岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (11): 3346-3354.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0093CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0093

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑不同级配影响的填石路基压实质量评价研究

卢正1,李梦威1, 2,唐楚轩1,胡智3,赵阳1,则志辉1, 2,姚海林1   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程安全全国重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071; 2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049;3. 浙江省交通运输科学研究院 浙江省道桥检测与养护技术研究重点实验室,浙江 杭州 310023
  • 收稿日期:2025-01-24 接受日期:2025-06-27 出版日期:2025-11-14 发布日期:2025-11-11
  • 作者简介:卢正,男,1982年生,博士,研究员,主要从事土力学及路基工程方面的研究。E-mail: lzwhrsm@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 42477205);湖北省自然科学基金创新群体项目(No. 2023AFA019);浙江省交通运输科技计划项目(No. 2024019);中国博士后科学基金(No. 2025M773267);国家资助博士后研究人员计划(No. GZC20252148)。

Research on evaluation of compaction quality of rock-filled subgrade considering the influence of different gradations

LU Zheng1, LI Meng-wei1, 2, TANG Chu-xuan1, HU Zhi3, ZHAO Yang1, ZE Zhi-hui1, 2, YAO Hai-lin1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering Safety, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Road and Bridge Detection and Maintenance Technology Research of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Scientific Research Institute of Transport, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310023, China
  • Received:2025-01-24 Accepted:2025-06-27 Online:2025-11-14 Published:2025-11-11
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42477205), the Innovation Group Project of Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (2023AFA019), Zhejiang Provincial Transportation Science and Technology Project (2024019), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2025M773267) and China Postdoctoral Fellowship Program of CPSF (GZC20252148).

摘要: 如何对填石路基的压实质量进行快速、准确的评价,是公路工程中一项亟待解决的难题。为此,建立了模拟填石路基在冲击载荷下响应的离散元-有限差分耦合模型,采用室内大型三轴试验标定了模型主要参数,通过计算数据与现场试验的对比验证了模型的正确性。进一步深入分析了5种常见级配填石路基在不同压实状态下的动力响应结果,讨论了级配分维度、孔隙率等对路基响应特征的影响。研究结果表明:(1)填石路基孔隙率与回弹模量之间具备良好的指数关系,在此基础上提出了沉降比的概念,并且发现了沉降比与路基孔隙率之间的线性关系,建议评价路基压实质量时同时将沉降比与回弹模量作为控制指标。(2)建立了考虑填料级配与孔隙率的填石路基回弹模量预测模型,发现填料级配对回弹模量影响显著,且级配分维度越接近2.31,回弹模量随孔隙率的降低速度越快。(3)沉降比为0时对应路基理想压实状态,在此基础上建立了考虑填料级配的路基理想状态临界回弹模量预测模型,发现临界模量随着填料分维度D的增加先增大后减小,在D=2.34时出现极大值。上述研究可为公路填石路基压实质量控制和评价提供科学依据。

关键词: 填石路基, 冲击荷载, 离散元-有限差分耦合, 压实质量, 颗粒级配

Abstract: Evaluating the compaction quality of rock-filled subgrades rapidly and accurately poses a pressing challenge in highway engineering. To address this, this study establishes a discrete element-finite difference coupling model to simulate the response of rock-filled subgrades under impact loading. The primary parameters of the model are calibrated using indoor large-scale triaxial tests, and the model’s accuracy is verified through comparisons between calculated and field data. Furthermore, this study conducts an in-depth analysis of the dynamic response results of five commonly used gradations of rock-filled subgrades under varying degrees of compaction, discussing the influence of gradation fractal dimension and porosity on subgrade deformation response. The findings are as follows: (1) A good exponential relationship between subgrade porosity and resilient modulus is identified, and the concept of settlement ratio is introduced, with a linear relationship between settlement ratio and subgrade porosity being verified. It is suggested that both resilient modulus and settlement ratio should be used as control indicators when evaluating subgrade compaction quality. (2) A prediction function for subgrade resilient modulus considering fill gradation and porosity is obtained, revealing that particle gradation has a significant impact on resilient modulus. Specifically, as the gradation fractal dimension approaches 2.31, the resilient modulus increases more rapidly with decreasing porosity. (3) A settlement ratio of zero corresponds to the ideal compaction state of the subgrade. This study establishes a prediction model for the critical resilient modulus of the subgrade in its ideal state, considering fill gradation, and finds that the critical modulus first increases and then decreases with increasing fractal dimension D, reaching a maximum when D=2.34. These findings aim to provide new methods and theories for evaluating the compaction quality of rock-filled subgrades in engineering.

Key words: rock-filled subgrade, impact load, discrete element-finite difference coupling, compaction quality, particle gradation

中图分类号: TU 415.1
[1] 沈扬, 沈嘉毅, 梁晖, 樊科伟. 基于3D打印技术的仿真钙质砂三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2353-2362.
[2] 李晓锋, 李海波, 刘黎旺, 傅帅旸, . 冲击荷载作用下岩石动态拉伸破坏特征及细观机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2387-2398.
[3] 姜立春, 李金柱, 李萍丰, 陈俊豪, . 顶板垮塌激励下多中段空区底板响应特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 916-929.
[4] 王莘晴, 张晓超, 裴向军, . 弃渣土体分形级配方程及最大干密度预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3157-3166.
[5] 李顺群, 蔡田明, 张勋程, 张丙坤, 杨长松, 周光毅, 周燕, . 冲击荷载作用下非饱和场地的三维应力响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 477-484.
[6] 蒋明杰, 李泽懿, 吉恩跃, 刘宇菠, 梅国雄, . 考虑级配影响的粗粒土−格栅最优网格尺寸试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2565-2572.
[7] 王磊, 杨震宇, 陈礼鹏, 王勇, 张帅, 王安铖, 李伟利, . 不同超临界CO2浸蚀时间后冲击煤体能量演化与破坏特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2251-2262.
[8] 金丹丹, 鲁先东, 王炳辉, 施展, 张雷, . 冲击荷载下含夹层饱和砂土孔压变化规律分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1081-1091.
[9] 张宪尚, 文光才, 朱哲明, 隆清明, 刘杰, . 冲击荷载下充填节理岩体I型裂纹动态扩展特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 396-406.
[10] 姜明归, 孙伟, 李金鑫, 樊锴, 刘增, . 冲击荷载下全尾砂胶结充填体断裂特性与能耗特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 186-196.
[11] 刘勇健, 傅杨攀, 赖明洋, 李彰明, 方昊圆, 谢治堃, . 冲击荷载下土体动力响应与加载速率效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2485-2494.
[12] 王磊, 张帅, 刘怀谦, 陈礼鹏, 朱传奇, 李少波, 王安铖, . 冲击荷载下含瓦斯煤能量耗散及损伤破坏规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1901-1915.
[13] 冉龙洲, 袁松, 王希宝, 王峥峥, 张生, . 明棚洞落石冲击荷载计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1748-1760.
[14] 张延杰, 何萌, 宋萌, 曹立, 赵海涛, 李梅. 富水砂卵石地层力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1739-1747.
[15] 丁瑜, 贾羽, 王晅, 张家生, 陈晓斌, 罗昊, 张宇, . 颗粒级配及初始干密度对路基翻浆冒泥特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2539-2549.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!