岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (S1): 309-321.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0641CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.0641

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

软土小曲率盾构隧道开挖诱发黏弹性地层沉降的解析解

张治国1, 2, 3, 4,陈胤吉1,朱正国2,魏纲3,孙苗苗3, 4   

  1. 1. 上海理工大学 环境与建筑学院,上海 200093;2. 石家庄铁道大学 省部共建交通工程结构力学行为与系统安全国家重点实验室,河北 石家庄 050043;3. 浙大城市学院 土木工程系,浙江 杭州 310015;4. 浙大城市学院 城市基础设施智能化浙江省工程研究中心,浙江 杭州 310015
  • 收稿日期:2024-05-27 接受日期:2024-09-26 出版日期:2025-08-08 发布日期:2025-08-28
  • 作者简介:张治国,男,1978年生,博士,博士后,教授,主要从事地下工程等方面的研究工作。E-mail: zgzhang@usst.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.52478402,No.42177145);省部共建交通工程结构力学行为与系统安全国家重点实验室课题(No.KF2022-07);城市基础设施智能化浙江省工程研究中心课题(No.IUI2022-YB-01)。

Analytical solution for settlement of viscoelastic ground induced by small curvature shield tunnel excavation in soft soil

ZHANG Zhi-guo1, 2, 3, 4, CHEN Yin-ji1, ZHU Zheng-guo2, WEI Gang3, SUN Miao-miao3, 4   

  1. 1. School of Environment and Architecture, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior and System Safety of Traffic Engineering Structures, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050043, China; 3. Department of Civil Engineering, Hangzhou City University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310015, China; 4. Zhejiang Engineering Research Center of Intelligent Urban Infrastructure, Hangzhou City University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310015, China
  • Received:2024-05-27 Accepted:2024-09-26 Online:2025-08-08 Published:2025-08-28
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52478402, 42177145), the Opening Fund of State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior and System Safety of Traffic Engineering Structures (KF2022-07) and the Opening Fund of Zhejiang Engineering Research Center of Intelligent Urban Infrastructure (IUI2022-YB-01).

摘要: 目前针对小曲率盾构开挖诱发地层沉降的理论研究一般将地基视为线弹性体,未考虑土体流变特性的影响,因此无法准确预测时间效应下盾构沿曲线路径开挖的沉降变化。首先,建立Boltzmann黏弹性地基中的小曲率隧道掘进力学模型,将线弹性地层参数泊松比、剪切模量进行Laplace变换,得到了黏弹性地层的时域参数;其次,将地层损失解及Mindlin位移解进行Laplace正逆变换,推导出黏弹性地层小曲率盾构施工中,因超挖地层损失、盾构尾部地层损失、刀盘面不平衡推力、盾壳不平衡摩擦力及盾尾注浆压力共同影响的沉降解;最后,将工程实测数据及三维数值模拟结果与解析解进行对比验证,得到了较好的一致性。此外,针对隧道曲率半径、盾构刀盘面半径及黏弹性地层剪切模量比等进行参数分析。分析结果表明:小曲率隧道内外侧横向地表沉降呈不对称分布,沉降峰值向内侧偏移,随时间增长,沉降槽曲线向下移动,沉降量增大;相较于较大的隧道曲率半径,较小的曲率半径发生等量变化时对地层沉降的影响更显著;隧道曲率半径及黏弹性地层剪切模量比的减小,刀盘面半径及超挖量的增大,使得盾构尾部处横向地表沉降增大,也使得刀盘面前方和后方地表的隆起与沉降均增大。

关键词: 黏弹性地层, 小曲率隧道, 超挖量, 地层沉降, Laplace变换

Abstract: Current theoretical studies on ground settlement induced by small curvature shield excavation generally consider the foundation as linear elastic bodies, neglecting the rheological behavior of soil. Therefore, the time-dependent settlement changes of shield excavation along curved path cannot be accurately predicted. A mechanical model for small curvature tunneling in a Boltzmann viscoelastic foundation was established. Time domain parameters of the viscoelastic ground were obtained through Laplace transforms of the Poisson’s ratio and shear modulus for the linear elastic ground parameters. Then, the solutions for ground loss and Mindlin displacement were converted by positive and inverse Laplace transforms. During small curvature shield construction in the viscoelastic ground, a settlement solution was derived that accounts for the combined effects of over-excavated ground loss, shield tail ground loss, cutterhead face thrust imbalance, shield shell friction imbalance and slurry pressure at the shield tail. Finally, field measurements and three-dimensional numerical simulation results are compared with the analytical solution to verify its relative accuracy. In addition, the parameters of tunnel curvature radius, shield cutterhead face radius and viscoelastic ground shear modulus ratio are analyzed. The analysis results show that the transverse surface settlement inside and outside the small curvature tunnel is asymmetrically distributed, with the peak settlement shifting inward. The settlement trough curve shifts downward and the settlement volume increases with time. A smaller tunnel curvature radius has a more significant effect on ground settlement compared to a larger tunnel radius curvature with equal changes. Reduction in tunnel curvature radius and viscoelastic ground shear modulus ratio, along with growth in cutterhead face radius and over-excavated value, result in the increase in transverse surface settlement at the shield tail, as well as the increase in uplift and settlement of the longitudinal surface both before and behind the cutterhead face.

Key words: viscoelastic ground, small curvature tunnel, over-excavated value, ground settlement, Laplace transform

中图分类号: U45
[1] 王立安, 余云燕, 任新, 陈辉, . 循环荷载作用下分数阶饱和黏土地基的动力固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2279-2289.
[2] 冉龙洲, 袁松, 王希宝, 王峥峥, 张生, . 明棚洞落石冲击荷载计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1748-1760.
[3] 张玉, 梁昊, 林亮, 周游, 赵青松, . 不同沉降方式下埋地管道力学响应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1645-1656.
[4] 张治国, 陈杰, 朱正国, 魏纲, 吴钟腾, 陈仲侃, . 考虑盾构铰接作用的小半径曲线隧道开挖诱发地层沉降分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1165-1178.
[5] 王滢, 王海萍, 高盟, . 非饱和土中圆柱形衬砌隧道的瞬态动力响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(11): 3185-3197.
[6] 赵留园, 单治钢, 汪明元, . 地震作用下南黄海海上风电场水 平场地液化特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 169-180.
[7] 孙德安, 薛垚, 汪磊, . 变荷载作用下考虑半透水边界热传导性的 一维饱和土热固结特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1465-1473.
[8] 熊 辉,江雅丰,禹荣霞. 层状地基中基于Laplace变换的桩基横向振动阻抗计算[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1901-1907.
[9] 刘忠玉,杨 强. 基于分数阶Kelvin模型的饱和黏土一维流变固结分析[J]. , 2017, 38(12): 3680-3687.
[10] 王 滢 ,高广运,. 饱和半空间瞬态加载衬砌隧道的动力响应研究[J]. , 2016, 37(3): 850-858.
[11] 杨 骁,周 磊,张 敏. 爆炸荷载作用下深埋圆形隧洞的饱和黏弹性土-衬砌系统动力响应[J]. , 2015, 36(7): 2013-2020.
[12] 赵智涛 ,刘 军 ,王 霆 ,刘继尧,. 地铁暗挖施工引起的管线与地层沉降关系研究[J]. , 2015, 36(4): 1159-1166.
[13] 夏元友 ,陈春舒 ,BAKRI Mudthir ,王智德 ,周 雄,. 浅埋隧道开挖引起的土体水平位移分析[J]. , 2015, 36(2): 354-360.
[14] 徐 平 ,李小春 ,周新民,. 瓦斯抽采过程中孔壁的动态响应分析[J]. , 2015, 36(1): 123-130.
[15] 安建永 ,项彦勇 ,贾永州,. 既有桩基荷载对邻近浅埋隧道开挖效应及支护内力影响的研究[J]. , 2014, 35(4): 926-932.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!