岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (9): 2721-2737.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.1353CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.1353

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解

江文豪1,王浩1,廖光志2,陈滨华2   

  1. 1. 福州大学 紫金地质与矿业学院,福建 福州 350108;2. 福建岩土工程勘察研究院有限公司,福建 福州 350108
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-31 接受日期:2025-01-06 出版日期:2025-09-10 发布日期:2025-09-04
  • 通讯作者: 王浩,男,1978年生,博士,教授,主要从事地质灾害防治、环境岩土工程等方面的研究。E-mail: h_wang@126.com
  • 作者简介:江文豪,男,1996年生,博士,副教授,主要从事边坡工程、环境岩土工程方面的研究。E-mail: Geo_Jiang2020@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    福州大学科研启动基金项目(No.511503);国家自然科学基金面上项目(No.42477165)。

Analytical solutions for one-dimensional transient seepage of water in the two-layered unsaturated soils under time-varying rainfall conditions

JIANG Wen-hao1, WANG hao1, LIAO Guang-zhi2, CHEN Bin-hua2   

  1. 1. Zijin School of Geology and Mining, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350108, China; 2. Fujian Geotechnical Engineering Investigation Institute Co., Ltd., Fuzhou, Fujian 350108, China
  • Received:2024-10-31 Accepted:2025-01-06 Online:2025-09-10 Published:2025-09-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Project of Research Initiation Fund of Fuzhou University (511503) and the General Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China (42477165).

摘要: 在自然环境和工程实践中,广泛存在多层非饱和土中水的渗流现象。为准确描述时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流行为,基于指数型的土−水特征曲线及渗透系数函数,首先,利用变量代换、分离变量和Fourier级数变换法推导得到了相应解析解,该解析解还考虑了任意初始含水率分布和两类底部边界;在此基础上,通过与现有两个解析解和相应数值解比较,充分验证了所提解析解正确性;最后,以简化双层土质盖层为例,分析了水分在双层非饱和土中一维瞬态渗流规律。结果表明:在总降雨量相同情况下,“前峰型”降雨模式下盖层中的储水量较小,累计渗漏量CQb较大,“后峰型”降雨模式则与之相反;相比于饱和渗透系数较小的土质盖层位于双层盖层上方的情况,其位于下方时对应的储水量较大,CQb值较小;当初始总储水量相同时,底部体积含水率越大,降雨一段时间后盖层中的储水量越小,CQb值越大;盖层的初始有效饱和度Sini越大,降雨过程中CQb值也越大,且在同一时刻,CQb值随Sini增大呈线性增大趋势。

关键词: 双层非饱和土, 瞬态渗流, 时变降雨, 解析解, 初始含水率分布, 底部边界类型

Abstract: The seepage phenomenon of water in multi-layered unsaturated soils is ubiquitous in natural environments and engineering practices. To accurately describe the one-dimensional transient seepage behavior of water in the two-layered unsaturated soil under a time-varying rainfall scenario, based on the exponential soil-water characteristic curve and permeability coefficient function, the corresponding analytical solutions are derived for the first time via the approach of variable substitution, separation variable, and Fourier series transformation. The solutions also account for the arbitrary initial water content distribution and two types of bottom boundary. On this basis, the correctness of the proposed analytical solutions is validated by comparing them with existing two analytical solutions and corresponding numerical solutions. Finally, taking the simplified two-layered soil cover as an example, the one-dimensional transient seepage laws of water in the two-layered unsaturated soil are analyzed. The results indicate that, for the same total rainfall, water storage in the cover is smaller and cumulative leakage CQb is larger under the “previous-peak” rainfall pattern, while the opposite occur under the “post-peak” pattern. Compared to the case where the soil cover with a smaller saturated permeability coefficient is located above the two-layered cover, the corresponding water storage is larger and the value CQb is smaller when it is located below. When the initial total water storage is the same, the larger volumetric water content at the bottom zone, the smaller water storage in the cover after a period of rainfall, and the larger value of CQb. A larger initial effective saturation of the cover Sini leads to a larger value of CQb during the rainfall, and at the same time, the value of CQb increases linearly with an increasing Sini.

Key words: two-layered unsaturated soil, transient seepage, time-varying rainfall, analytical solution, initial water content distribution, bottom boundary type

中图分类号: TV139.1
[1] 周航, 汪义圣, 亓戈平, . 黏弹性土中异形桩横向动力响应半解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 761-774.
[2] 王浩, 侯泓冰, 江文豪, . 考虑根系对水文特性影响下非饱和植被土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3329-3345.
[3] 张智卿, 刘鑫, 刘开富, 吴君涛, 吴文兵, . 横观各向同性土体中端承桩水平振动特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3371-3382.
[4] 江学辉, 颜建伟, 罗文俊, 李佳宝, 徐长节. 纵向压力和加固钢板对隧道力学性能影响的解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1623-1632.
[5] 王亦炀, 李传勋, 李阔, 陆向综. 竖井地基大应变非线性固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1446-1456.
[6] 刘景锦, 罗学思, 雷华阳, 郑刚, 罗昊鹏, . 等应变条件下增压式真空预压固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 809-821.
[7] 高柳, 吕述晖, 王奎华, . 缺陷桩-梁系统的动力特性应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 3095-3104.
[8] 张玉国, 杨文兵, 赵雅纯, 王闯, 赵亚敏. 双向渗流下考虑应力时空效应的组合桩复合地基固结理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 184-196.
[9] 余俊, 李东凯, 和振, 张志中. 带有两端防渗墙坝基的各向异性渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2381-2388.
[10] 黄娟, 和振, 余俊, 杨鑫歆. 渗透各向异性圆形围堰稳态渗流场解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1035-1043.
[11] 郑长杰, 崔亦秦, 吴琛, 罗通, 栾鲁宝, . 竖向入射S波作用下单桩水平地震响应简化解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 327-336.
[12] 余俊, 张志中, 郑靖凡, 和振. 水位波动条件下有封底基坑渗流场孔压解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3415-3423.
[13] 余俊, 张扬, 郑靖凡, 张志中. 考虑潜水面的基坑二维稳态渗流场解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(11): 3109-3116.
[14] 李炯, 李明广, 詹红兵, 陈锦剑, 夏小和, 张硕. 井周堵塞对承压含水层定流量回灌渗流场影响的半解析研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 2871-2878.
[15] 朱赛男, 陈艳华, 王宁, 李伟华, 张为为. 平面P1波入射下海底隧道与海床土交界面 滑移接触效应解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 3049-3058.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!