岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (8): 2516-2531.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.1452CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.1452

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

含深大裂隙陡崖式岩溶山体采动破坏与失稳机制

熊飞1, 2,刘新荣2, 3,刘文武2,钟祖良2, 3,杨忠平2, 3, 王南云2,王浩2,薛熠1   

  1. 1. 西安理工大学 土木建筑工程学院,陕西 西安 710048; 2. 重庆大学 土木工程学院,重庆 400045; 3. 重庆大学 煤矿灾害动力学与控制全国重点实验室,重庆 400044
  • 收稿日期:2024-11-22 接受日期:2025-02-05 出版日期:2025-08-11 发布日期:2025-08-15
  • 通讯作者: 刘新荣,男,1969年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土力学与地下工程等领域的教学与科研工作。E-mail: liuxrong@126.com
  • 作者简介:熊飞,男,1991年生,博士,讲师,主要从事岩体力学和地下工程等方面的教学与科研工作。E-mail: xiongfeiss@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省自然科学基础研究计划(No. 2025JC-YBQN-742);国家重点研发计划(No. 2018YFC1504802)

Mechanism of mining-induced failure and instability of steep karst slope with deep and large fissures

XIONG Fei1, 2, LIU Xin-rong2, 3, LIU Wen-wu2, ZHONG Zu-liang2, 3, YANG Zhong-ping2, 3, WANG Nan-yun2, WANG Hao2, XUE Yi1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710048, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
  • Received:2024-11-22 Accepted:2025-02-05 Online:2025-08-11 Published:2025-08-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi (2025JC-YBQN-742) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFC1504802).

摘要: 为研究含深大裂隙陡崖式岩溶山体采动破坏和失稳机制,首先梳理了近50年以来我国西南地区典型含深大裂隙岩溶山体崩滑案例,分析了崩滑基本特征。再以猴场镇幺岩脚崩塌为背景,在现场调查的基础上,结合相似模型试验和理论分析,全面研究了地下开采对含深大裂隙陡崖式岩溶山体变形破坏的影响,探讨了深大裂隙对采动坡体的控制作用,阐明了坡体崩塌失稳机制,获得了坡体崩塌前后稳定性变化。最后,对不同地质条件下含深大裂隙陡崖式岩溶山体采动破坏和失稳模式进行讨论,揭示了不同崩滑模式的形成机制。结果表明:坡体的变形和破坏随开采进行而不断调整,深大裂隙后方坡体由开始的沉降和向外变形最终转变为“悬臂塌落”式破坏;危岩体随着开采进行先后倾变形后向前倾倒。深大裂隙具有分割采动坡体变形的作用,这种作用与开采进程有关。地下开采对含深大裂隙陡崖式岩溶坡体的变形破坏起到了决定性作用,不同山体对地下开采的力学响应具有一定的相似性,但不同的工程地质条件下,坡体最终的崩滑失稳模式和机制具有显著的差别。

关键词: 陡崖式岩溶山体, 深大裂隙, 地下开采, 变形破坏, 失稳模式

Abstract: To investigate the mechanisms of failure and instability in steep karst slopes with deep and large fissures due to mining activities, a comprehensive review of typical rock collapse and landslide cases in karst mountains with such fissures in southwestern China over the past 50 years was first conducted, and the basic characteristics of these collapses and landslides were analyzed. Subsequently, taking the collapse at Yaoyanjiao in Houchang Town as a case study and based on extensive field investigations, a thorough examination was carried out using similar physical model tests and theoretical analysis to explore the impact of underground mining on the deformation and failure of the steep karst slope with deep and large fissures. The controlling effect of these fissures on the mining-induced slope was discussed. The mechanism of slope collapse and instability was elucidated, and the stability variation of slope before and after collapse were obtained. Finally, the failure and instability modes of steep karst slopes with deep and large fissures under various geological conditions due to mining activities were discussed, revealing the formation mechanisms of different collapse and landslide modes. The results indicate that the deformation and failure of the slope adjust continuously with the progression of mining. Initially, the slope behind the deep and large fissure experiences settlement and outward deformation, ultimately transitioning into a failure mode of “cantilever collapse”. The dangerous rock mass undergoes initial backward inclination deformation followed by forward toppling as mining progresses. The deep and large fissures exert a segmentation effect on the deformation of the mining-disturbed slope, which is correlated with the mining process. Underground mining exerts a decisive influence on the deformation and failure of steep karst slopes with deep and large fissures. Although there are certain similarities in the mechanical responses of different mountains to underground mining, the modes and mechanisms of ultimate collapse of the slopes exhibit significant differences under varying engineering geological conditions.

Key words: steep karst mountain, deep and large fissure, underground mining, deformation failure, instability mode

中图分类号: TU 457
[1] 张昕晔, 刘志伟, 翁效林, 李铉聪, 赵建崇, 刘小光. 上砂下黏复合地层隧道开挖面稳定性及破坏模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3637-3648.
[2] 张振波, 李秉欣, 杨茜, 刘志春, 刘义, . 近接基坑工程有限土体失稳模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 266-277.
[3] 孔洋, 阮怀宁, 汪璋淳, . 模拟柱状节理玄武岩试样的失效模式与各向异性特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 259-266.
[4] 殷山, 宋大钊, 王恩元, 何学秋, 李忠辉, 刘晓斐, 刘玉冰, . 受载砂岩变形破坏过程磁场响应规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1803-1812.
[5] 江权, 刘强, . 地下洞室变形破坏物理模拟的力学相似畸变映射原理与实例分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 20-37.
[6] 张院生, 雷云超, 强小俊, 吴东东, 王东坡, 王计华, . 多排微型桩框架结构加固边坡离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1983-1994.
[7] 王田龙, 陈从新, 夏开宗, 邵勇, 刘轩廷, 杨括宇, 周意超, . 陡倾结构金属矿山采空区围岩破坏机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1487-1500.
[8] 周翔, 蔡静森, 马伟成, 肖皓文, . 物质组成特征对碎石土斜坡变形破坏影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 531-540.
[9] 刘学生, 范德源, 谭云亮, 王新, ALEXEY Agafangelovich, . 深部动载作用下超大断面硐室群锚固围岩破坏失稳机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(12): 3407-3418.
[10] 侯公羽, 荆浩勇, 梁金平, 谭金鑫, 张永康, 杨希, 谢鑫, . 不同荷载下矩形巷道围岩变形及声发射 特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1818-1828.
[11] 张传庆, 刘振江, 张春生, 周辉, 高阳, 侯靖, . 隐晶质玄武岩破裂演化及破坏特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2487-2496.
[12] 邓洋洋, 陈从新, 夏开宗, 郑先伟, . 程潮铁矿西区地表塌陷成因分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 743-758.
[13] 向 高,刘建锋,李天一,徐杨梦迪,邓朝福,吴 池,. 基于声发射的盐岩变形破坏过程的分形与损伤特征研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2905-2912.
[14] 黄俊杰,王 薇,苏 谦,李 婷,王 迅,. 素混凝土桩复合地基支承路堤变形破坏模式[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1653-1661.
[15] 李 韬,徐奴文,戴 峰,李天斌,樊义林,李 彪,. 白鹤滩水电站左岸坝肩开挖边坡稳定性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 665-674.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!