岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (S1): 377-388.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.1298CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.1298

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于刃脚土压力的超大锚碇沉井基础下沉智能预测

蔡启航1, 2,董学超2, 3,郭明伟2, 3,卢正2, 3,徐安4,蒋凡4   

  1. 1. 华北水利水电大学 地球科学与工程学院,河南 郑州 450046;2. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程安全全国重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;3. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049;4. 中铁桥隧技术有限公司,江苏 南京 210061
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-22 接受日期:2025-01-24 出版日期:2025-08-08 发布日期:2025-08-28
  • 通讯作者: 郭明伟,男,1981年生,博士,副研究员,硕士生导师,主要从事岩土稳定性分析方面的研究工作。E-mail: mwguo@whrsm.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:蔡启航,男,2000年生,硕士研究生,主要从事计算岩土力学方面的研究工作。E-mail: z202210020234@stu.ncwu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No.42077262)。

Intelligent prediction of sinking of super-large anchorage caisson foundation based on soil pressure at cutting edges

CAI Qi-hang1, 2, DONG Xue-chao2, 3, GUO Ming-wei2, 3, LU Zheng2, 3, XU An4, JIANG Fan4   

  1. 1. School of Earth Science and Engineering, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, Henan 450046, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering safty, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 4. China Railway Bridge and Tunnel Technology Co. Ltd., Nanjing, Jiangsu 210061, China
  • Received:2024-10-22 Accepted:2025-01-24 Online:2025-08-08 Published:2025-08-28
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (42077262).

摘要: 沉井基础因整体刚度大,承载能力强已广泛应用于大型桥梁工程,其下沉施工的关键在于控制下沉状态的安全平稳,准确预测取土施工过程中沉井基础的下沉速率与倾斜程度对下沉控制至关重要。沉井基础在下沉过程中获取了大量的刃脚土压力实时监测数据,刃脚土压力实测数据的数据维度较高,与沉井下沉速率和倾斜程度的作用机制复杂,采用传统方法难以处理,故采用机器学习中的极限树算法建立下沉状态预测模型,模型可提取刃脚土压力监测数据的时间和空间特征,捕捉刃脚土压力与沉井基础下沉速率和倾斜程度之间的复杂关系,智能化预测沉井的下沉速率和倾斜程度,并将预测模型应用于张靖皋长江大桥北锚碇沉井基础工程中,计算模型评估参数、验证模型预测精度。另外,将所选取的极限树算法与其他常用机器学习算法进行对比,并分析模型参数对所提出模型预测精度的影响规律。结果表明:所建立的分析模型预测精度高,工程应用时决定系数R2均大于0.9,可以满足工程需要,且极限树算法预测效果优于其他机器学习方法,基决策树个数的增加与最大树深度的增大有助于提高模型的预测精度。研究结果可为类似沉井工程控制下沉速率及倾斜程度提供参考。

关键词: 沉井基础, 下沉速率预测, 倾斜程度预测, 刃脚土压力, 机器学习, 极限树, 张靖皋长江大桥

Abstract: The caisson foundation is widely used in large bridge projects due to its high overall stiffness and strong bearing capacity. The key to successful sinking construction is to maintain a safe and stable sinking process. Accurately predicting the sinking rate and tilt degree of the caisson foundation during soil excavation is crucial for effective sinking control. During the sinking process, extensive real-time monitoring data of soil pressure at the cutting edge are collected. These data exhibit high dimensionality, and the underlying mechanisms linking soil pressure to sinking rate and tilt degree are complex, posing challenges for traditional analytical methods. Therefore, the extra trees algorithm from machine learning is employed to establish a sinking state prediction model. This model extracts temporal and spatial features from the monitoring data, captures the complex relationships between cutting edge soil pressure and sinking behavior, and enables intelligent prediction of sinking rate and tilt degree. The model was applied to the northern anchor caisson project of the Zhangjinggao Yangtze River Bridge, with model evaluation parameters calculated to verify prediction accuracy. Additionally, the extra trees algorithm was compared with other common machine learning methods, and the influence of model parameters on prediction accuracy was analyzed. Results show that the established model achieves high prediction accuracy, with R2 values consistently greater than 0.9 in engineering applications, meeting project requirements. The extra trees algorithm outperforms other machine learning methods, and prediction accuracy improves with an increased number of individual decision trees and greater maximum tree depth. These findings provide valuable reference for controlling sinking rates and tilt degrees in similar caisson foundation projects.

Key words: caisson foundation, sinking rate prediction, tilt degree prediction, soil pressure under cutting edges, machine learning, extra tree, Zhang-Jing-Gao Yangtze River Bridge

中图分类号: U446.2
[1] 江晓童, 张西文, 吕颖慧, 李仁杰, 江浩, . 机器学习在岩土工程中的应用现状与未来展望[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 419-436.
[2] 真嘉捷, 赖丰文, 黄明, 廖清香, 李爽, 段岳强. 基于时序聚类和在线学习的盾构掘进地层智能识别方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3615-3625.
[3] 贺隆平, 姚囝, 王其虎, 叶义成, 凌济锁, . 基于自动机器学习的岩爆烈度分级预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2839-2848.
[4] 龙潇, 孙锐, 郑桐, . 基于卷积神经网络的液化预测模型及可解释性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2741-2753.
[5] 杨洋, 魏怡童. 基于分类树的液化概率等级评估新方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2175-2186.
[6] 邓志兴, 谢康, 李泰灃, 王武斌, 郝哲睿, 李佳珅, . 基于粗颗粒嵌锁点高铁级配碎石振动压实质量控制新方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1835-1849.
[7] 潘秋景, 吴洪涛, 张子龙, 宋克志, . 基于多域物理信息神经网络的复合地层隧道掘进地表沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 539-551.
[8] 蒋明镜, 张卢丰, 韩亮, 姜朋明, . 基于符号回归算法的结构性砂土损伤规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3768-3778.
[9] 吴爽爽, 胡新丽, 孙少锐, 魏继红, . 间歇式滑坡变形力学机制与单体预警案例研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 593-602.
[10] 董学超, 郭明伟, 王水林, . 基于LightGBM的超大沉井下沉状态预测及传感器优化布置[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1789-1799.
[11] 蒋凡, 刘华, 岳青, 杨文爽. 超大沉井基础取土下沉刃脚土压力变化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 431-442.
[12] 仉文岗, 顾鑫, 刘汉龙, 张青, 王林, 王鲁琦, . 基于贝叶斯更新的非饱和土坡参数概率 反演及变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 1112-1122.
[13] 蒋炳楠, 马建林, 褚晶磊, 李孟豪, 李军堂, 徐 力, . 水中超深大沉井施工期间侧压力现场监测研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1551-1560.
[14] 谭国宏, 肖海珠, 杜 勋, 胡文军. 大跨度公铁合建斜拉桥主塔沉井基础沉降变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1113-1120.
[15] 苏国韶,张克实,吕海波. 位移反分析的粒子群优化-高斯过程协同优化方法[J]. , 2011, 32(2): 510-515.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!