岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (10): 3315-3328.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.00571CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.00571

• 测试技术 • 上一篇    

利用时空变化的孔隙水压力测量数据识别固结模型参数

詹润涛1, 2,尹晓萌1, 3   

  1. 1.信阳师范大学 建筑与土木工程学院,河南 信阳 464000;2.信阳师范大学 河南省非饱和土与特殊土工程技术研究中心,河南 信阳 464000; 3.湖北文理学院 土木工程与建筑学院,湖北 武汉 441053
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-10 接受日期:2025-06-09 出版日期:2025-10-11 发布日期:2025-10-14
  • 作者简介:詹润涛,男,1977年生,博士,讲师,主要从事岩土工程反问题和土-结构相互作用研究。E-mail: zrt@xynu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 41807240);湖北省自然科学基金(No. 2023AFB607)。

Identification of consolidation model parameters using spatiotemporally varying pore water pressure measurements

ZHAN Run-tao1, 2, YIN Xiao-meng 1, 3   

  1. 1. College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang, Henan 464000, China; 2. Henan Unsaturated Soil and Special Soil Engineering Technology Research Center, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang, Henan 464000, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Hubei University of Arts and Science, Wuhan, Hubei 441053, China
  • Received:2024-10-10 Accepted:2025-06-09 Online:2025-10-11 Published:2025-10-14
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41807240) and the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (2023AFB607).

摘要: 应用最小二乘法并结合一系列随时间和空间变化的孔隙水压力测量值,识别了固结模型的岩土参数。首先,建立了包含时间和空间坐标的孔隙水压力最小二乘函数。接着,构建了一个同时考虑时间和空间的新雅可比矩阵,该矩阵允许进行任意数量的时间和空间测量。通过泰勒级数展开,推导出了Gauss-Newton法、Levenberg法、Marquardt法和Nielsen法的迭代方程。通过两个数值算例验证了所提出的方法。在算例1中,识别了太沙基模型的固结系数。对比研究表明,4种方法均能收敛到正确解,但Marquardt法收敛速度较慢。在算例2中,识别了二维流体饱和介质中孔隙弹性固结模型点源的坐标,其中Gauss-Newton法未能准确定位点源,而Nielsen法虽然加速了收敛,但引入了多个阻尼系数区间和收敛值。Marquardt法在点源识别方面更为有效。此外,研究还强调了传感器布置和初始迭代坐标对于准确识别点源的重要性。两个算例均表明,所提出的方法具有一定的抗噪声能力。

关键词: 固结, 最小二乘问题, Gauss-Newton法, Levenberg-Marquardt法, 传感器布置

Abstract: The study applies the least squares technique in conjunction with a series of spatiotemporally varying pore water pressure measurements to identify the geotechnical parameters of consolidation models. Firstly, a least squares function for pore water pressure, incorporating both temporal and spatial coordinates, is developed. Subsequently, a new Jacobian matrix is constructed to accommodate any number of temporal and spatial measurements. Using Taylor series expansion, the iterative equations for the Gauss-Newton, Levenberg, Marquardt, and Nielsen methods are derived. The proposed methods are validated using two numerical examples. In Case 1, the consolidation coefficient of Terzaghi’s model is identified. Comparative analysis reveals that all four methods converge to the correct solution, although the Marquardt method converges more slowly. In Case 2, the coordinates of a point source in a two-dimensional fluid-saturated medium are identified using a poroelastic consolidation model. The Gauss-Newton method fails to accurately locate the point source, whereas the Nielsen method accelerates convergence but introduces multiple damping coefficient intervals and convergence values. The Marquardt method is more effective for point source identification. Additionally, the study highlights the importance of sensor placement and initial iteration coordinates for accurate point source identification. Both cases show that the proposed methods possess some noise resistance.

Key words: consolidation, least square problem, Gauss-Newton method, Levenberg-Marquardt method, sensor layout

中图分类号: TU 431
[1] 鲍树峰, 董志良, 莫海鸿, 张劲文, 于立婷, 刘攀, 刘晓强, 侯明勋, . 浮泥−流泥静态间歇沉降与低压固结沉降计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2763-2772.
[2] 杨爱武, 程姝晓, 梁振振, 华谦谦, 杨少朋. 高含水率吹填土大变形固结与流变叠加效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1977-1987.
[3] 倪睿思, 肖世国, 吴兵, 梁瑶, . 基于非线性井阻的饱和软弱土无砂增压式真空预压分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2160-2172.
[4] 周波翰, 张文利, 王栋. 球形贯入仪预测超固结土强度的数值研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1303-1309.
[5] 金磊, 李晶晶, 李新明, 孙翰卿, . 柔性边界的有限差分法−离散元法模拟及其对砂土三轴固结排水和不排水剪切特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 980-990.
[6] 徐斌, 陈柯好, 庞锐, . 超固结黏土的剪胀方程及边界面模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 449-456.
[7] FARHAD Jamil, 曾长女, 马媛, SHARAFAT Ali. 初始固结角度对饱和粉质土应变发展的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 527-538.
[8] 孙宏磊, 徐振恺, 刘斯杰, 蔡袁强, . 考虑土柱发展过程的淤泥真空预压大应变固结计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 133-146.
[9] 许宝龙, 卢萌盟, 刘元杰, 张鑫岩. 多元排水体复合地基固结解析模型和解答[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 73-83.
[10] 刘吉福. 排水固结堤坝稳定分析新方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 106-114.
[11] 郭晓刚, 马垒, 张超, 淦树成, 王华, 甘一雄, 周通, . 软弱基底排土场边坡逆排堆高速率及稳定性控制方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 596-606.
[12] 高旭, 宋琨, 李凌, 晏鄂川, 王卫明, . 基于迭代协同克里金反演的非均质地基固结沉降预测研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 761-770.
[13] 石修松, 周高涨, 刘磊磊, . 基于非线性Hvorslev面的超固结土层隧道掌子面稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2595-2610.
[14] TIEP Pham Duc, TU Nguyen Van, PHONG Pham Duc, CHINH Mai Viet, PHONG Nguyen Viet. 采石场粉尘和海砂混合物力学性能试验和数值研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2728-2740.
[15] 王立安, 余云燕, 任新, 陈辉, . 循环荷载作用下分数阶饱和黏土地基的动力固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2279-2289.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!