岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (1): 213-224.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0328

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

静载和动力扰动联合作用下砂岩时滞性破坏试验研究

黄叶宁1,邓华锋1,李建林1,王明洋2,张景昱1,周书桓1,徐鹏飞1   

  1. 1.三峡大学 三峡库区地质灾害教育部重点实验室,湖北 宜昌 443002;2.陆军工程大学 爆炸冲击防灾减灾全国重点实验室,江苏 南京 210007
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-19 接受日期:2024-06-06 出版日期:2025-01-10 发布日期:2025-01-04
  • 通讯作者: 邓华锋,男,1979年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土工程方面的研究工作。E-mail:dhf8010@ctgu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:黄叶宁,女,1993年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土工程方面的研究工作。E-mail:hyn@ctgu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.U22A20600,No.U2034203)

Experimental study on time-delayed failure of sandstone under the combined action of static load and dynamic disturbance

HUANG Ye-ning1, DENG Hua-feng1, LI Jian-lin1, WANG Ming-yang2, ZHANG Jing-yu1, ZHOU Shu-huan1, XU Peng-fei1   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Geological Hazards on Three Gorges Reservoir Area, Ministry of Education, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation of Explosion and Impact, Army Engineering University of PLA, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210007, China
  • Received:2024-03-19 Accepted:2024-06-06 Online:2025-01-10 Published:2025-01-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U22A20600, U2034203).

摘要: 地下工程施工过程中岩爆的发生与岩石时滞性破坏特性密切相关,而且开挖爆破、机械钻凿等动力扰动直接影响岩爆的形成过程。基于此,特开展不同幅值和频率动力扰动作用下的砂岩时滞性破坏试验,分析动力扰动作用对岩石时滞性破坏的影响规律及机制。研究表明:(1)不同幅值(8%~24%)和频率(0.2~1.0 Hz)扰动作用下岩样破坏孕育时间显著缩短,相较无扰动作用岩样破坏孕育时间缩短了39.49%~98.21%;随着扰动荷载频率和幅值增大,岩样加速变形阶段持续时间占比逐渐减小,破坏突发性增强。(2)随着扰动荷载幅值和频率增加,岩样破坏时的片状剥落现象逐渐减弱,裂纹产生的随机性明显增强,说明动力扰动荷载改变了岩样的时滞性破坏形式和程度。(3)动力扰动作用下岩样损伤变量随扰动时间呈倒S型增长规律,建立了考虑静载和动力扰动作用的岩石时滞性累积损伤模型。(4)静力加载阶段岩样积聚大量弹性能并造成初始损伤,动力扰动作用加剧了损伤演化进程并不断诱发新的损伤,扰动作用幅值和频率增加均会加速岩石损伤进程,使得试样承载能力下降,进而诱发岩爆。相关研究成果可为深部岩体工程动力触发时滞性岩爆分析解释提供较好的参考。

关键词: 动力扰动, 时滞性, 岩爆, 幅值, 频率, 能量

Abstract: The occurrence of rock bursts during underground engineering construction is closely related to the time-delay failure characteristics of rocks. Dynamic disturbances such as excavation blasting and mechanical drilling directly impact the formation process of rock bursts. Time-delay failure tests on sandstone under dynamic disturbances of varying amplitudes and frequencies were conducted to analyze their impact and mechanism on rock failure delays. Research findings indicate: 1) Under different amplitudes (8%–24%) and frequencies (0.2–1.0 Hz) of disturbances, the incubation time for rock sample failure significantly shortens, by 39.49%–98.21% compared to undisturbed conditions. With increasing frequency and amplitude of the disturbance load, the proportion of the accelerated deformation stage duration in the rock sample gradually decreases, leading to an increase in the sudden failure. 2) Increasing amplitude and frequency of disturbance loads weaken the flaky peeling phenomenon during rock sample failure and increase the randomness of crack generation, altering the time-delay failure form and degree of rock samples. 3) The damage variable of rock samples under dynamic disturbance exhibits an inverted S-shaped growth pattern over time. A time-delay cumulative damage model for rocks considering static loads and dynamic disturbances has been developed. 4) During the static loading stage, the rock sample accumulates elastic energy and incurs initial damage. The dynamic disturbance intensifies the damage evolution process, leading to continuous induction of new damage. Increasing amplitude and frequency of the disturbance accelerates rock damage, causing a reduction in sample bearing capacity and ultimately triggering rock burst. These research findings can provide valuable references for analyzing and interpreting time-delayed rock bursts induced by dynamic forces in deep rock mass engineering.

Key words: dynamic disturbance, time-delayed, rockburst, amplitude, frequency, energy

中图分类号: TU 452
[1] 张春瑞, 纪洪广, 付桢, 张月征, 宋宇, 田竹华, 范文博, . 白云石对粉砂岩物理力学性质影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2661-2675.
[2] 黄德昕, 温韬, 陈宁生, . 考虑能量演化的岩石残余强度确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2825-2836.
[3] 余小越, 许明, 谢强, 蔡宇, 刘先珊, 甘峰帆, . SH波在三角形山体地形中的散射与能量分布规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2639-2649.
[4] 张培森, 王洪伟, 洪荒, 许大强, 陈增宝, 邓云驰, 梁展, 李金坤, 陈文豪, 崔乾, . 渗流-采动应力耦合作用下深部砂岩力学及能量演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1997-2010.
[5] 唐巨鹏, 黄磊, 潘一山, 任凌冉, 张昕, 张众华, . 煤层倾角突变区煤与瓦斯突出模拟试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1719-1730.
[6] 韩世迎, 王航龙, 彭俊, 朱君星, 王林飞, 潘堃, . 结构面影响深埋隧道硬质围岩岩爆特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1765-1776.
[7] 常洪林, 孔纲强, 王福慧, 王成龙, 周杨, . 褥垫层作用下预应力高强混凝土能量桩热力响应特性现场试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1240-1251.
[8] 林韩祥, 冯雪峰, 张强勇, 段抗, 张修峰, 刘传成, 陈长鹏, 赵钰, . 高位厚硬岩层破断力学机制分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1264-1277.
[9] 苏永华, 杨忠武, 岳梢, 李明. 基于四边形孔静力定向裂岩的断裂评判标准研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 695-705.
[10] 郑路, 陈元睿, 吴怡涵, 张学略, 毕钰璋, . 节理影响下的滚石碰撞破碎规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 729-749.
[11] 王成, 李起航, 王春, 任雨蒙, 李润泽. 含内套环储能花岗岩单一径向压缩下的力学特性及能量演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3694-3706.
[12] 孙思瑞, 杜献杰, 冯国瑞, 刘文昊, 王军. 不同加载速率下岩充组合体的协同破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3501-3512.
[13] 张凌博, 孙宜松, 程星磊, 郭群录, 赵川, 刘京红. 基于损伤能量耗散的三维土体切削破坏面表征方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3626-3636.
[14] 吴迪, 陈嵘, 孔纲强, 牛庚, 缪玉松, 王振兴. 冷-热循环温度下桥梁能量排桩热-力响应特性现场试验与数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3649-3660.
[15] 何颖, 陈雅, 尹奔驰, 刘中宪, 刘旭, . 频率相关等效线性山谷交错场地多点地震动模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3280-3288.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!