1,周磊2   

  1. 1. 中国矿业大学(北京) 能源与矿业学院,北京 100083;2. 安徽马钢矿业资源集团有限公司,安徽 马鞍山 243000
  • 收稿日期:2024-04-22 接受日期:2024-08-12 出版日期:2024-12-09 发布日期:2024-12-04
  • 作者简介:徐文彬,男,1985年生,博士,副教授,主要从事充填采矿理论与技术、矿山压力与岩层控制及排土场边坡的研究。 E-mail: xuwb08@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    中央高校基本业务费(No.2023JCCXNY01);重点研发计划项目(No.2022AB31022)。

Mechanical properties and failure characteristics of strengthening stratified cemented tailings backfill under triaxial compression

XU Wen-bin1, ZHAO Kang-qi1, ZHANG Ya-lun1, LIU Cheng-bao1, ZHOU Lei2   

  1. 1. School of Energy and Mining Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China; 2. Anhui Masteel Mining Resources Group Co., Ltd., Maanshan, Anhui 243000, China
  • Received:2024-04-22 Accepted:2024-08-12 Online:2024-12-09 Published:2024-12-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2023JCCXNY01) and the Key Technologies Research & Development Program (2022AB31022).

摘要: 为了解决阶段空场嗣后充填法二步骤矿柱开采时一步骤采场充填体易失稳垮塌的难题,提出了充填调控层理念,以增强一步骤采场充填体的稳定性。借助三轴压缩试验仪,分析了不同调控层高度、主体层灰砂比和围压对充填体力学性能及破坏规律的影响,探究了单层充填体与含调控层充填体偏应力−应变曲线特征及破坏模式的差异性。结果表明:调控层强化了充填体的屈服阶段,进而提高了其峰值强度;调控层占比不变时,主体层灰砂比越小,强化效果越好;主体层灰砂比不变时,调控层占比越大,强化效果越好;围压与充填体峰值强度呈对数函数关系,表观黏聚力c、表观内摩擦角φ 值与充填体的主体层灰砂比、调控层占比大小呈线性相关;未添加调控层充填体的破坏形式以斜剪切裂纹为主,添加调控层后则以剪切、拉伸以及混合破坏3种形式为主;调控层占比不变,主体层灰砂比较小时,拉伸裂纹贯穿调控层;验证了含调控层充填体配比1:20−2/5(表示充填体的主体层灰砂比为1:20,调控层占比为整体的2/5)替代某矿原充填体配比(1:7−0)的可行性, 1:20−2/5单位体积充填体可节约6.85%水泥用量。研究结果可为节约矿山充填成本和提高作业安全提供一定的理论指导。

关键词: 调控层, 胶结充填体, 力学性能, 应力-应变曲线, 破坏模式

Abstract: In order to solve the collapsible difficulties of primary stope in subsequent stoping backfilling method, the idea of strengthening stratified structure in primary stoping backfill is put forward. The effect of strengthening stratified height, cement-to- tailings ratio and confining pressure on the mechanical properties and failure rules of cemented tailings backfill (CTB) is investigated by the triaxial compressive testing. The difference of deviational-stress-strain curves and failure modes between CTB and strengthening stratified CTB is investigated. The results show that the yield phase and peak strength of CTB are enhanced by the strengthening stratified structure in CTB. When the strengthening stratified thickness keeps constant, the strengthening effect is raised as the cement-to-tailings ratio in the main layer become lower. Moreover, the cement-to-tailings ratio in the main layer remains unchanged, the strengthening effect is advanced by the increase of strengthening stratified thickness as well. The peak strength of CTB is logarithmically increased with confining pressures, and the apparent cohesion and friction angle are linearly increased with cement-to-tailings ratio in the main layer and strengthening stratified thickness. The failure mode of CTB without strengthening stratified structure is mainly dominated by an oblique shear crack, and the strengthening stratified CTB presents three failure modes: shear, tensile and mixed. When the cement-to-tailings ratio in the main layer is low, tensile cracks run through the strengthening stratified structure. The feasibility of 1:7−0 backfill replaced by 1:20−2/5 is verified, and the backfill cost of 1:20−2/5 can be saved by 6.85% cement cost, where 1:20 is cement-to-tailings ratio, and 2/5 is the proportion of strengthening stratified. The results can provide theoretical references for saving backfill cost and improving operation safety.

Key words: strengthening stratified structure, cemented tailings backfill, mechanical property, stress-strain curves, failure mode

中图分类号: TU457
[1] 张春瑞, 纪洪广, 付桢, 张月征, 宋宇, 田竹华, 范文博, . 白云石对粉砂岩物理力学性质影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2661-2675.
[2] 刘健, 夏勇, 江权, 陈涛, 贺维国, 范国刚, 熊先涛, 郑虹, . 强烈构造区硬梁包水电站地下洞室群围岩变形破坏特征与泸定地震响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2265-2280.
[3] 储超群, 包兴佳, 毛明发, 吴顺川, 崔贺佳, . 深地灰岩三轴压缩声发射特征及破坏形式试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2049-2061.
[4] 祁凯, 万志辉, 戴国亮, 胡涛, 周峰, 张鹏, . 基于不同注浆材料固化钙质砂的力学性能试验及微观机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1825-1838.
[5] 郑舒文, 刘松玉, 李迪, 童立元, 吴恺, . 膨胀土基泡沫轻质土力学性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1455-1465.
[6] 唐先习, 张徐军, 李昊杰, . 钢渣-煤矸石地聚合物固化黄土的力学特性评价与固化原理分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1205-1214.
[7] 汪昕, 幸安康, 曾子强, 姜祎, 徐建宇, 王晓南, 刘造保, . 层理铁矿石剪切力学性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1039-1048.
[8] 杨柳, 杨铎, 何满潮, . 基于纳米划痕的陆相页岩纹层界面过渡区分布范围定量研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 353-367.
[9] 陶高梁, 周恒洁, 肖衡林, 周宏豫, . 新型边坡防护生态基材的力学-植生性能与抗冲刷效果研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3018-3032.
[10] 杨科, 于祥, 何祥, 侯永强, 张连富, . 不同含水状态矸石胶结充填体能量演化与损伤特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 26-42.
[11] 邓东平, 徐润冬, 彭一航, 文莎莎. 强度空间非均质性与各向异性特征下边坡稳定性极限平衡滑面应力法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 55-72.
[12] 范浩, 王磊, 罗勇, 朱传奇, . 卸荷损伤砂岩的分级加载三轴蠕变力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 277-288.
[13] 高荡, 彭俊, 王航龙, 王林飞, 彭坤, . 含层理砂岩真三轴条件下力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 349-358.
[14] 刘鹏, 曹源兴, 程钰, 白云波, . 碳酸酐酶增强微生物矿化固土效果的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2554-2564.
[15] 韩勇, 李树忱, 袁超, 冯现大, 王修伟, . 单轴压缩下薄喷裂隙红砂岩力学性质与裂纹扩展特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2583-2594.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!