岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (7): 2281-2295.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0223CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0223

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

混凝土坝坝基立体排水的数值模拟与优化设计

任旺1, 2,苗君3,雷万钧1, 2,王络1, 2,陈益峰1, 2   

  1. 1.武汉大学 水资源工程与调度全国重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430072;2.武汉大学 水工岩石力学教育部重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430072; 3.中国电建集团贵阳勘测设计研究院有限公司,贵州 贵阳 550000
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-03 接受日期:2025-04-28 出版日期:2025-07-10 发布日期:2025-07-09
  • 通讯作者: 陈益峰,男,1974年生,博士、教授,博士生导师,主要从事水工渗流与多场耦合方面的研究工作。E-mail: csyfchen@whu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:任旺,男,1997年生,博士研究生,主要从事裂隙岩体渗流分析与控制方面的研究工作。E-mail: deblin@whu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.U2340228,No.52494972);湖北省自然科学基金项目(No.2022CFA028)

Numerical modeling and design optimization of a 3D cross-connected drain system in a concrete dam foundation

REN Wang1, 2, MIAO Jun3, LEI Wan-jun1, 2, WANG Luo1, 2, CHEN Yi-feng1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Water Resources Engineering and Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Rock Mechanics in Hydraulic Structural Engineering (Ministry of Education), Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China; 3. Power China Guiyang Engineering Corporation Limited, Guiyang, Guizhou 550000, China
  • Received:2025-03-03 Accepted:2025-04-28 Online:2025-07-10 Published:2025-07-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.U2340228, 52494972) and the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (2022CFA028).

摘要: 排水是高坝工程最经济有效的渗流控制措施,纵横交错的排水廊道和俯仰并用的排水孔群构成立体排水,但其准确模拟一直是水利水电工程渗流分析的难点之一。长期的研究表明,排水本质上是通过边界条件对渗流场起控制作用的,其边界条件有水头边界条件、零流量边界条件、潜在溢出边界条件和水头-潜在溢出混合边界条件4类。然而,当排水的边界条件指定错误,或缺乏可靠的排水边界转换算法时,排水的模拟和渗流场的计算可能产生显著偏差,甚至错误。结合某拟建的200 m级碾压混凝土重力坝,总结了高坝坝基立体排水对渗流场的控制机制,明确了水头-潜在溢出混合边界满足的流量自平衡关系式,给出了排水俯孔边界条件的自动转换算法。对水库蓄水过程中坝基非稳定渗流场的计算分析表明,立体排水精细模拟的核心是确定满足水头-潜在溢出混合边界条件的排水俯孔,当这部分排水孔被错误指定为零流量边界条件(即认定为失效)时,地下水自由面将被高估1.7~10.6 m;而当其被错误指定为水头边界条件(即认为孔口发生溢流)时,地下水自由面则将被高估达29.4~94.5 m。与以往的认知不同,这部分排水孔尽管孔口无溢流,但通过孔内的流量自平衡关系,将汇入排水孔的地下水排向附近更低高程的排水孔,因而也很好地起到了降低坝基渗透压力的作用。此外,通过对排水孔间距的优化分析表明,工程上广泛应用的3 m间距是合适的,但建议增大坝基右岸2 928 m高程灌排廊道下游侧附近排水孔的间距。研究成果对高坝工程防渗排水设计与渗流安全评价具有重要指导意义。

关键词: 排水孔, 边界条件, 混凝土坝, 非稳定渗流, 优化设计

Abstract: Drainage is one of the most cost-effective and important seepage control measures in high-dam engineering. The multiple levels of drainage tunnels and the upwards- and downwards-drilled drainage holes constitute the 3D cross-connected drain system, but accurately modeling the drains has been one of the difficulties in the seepage analysis in hydraulic engineering. Long-term studies have shown that drains function by presenting discharge boundaries, which can be characterized by water head, no-flux, unilateral or mixed water head-unilateral boundary condition. However, it may result in erroneous modeling of the drains and the seepage field when the drain boundary conditions are incorrectly prescribed, or there lacks reliable transition algorithm for drain boundary conditions. Based on a proposed 200-m roller compacted concrete gravity dam, the control mechanism of the 3D cross-connected drain system on the seepage field is summarized, the self-equilibrated relationship of flow rate characterized by the water head-unilateral boundary condition is clarified, and the automatic transition algorithm of the boundary conditions for downwards-drilled drainage holes is presented. The simulation results of the transient seepage flow in the dam foundation show that, the core of accurately modeling the 3D cross-connected drain system is to locate the downwards-drilled drainage holes that characterized by the water head-unilateral boundary condition. When these boreholes are erroneously prescribed with no-flux boundary condition (i.e., recognized as failed), the phreatic surface is overestimated by 1.7−10.6 m; when they are erroneously prescribed with water head boundary condition (i.e., overflow occurs through their upper ends), the phreatic surface is overestimated by up to 29.4−94.5 m. Different from previous studies, the boreholes still perform well in lowering the groundwater level and pore water pressure in the dam foundation by their own self-equilibrated relationship of flow rate, where the seeped water is collected and discharged to lower boreholes, even no overflow occurs. Besides, the optimization analysis of the drain spacing implies that a drain spacing of 3 m commonly used in engineering practices is suitable, but a larger spacing of drainage holes could be suggested for those drilled downwards from the longitudinal drainage tunnel at elevation 2 928 m on the right bank. The research results are of great significance for the design and seepage safety evaluation of seepage control system of high dams.

Key words: drainage hole, boundary condition, concrete dam, transient seepage flow, design optimization

中图分类号: TU 377
[1] 秦立科, 郭瑞琦, 赵皓辰, 甄刚, 王琦, . 环境蒸发条件下石质文物毛细水动态分布规律影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 354-365.
[2] 周晓敏, 马文著, 张松, 宋宜祥, 刘勇, 和晓楠, . 渗流条件下隧道锚注复合围岩体的解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 206-220.
[3] 杜炜, 聂如松, 李列列, 谭永长, 张杰, 祁延录, . 考虑不同边界条件的风积沙−土工格栅拉拔试验离散元模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1849-1862.
[4] 郑紫荆, 朱云海, 王巧, 谢海建, 陈赟, . 有机污染物在含土工膜复合隔离墙 和含水层系统的运移半解析模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(2): 453-465.
[5] 凌道盛, 赵天浩, 钮家军, 朱松, 单振东, . 混合非齐次边界下非饱和土一维固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 883-891.
[6] 年庚乾, 陈忠辉, 张凌凡, 包敏, 周子涵. 边坡降雨入渗问题中两种边界条件的 处理及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(12): 4105-4115.
[7] 谢芸菲, 迟世春, 周雄雄, . 复杂环境中大规模桩筏基础的优化设计方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 486-493.
[8] 蒋中明, 刘澧源, 赵海斌, 唐 栋, 胡 炜, 梅松华, 李 鹏, . 地下储气库热力耦合数值分析动态边界条件研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1149-1157.
[9] 陈昌富, 邱琳淇, 毛凤山, 周志军, . 基于加权扰动共生生物搜索算法 桩网复合地基优化设计[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4477-4485.
[10] 刘世伟,盛 谦,朱泽奇,龚彦峰,崔 臻,李建贺,张善凯,. 隧道围岩内地下水渗流边界效应影响研究[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4001-4009.
[11] 邓高阳,肖 明,陈俊涛. 基于变分不等式的地下洞室渗流边界模拟[J]. , 2017, 38(3): 762-768.
[12] 韩昌瑞 ,白世伟 ,王玉朋 ,张东焕,. 层状岩体深埋长隧道锚杆支护优化设计[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 409-414.
[13] 薛海斌,党发宁,尹小涛,丁卫华,刘海伟,. 非稳定渗流条件下非饱和土质边坡稳定性的矢量和分析法研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 49-56.
[14] 李 赞 ,雷国辉,付崔伟, . 砂墙地基二维固结自由应变解[J]. , 2016, 37(6): 1613-1622.
[15] 李 浪,王明洋,范鹏贤,程怡豪,李治中,蒋海明. 深地下工程模型试验加卸载装置的研制[J]. , 2016, 37(1): 297-304.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!