岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (10): 3197-3207.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.1538CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.1538

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于非饱和剪切体变特征的马兰黄土液化评价方法

慕焕东1, 2, 3,邓亚虹1, 2,赵勋昌4,何乃楠1, 2,郑龙浩3,何也3   

  1. 1.长安大学 地质工程与测绘学院,陕西 西安 710054;2.长安大学 西部矿产资源与地质工程教育部重点实验室,陕西 西安 710054; 3.西安理工大学 岩土工程研究所,陕西 西安 710048;4.甘肃省地质矿产勘查开发局第二地质矿产勘查院,甘肃 兰州 730020
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-13 接受日期:2025-05-15 出版日期:2025-10-11 发布日期:2025-10-13
  • 作者简介:慕焕东,男,1989年生,硕士,高级实验师,硕士生导师,主要从事岩土工程减灾防灾方面的研究工作。E-mail: mhdyhx@xaut.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.42372336);长安大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(No.300102262505)。

Liquefaction evaluation method of Malan loess based on variation characteristics of unsaturated shear volume

MU Huan-dong1, 2, 3, DENG Ya-hong1, 2, ZHAO Xun-chang4, HE Nai-nan1, 2, ZHENG Long-hao3, HE Ye3   

  1. 1. School of Geology Engineering and Geomatics, Chang’an University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710054, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Western China’s Mineral Resources and Geological Engineering of Ministry of Education, Chang’an University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710054, China; 3. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710048, China; 4. The Second Geological and Mineral Exploration Institute of Gansu Provincial Bureau of Geology and Mineral Exploration and Development, Lanzhou, Gansu 730020, China
  • Received:2024-12-13 Accepted:2025-05-15 Online:2025-10-11 Published:2025-10-13
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42372336) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, CHD (300102262505).

摘要: 为探究黄土体积的变化特征与其孔压和液化之间的关系,选取古浪马兰黄土为研究对象,通过非饱和固结排水试验对不同含水率和围压下黄土的剪切体变特征进行研究,并通过饱和固结不排水试验对黄土的应力路径和孔压特性进行研究,在此基础上分析不同含水率下临界状态线的分布规律,进而建立饱和状态下的临界状态线,并与饱和固结不排水试验得到的临界状态线进行对比验证,据此建立黄土体变与孔压之间的联系,提出一种基于非饱和剪切体变的液化评价方法。研究表明:非饱和马兰黄土的应力-应变曲线总体呈现出应变硬化型,剪切体变为剪缩型;饱和马兰黄土的应力-应变曲线呈应变软化型,偏应力随平均有效应力的增加先增加至峰值,后逐渐减小并趋于稳定;非饱和状态下各临界状态线近似平行,随着含水率的增大临界状态线的分布越靠下,含水率对临界状态线的斜率影响较小而对截距影响较大;土体初始状态点到饱和临界状态线的距离即为孔压的变化量,基于饱和临界状态线计算的孔压判别古浪马兰黄土只是存在液化可能。研究成果是黄土液化评价方面有价值的探索。

关键词: 马兰黄土, 剪切体变特征, 液化临界状态线, 液化评价, 应力路径, 孔压测试

Abstract: To explore the relationship between the volume change characteristics of loess, pore pressure and liquefaction, Gulang Malan loess was selected as the research subject. Unsaturated consolidated undrained tests were conducted to study the shear volume characteristics of loess under different water contents and confining pressures. Saturated consolidated undrained tests were also conducted to examine the stress paths and pore pressure characteristics of loess. Based on these studies, the distribution pattern of the critical state lines under different water contents was analyzed. Critical state lines in saturated conditions were established and compared with those from saturated consolidated undrained tests for validation. This provided a basis for establishing a connection between the loess volume change and pore pressure, leading to the proposal of a liquefaction evaluation method based on unsaturated shear volume. The findings indicate that the stress-strain curves of unsaturated Malan loess generally exhibit strain hardening behavior, with shear deformation being contractive. Conversely, stress-strain curves of saturated Malan loess display strain softening behavior. The deviatoric stress initially increases to a peak value with increasing mean effective stress and then gradually decreases and stabilizes. Critical state lines under unsaturated conditions are approximately parallel. As water content increases, the distribution of the critical state lines shifts downward. Water content has a relatively minor effect on the slope of the critical state line but a significant impact on the intercept. The distance from the initial state of the soil to the saturated critical state line represents the change in pore pressure. The pore pressure calculated based on the saturated critical state line indicates that there is only a possibility of liquefaction in Gulang Malan loess. This research provides valuable exploration in the field of loess liquefaction evaluation.

Key words: Malan loess, shear volume characteristics, liquefaction critical state line, liquefaction evaluation, stress path, pore pressure testing

中图分类号: TU 444
[1] 曹祎, 荣传新, 王衍森, 常磊, 王彬, . 冻结钙质黏土复杂应力路径下的力学响应及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2071-2084.
[2] FARHAD Jamil, 曾长女, 马媛, SHARAFAT Ali. 初始固结角度对饱和粉质土应变发展的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 527-538.
[3] 秦悠, 龙慧, 吴琪, 庄海洋, 陈国兴. 复杂应力路径下饱和珊瑚砂孔压增长与刚度退化的阈值应变试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3441-3450.
[4] 郑可跃, 施成华, 娄义黎, 贾朝军, 雷明锋, 杨益, . 深部高地应力隧道开挖卸荷围岩能量计算方法及演化机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 165-177.
[5] 王贵宾, 刘桓兑, 唐明豪, 杨春和, 陈世万, . 复杂应力路径下的花岗岩洞室开挖损伤区研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2539-2553.
[6] 李永强, 许言, 陈波, 熊健辉, 卢玢宇, . 反压诱导有效应力增生模式与土体强度关联机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2338-2350.
[7] 陈军浩, 张艳娥, 王刚, 王恒, . 不同固结路径下钙质砂固结排水强度性状研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2290-2298.
[8] 孙杰豪, 郭保华, 程胜锦, 田世轩, 陈岩, . 不同控制方式和卸荷应力路径下类岩石节理剪切强度特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2061-2071.
[9] 薛秀丽, 刘治珩, 曾超峰, 白 宁, 陈宏波. 开挖前抽水条件下基坑围挡两侧非极限土压力计算模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1699-1708.
[10] 范浩, 王磊, 王连国, . 不同应力路径下层理煤体力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 385-395.
[11] 李林, 左林龙, 胡涛涛, 宋博恺, . 基于孔压静力触探试验测试数据的原位固结系数物理信息神经网络反演方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 2889-2899.
[12] 李尧, 李嘉评. 复杂初始应力状态下松砂多向循环单剪特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2555-2565.
[13] 张季如, 郑颜军, 彭伟珂, 王磊, 陈敬鑫. 填土应力路径下珊瑚砂幂律应力-应变模型的适用性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1309-1318.
[14] 舒荣军, 孔令伟, 周振华, 简涛, 李甜果, . 卸荷-增孔压条件下花岗岩残积土的力学特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 473-482.
[15] 钟丽, 陈鑫莲, 刘晓璇, 罗明星, 王兴肖. 不同应力路径下钙质砂的力学及变形特性 试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 2929-2941.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!