岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (8): 2325-2338.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.1029CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.1029

• 基础理论与实验研究 •    下一篇

桩靴贯入及拔出对邻近吸力基础运动规律和水平承载力的影响

张雨坤1,张恒1,李大勇1, 2,项乾1   

  1. 1. 山东科技大学 土木工程与建筑学院,山东 青岛 266590;2. 中国石油大学(华东) 储运与建筑工程学院,山东 青岛 266580
  • 收稿日期:2024-08-19 接受日期:2025-02-05 出版日期:2025-08-11 发布日期:2025-08-13
  • 作者简介:张雨坤,男,1987年生,博士,教授,主要从事海洋岩土工程研究工作。E-mail:philc007@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 52371301);山东省高等学校青年创新团队支持计划。

Influence of spudcan penetration and extraction on motion behavior and lateral bearing capacity of adjacent suction caisson

ZHANG Yu-kun1, ZHANG Heng1, LI Da-yong1, 2, XIANG Qian1   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, Shandong 266590, China; 2. College of Pipeline and Civil Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao, Shandong 266580, China
  • Received:2024-08-19 Accepted:2025-02-05 Online:2025-08-11 Published:2025-08-13
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52371301) and the Introduction and Education Plan for Young Innovative Talents in Colleges and Universities of Shandong Province.

摘要: 开展模型试验和数值模拟,研究了桩靴贯入及拔出对邻近吸力基础运动规律和水平承载力的影响。结果表明,插桩过程中,临近吸力基础运动模式为“转动+平动+竖向运动”相结合,吸力基础发生水平向远离桩靴平动和竖向上拔运动;而拔桩过程中吸力基础会发生水平向远离桩靴平动和竖向沉降运动。桩靴插拔时,吸力基础最大水平与竖向位移量随插桩深度和插桩间距的增加逐渐增大。此外,桩靴插拔造成吸力基础水平承载力具有显著方向性特点。桩靴拔出后吸力基础在不同方向水平承载力大小依次是:沿桩靴与吸力基础中心连线偏向桩靴方向<沿桩靴与吸力基础中心连线远离桩靴方向<桩靴与吸力基础中心连线垂直方向。桩靴插桩间距为2.5倍吸力基础直径时,各方向水平承载力均无降低情况。当桩靴插拔区位于吸力基础加载方向前侧或后侧时,水平荷载下基础周围土体变形沿加载方向对称分布;当桩靴插拔区位于吸力基础加载方向两侧时,土体变形范围不再沿着加载方向对称分布。桩靴插拔导致水平荷载作用下吸力基础周围土体变形范围显著减小。基于模型试验和三维大变形数值模拟结果,研究了不同比尺下桩靴插拔对吸力基础水平承载力的影响,构建了模型试验与原型实际之间的关联,使试验结果更好地指导工程实践。

关键词: 桩靴贯入与拔出, 吸力基础, 运动规律, 水平承载力, 土体变形

Abstract: Model tests and numerical simulation were conducted to study the effects of spandcan penetration and extraction on the motion behavior and lateral bearing capacity of adjacent suction caissons. Results indicate that during spudcan penetration, the suction caisson experiences a combination of rotational, horizontal, and vertical movements. The suction caisson moves horizontally away from the spandcan and vertically upwards during penetration, while it experiences horizontal movement away from the spandcan and vertical settlement during extraction. The maximum horizontal and vertical displacements of the suction caisson increase with increasing the spudcan penetration depth and spacing. In addition, the lateral bearing capacity of the suction caisson exhibits significant directional characteristics influenced by spandcan penetration and extraction. The lateral bearing capacity of the suction caisson after spandcan extraction varies in different directions as follows: along the direction of the line connecting the spandcan and the center of the suction caisson, toward the spandcan < away from the spandcan < perpendicular to the line connecting the spandcan and the suction caisson center. When the spacing between the spudcan and the suction caisson is 2.5 times the diameter of the suction caisson, the lateral bearing capacity in all directions remains unaffected. When the spandcan penetration and extraction area is behind the suction caisson loading direction, the soil deformation around suction caisson distributes symmetrically along the loading direction. When the spandcan penetration and extraction area is on both sides of the suction caisson loading direction, the soil deformation range no longer distributes symmetrically along the loading direction. The penetration and extraction of the spandcan reduces the range of the deformation of the soil under horizontal loading. Based on model tests and three-dimensional large deformation numerical simulation results, the impact of spudcan penetration and extraction on the lateral bearing capacity of suction caisson in different scales was studied. The correlation between model tests and prototype reality was established, enabling the test results to better guide engineering practice.

Key words: spudcan penetration and extraction, suction caisson, motion behavior, lateral bearing capacity, soil deformation

中图分类号: TU 473
[1] 谢宏丽, 周志军, 任玉波, 田叶青, 范经灿. 大直径预应力钢筋混凝土管桩群桩的水平承载性能[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2573-2585.
[2] 周光远, 干飞, 郑刚, 周海祚, 王宏, 毕靖, 刘彪, 张元胤, . 基于土体变形的端承桩负摩阻力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 930-942.
[3] 季慧, 彭宇, 吴则祥, 涂冬媚, . 砂土中吸力筒基础抗拔数值模拟研究: 系泊深度效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2187-2194.
[4] 董恒年, 孔纲强, 周杨, 杨庆, . 考虑系泊点深度的单点系泊系统锚桩水平承载性能理论分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1356-1364.
[5] 江杰, 付臣志, 柴文成, 欧孝夺, . 砂土地基中桩顶竖向-水平加载路径下柔性单桩水平承载力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1375-1384.
[6] 张昕, 董浩, 徐迎迎, 王柳月, . 竖向循环荷载作用下砂土中单桩承载特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 673-684.
[7] 郭景琢, 郑刚, 赵林嵩, 潘军, 张宗俊, 周强, 程雪松, . 多排孔注浆引起土体变形与孔压规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 896-907.
[8] 郭凯丰, 张仪萍. 双层地基中气体聚集与土体变形机制的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 99-108.
[9] 王心博, 王路君, 朱斌, 王鹏, 袁思敏, 陈云敏, . 水合物储层伺服降压开采模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2360-2370.
[10] 张雨坤, 秦廷辉, 李大勇, 王冲冲, . 分层土中裙式吸力基础吸力沉贯特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1317-1325.
[11] 史旦达, 俞快, 毛逸瑶, 原媛, 郝冬雪, 胡伟, . 松砂中双叶片螺旋锚上拔承载 及土体变形特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(11): 3059-3072.
[12] 刘志鹏, 孔纲强, 文磊, 王志华, 秦红玉, . 砂土地基中倾斜螺旋桩群桩上拔与水平 承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(7): 1944-1950.
[13] 张玉, 李大勇, 梁昊, 张雨坤, . 风电空心锥形基础水平承载特性 及土压力分布规律模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1404-1412.
[14] 李大勇, 张景睿, 张雨坤, 高玉峰, 刘俊伟, . 饱和砂土中裙式吸力基础水平循环特性和 累积转角变化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 611-619.
[15] 万志辉, 戴国亮, 龚维明, 高鲁超, 徐艺飞, . 钙质砂后压浆桩水平承载性状模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 411-418.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!