岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5): 1429-1441.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0924CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.0924

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究

刘红帅1,杨健生1,宋东松2,孙强强1   

  1. 1. 河北大学 建筑工程学院,河北 保定 071002; 2. 石家庄铁道大学 省部共建交通工程结构力学行为与系统安全国家重点实验室,河北 石家庄 050043
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-25 接受日期:2024-09-30 出版日期:2025-05-06 发布日期:2025-05-06
  • 通讯作者: 宋东松,男,1994年生,博士研究生,主要从事场地地震响应研究。E-mail: 18233295386@163.com
  • 作者简介:刘红帅,男,1975年生,博士,研究员,硕士生导师,主要从事液化场地地震工程研究。E-mail: liuhs1975@hbu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    中国地震局工程力学研究所基本科研业务费专项资助项目(No. 2019EEEVL0202);河北省自然科学基金项目(No. E2024201045);河北省高等学校科学技术研究项目(No. ZD2020157)。

Centrifuge modeling on ground response of dry sand site under near-fault pulsed and non-pulsed ground motions

LIU Hong-shuai1, YANG Jian-sheng1, SONG Dong-song2, SUN Qiang-qiang1   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior and System Safety of Traffic Engineering Structure, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050043, China
  • Received:2024-07-25 Accepted:2024-09-30 Online:2025-05-06 Published:2025-05-06
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Scientific Research Fund of Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration (2019EEEVL0202), the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province(E2024201045) and the Science & Technology Research Project of Higher Education Institutions in Hebei Province (ZD2020157).

摘要: 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用对结构反应的影响差异显著,但其对场地地震动参数的影响研究鲜见。为此,设计完成了50g(g为重力加速度)离心加速度条件下干砂场地的离心振动台模型试验。模型场地采用相对密度为50%的福建标准细砂;选取Loma Prieta地震近场东西向Saratoga-Aloha Ave台站的脉冲加速度记录和Capitola台站的非脉冲加速度记录作为振动台台面输入;场地中心布设竖向加速度计阵列和地表竖向位移计,模型箱体外侧布设水平向位移计阵列,用于分析干砂场地在近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下的响应差异和研究场地地震动参数与输入地震动加速度峰值间的关联性。模型试验结果表明:与非脉冲地震动作用相比,脉冲地震动总体上降低了场地峰值加速度放大系数,增加了场地的最终震陷量;增大了深层土层(>15 m)的峰值水平位移,显著减小了场地浅层(<5 m)的峰值水平位移。统计结果表明,场地地震动参数(地表峰值加速度放大系数、场地震陷、浅表峰值水平位移和Arias强度)均与输入地震动加速度峰值有很高的相关性,拟合决定系数R2≥0.97。成果为进一步采用数值模拟研究近场脉冲地震动对场地地震响应的影响提供了可靠的试验基础。

关键词: 干砂自由场地, 地震反应, 脉冲地震动, 非脉冲地震动, 离心振动台模型试验

Abstract: The effects of near-fault pulsed and non-pulsed ground motions on structural responses differ significantly, yet their impacts on site ground motion parameters remain unclear. Therefore, a centrifuge shaking table model test of a dry sand site under 50g (g represents the acceleration caused by gravity) centrifugal acceleration was designed and conducted. The model site consisted of Fujian standard fine sand with a relative density of 50%. The pulsed acceleration record from Saratoga Aloha Ave station and the non-pulsed record from Capitola station, both within the near-fault range in the east-west direction of the Loma Prieta earthquake, were selected as inputs for the shaking table. An accelerometer vertical array and surface settlement gauge were placed at the center of the site, while horizontal displacement gauges were fixed on the lateral outside of the model box. This setup was used to compare the response differences of the dry sand site under near-fault pulsed and non-pulsed ground motions and to evaluate the correlations between site ground motion parameters and the peak acceleration values of the input ground motion. The model test results show that compared to non-pulsed ground motions, pulsed ground motions significantly reduce the amplification factors of peak acceleration but increase the final surface settlements of the site. For peak horizontal displacement, pulsed ground motions increase the peak displacements in the deep soil layer (> 15 m) but significantly reduce them in the shallow layer (< 5 m). Statistical results reveal high correlations between site seismic response parameters (amplification factors of peak surface acceleration, surface settlement, shallow peak horizontal displacement, Arias intensity) and the input peaks acceleration of ground motion, with all fitting coefficients R² greater than or equal to 0.97. These results provide a reliable experimental basis for further numerical simulations to study the impact of near-fault pulsed ground motions on site seismic response.

Key words: dry sand free site, seismic response, pulsed ground motion, non-pulsed ground motion, centrifugal shaking table test

中图分类号: TU 411
[1] 马建勋, MOHAMMED El Hoseny, 庞盼望, 李文枭, 闫洪祥. 考虑土−结构相互作用的地下室层对高层建筑地震反应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2808-2822.
[2] 王永光, 梁建文, 巴振宁, . 基于修正阻尼的土体非线性模型及其在Abaqus中的实现[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2287-2296.
[3] 贾科敏, 许成顺, 杜修力, 张小玲, 宋佳, 苏卓林, . 可液化倾斜场地的侧向扩展机制分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1837-1848.
[4] 朱升冬, 陈国兴, 陈炜昀, 高文生, 李文彪, . 土的次非线性对桩基核岛结构三维地震反应的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1501-1511.
[5] 张正哲, 贾科敏, 许成顺, 潘汝江. 倾斜液化场地−桩基−结构体系在近场脉冲与非脉冲地震动下地震响应差异分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3629-3638.
[6] 钟紫蓝, 史跃波, 李锦强, 赵 密, 杜修力. 考虑土体动力特征参数相关性的工程场地 随机地震反应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(7): 2015-2024.
[7] 陈国兴, 李磊, 丁杰发, 赵凯, . 巨厚沉积土夹火山岩场地非线性地震反应特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 3056-3065.
[8] 潘旦光, 程业, 陈清军. 地下商场结构对地面运动影响的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1134-1145.
[9] 许紫刚, 杜修力, 许成顺, 张驰宇, 蒋家卫. 地下结构地震反应分析中场地瑞利阻尼 构建方法比较研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4838-4847.
[10] 朱 姣,许汉刚,陈国兴, . 苏州第四纪深厚沉积层一维等效线性和非线性地震反应对比分析[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1479-1490.
[11] 李瑞山,袁晓铭,李程程. 水平成层场地动剪应变与震动速度关系解析[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3623-3630.
[12] 杨笑梅,赖强林. 二维土层地震反应分析的时域等效线性化解法[J]. , 2017, 38(3): 847-856.
[13] 邢浩洁,李鸿晶,杨笑梅,. 基于切比雪夫谱元模型的成层场地地震反应分析[J]. , 2017, 38(2): 593-600.
[14] 雷素素,高永涛 ,潘旦光 , . 考虑辐射阻尼的土-结构相互作用体系等效输入[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 583-590.
[15] 陈继彬,赵其华,彭社琴,丁梓涵,喻豪俊. 弃土堆填对斜坡输电塔桩基地震反应的影响[J]. , 2015, 36(8): 2277-2283.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!