岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5): 1455-1465.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.1011CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.1011

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

膨胀土基泡沫轻质土力学性能试验研究

郑舒文1, 2,刘松玉1, 2,李迪3,童立元1, 2,吴恺1, 2   

  1. 1. 东南大学 岩土工程研究所,江苏 南京 211189;2. 南京现代综合交通实验室,江苏 南京 211100; 3. 南京地铁小镇开发建设集团有限公司,江苏 南京 211135
  • 收稿日期:2024-08-14 接受日期:2024-11-04 出版日期:2025-05-06 发布日期:2025-05-06
  • 通讯作者: 刘松玉,男,1963年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事特殊地基处理、原位测试技术等方面的研究工作。E-mail: liusy@seu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:郑舒文,女,2000年生,硕士研究生,主要从事膨胀土路基方面的研究工作。E-mail: 220223232@seu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No. 52478388)

Experimental study on mechanical properties of expansive soil-based lightweight foam soil

ZHENG Shu-wen1, 2, LIU Song-yu1, 2, LI Di3, TONG Li-yuan1, 2, WU Kai1, 2   

  1. 1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211189, China; 2. Nanjing Modern Multimodal Transportation Laboratory, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211100, China; 3. Nanjing Metro Town Development and Construction Group Co., Ltd., Nanjing, Jiangsu, 211135, China
  • Received:2024-08-14 Accepted:2024-11-04 Online:2025-05-06 Published:2025-05-06
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (52478388).

摘要: 膨胀土是一种分布广泛的特殊黏土,无法直接应用于工程中。为寻找膨胀土路基高效填筑方式,提出了一种采用膨胀土制备泡沫轻质土、完全消除膨胀性的技术思路。通过流值测试、干燥收缩试验、pH值测试、抗压试验,对不同水固比、湿密度、膨胀土掺量条件的膨胀土基轻质土(expansive soil-based lightweight soil,简称E-LS)物理力学性能开展了系统研究。通过正交试验定量分析各影响因素对无侧限抗压强度qu的影响规律,提出了E-LS强度确定方法。试验结果表明:利用膨胀土制备E-LS从根本上改变了膨胀土结构,完全消除了膨胀土的膨胀性,其强度随湿密度、养护龄期增加而增大。膨胀土掺量为30%~60%时,28 d无侧限抗压强度qu-28 d在0.21~1.58 MPa之间,其中湿密度为900 kg/m3、膨胀土掺量为50%、水固比为0.8的E-LS,qu-28 d可达到0.92 MPa,满足路基填筑要求。影响抗压强度因素排序为膨胀土掺量>湿密度>水固比,建立了E-LS强度预测模型。E-LS可以满足不同工程填筑要求,并具有去膨胀、免压实、施工方便等优点,具有良好的工程应用前景。

关键词: 膨胀土, 泡沫轻质土, 胀缩特性, 力学性能, 路基填料

Abstract: Expansive soil, a commonly distributed clay, is unsuitable for direct engineering applications. This study proposes a method to produce foam lightweight soil from expansive soil, effectively mitigating its expansive properties. The physical and mechanical properties of expansive soil-based lightweight soil (E-LS) were systematically investigated under varying water-solid ratios, wet densities, and expansive soil contents, using tests for flow value test, drying shrinkage test, pH test, and compressive strength test. An orthogonal experiment was conducted to quantify the influence of these factors on unconfined compressive strength (qu), leading to the development of a strength determination method. The results show that the preparation of E-LS modifies the expansive soil structure, completely eliminating its expansiveness. Compressive strength of E-LS increases with both wet density and curing age. For expansive soil contents ranging from 30% to 60%, the unconfined compressive strength at 28 days (qu-28 d) varied from 0.21 MPa to 1.58 MPa. Specifically, for E-LS with 50% expansive soil content, a water-to-solid ratio of 0.8, and a wet density of 900 kg/m3, the qu-28 d reached 0.92 MPa, meeting the requirements for embankment construction. The factors affecting compressive strength are ranked as expansive soil content > wet density > water-solid ratio, and a predictive model for E-LS strength was developed. E-LS exhibits the capability to fulfill diverse embankment filling requirements in engineering applications, while demonstrating distinct advantages including expansive property mitigation, compaction-free implementation, and construction efficiency, thereby presenting significant potential for practical engineering deployment.

Key words: expansive soil, foam light soil, expansion and contraction characteristics, mechanical properties, subgrade filler soil

中图分类号: TU 411
[1] 张春瑞, 纪洪广, 付桢, 张月征, 宋宇, 田竹华, 范文博, . 白云石对粉砂岩物理力学性质影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2661-2675.
[2] 祁凯, 万志辉, 戴国亮, 胡涛, 周峰, 张鹏, . 基于不同注浆材料固化钙质砂的力学性能试验及微观机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1825-1838.
[3] 姜海波, 卢燕, 李琳, 张军, . 干湿-冻融作用输水渠道膨胀土强度特性及损伤演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1356-1367.
[4] 欧阳淼, 张红日, 王桂尧, 邓人睿, 郭鸥, 汪磊, 高游, . 基于响应面法的生物基质改良膨胀土配比优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1368-1378.
[5] 唐先习, 张徐军, 李昊杰, . 钢渣-煤矸石地聚合物固化黄土的力学特性评价与固化原理分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1205-1214.
[6] 周振华, 孔令伟, 李甜果, 舒荣军, . 原状膨胀土裂隙演变性状的环境效应与表征[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 402-412.
[7] 张荣, 赵斌, 郑小川, 陈令, 卢正, 赵阳, . 新型盐渍土基泡沫轻质土隔断层阻盐机制及效果研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 515-526.
[8] 陶高梁, 周恒洁, 肖衡林, 周宏豫, . 新型边坡防护生态基材的力学-植生性能与抗冲刷效果研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3018-3032.
[9] 陈康, 刘先峰, 蒋关鲁, 袁胜洋, 马杰, 陈忆涵, . 干湿循环下石灰改良红层泥岩填料力学性能劣化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 43-54.
[10] 陈熠坤, 储亚, 蔡国军, 闫超, 刘松玉, 韩爱民, . 基于低频电法的原位膨胀土膨胀性评价应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 147-155.
[11] 汪淼, 任昊铭, 王凡超, 章定文, . 黏土含量对沿河公路路基抗冲刷性能的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 187-194.
[12] 张红日, 杨济铭, 徐永福, 肖杰, 韩仲, 汪磊, 林宇亮, . 基于数字图像相关技术的膨胀土三维裂隙扩展特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 309-323.
[13] 郭建华, 王汉辉, 李世昌, 戴张俊, . 干湿环境下膨胀土裂隙演化规律及渠坡变形研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 433-442.
[14] 黎宇, 胡明鉴, 郑思维, 王志兵, . 电石渣-矿渣固化膨胀土强度及微观机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 461-470.
[15] 魏星, 陈睿, 程世涛, 朱明, 王子健, . 成都膨胀土地区深基坑降雨稳定性分析与变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 525-534.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!