岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (1): 245-254.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0485CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0485

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑空间土拱效应的非饱和地层圆形基坑围护结构侧向土压力计算方法

徐杰1,张振光1,李海祥2   

  1. 1. 上海公路桥梁(集团)有限公司,上海 200433;2. 长安大学 建筑工程学院,陕西 西安 710061
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-13 接受日期:2025-10-15 出版日期:2026-01-11 发布日期:2026-01-08
  • 通讯作者: 张振光,男,1981年生,硕士,正高级工程师,主要从事地下工程施工与岩土工程等研究。E-mail: zhangzg8505@163.com
  • 作者简介:徐杰,男,1989年生,博士,高级工程师,主要从事深基坑与装配式竖井建造等研究。E-mail: xujie14315@hotmail.com
  • 基金资助:
    上海市住房和城乡建设管理委员会科研项目(沪建科2021-002-013);上海市2023年度“科技创新行动计划”(No.23DZ1202200);上海市青年科技启明星计划(No.24QB2702200)。

Calculation methods of lateral earth pressure on retaining structures for a circular foundation pit in unsaturated soils considering the spatial soil arching effect

XU Jie1, ZHANG Zhen-guang1, LI Hai-xiang2   

  1. 1. Shanghai Road and Bridge Group Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200433, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Chang’an University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710061, China
  • Received:2025-05-13 Accepted:2025-10-15 Online:2026-01-11 Published:2026-01-08
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Research Project of Shanghai Municipal Commission of Housing and Urban-rural Development (2021-002-013), 2023 Shanghai Action Plan for Science, Technology and Innovation (23DZ1202200) and Shanghai Rising-Star Program (24QB2702200).

摘要: 为合理描述非饱和地层圆形基坑围护结构侧向土压力沿深度的大小、分布、合力及作用点高度,基于非饱和土的吸应力理论与极限平衡法,首先推导了对吸应力均匀/线性分布都适用的围护结构后方土体滑动面倾角,然后组合竖向土拱和环向土拱的不同作用,建立了空间土拱效应下非饱和地层圆形基坑围护结构侧向土压力的计算方法,并对比已有理论解答和模型试验数据进行验证、分析相关因素的影响规律。研究结果表明:计算方法不仅与文献理论解答、模型试验数据吻合良好,验证了其准确性和合理性,而且有效解决了非饱和地层、空间土拱效应、结构-土体接触参数等对圆形基坑侧向土压力的综合影响,有助于实现圆形基坑的设计与施工优化,具有一定的理论意义和良好的应用前景;基坑侧向土压力合力随着地表吸应力的绝对值、环向应力系数、外黏聚力的增加而明显减小,而合力作用点高度的变化却不大;线性吸应力下的基坑侧向土压力大于均布吸应力下的,但均布吸应力下的侧向土压力变化更显著。

关键词: 圆形基坑, 侧向土压力, 空间土拱效应, 吸应力, 极限平衡法

Abstract: To reasonably capture the magnitude, distribution, resultant force, and action point height of lateral earth pressure with depth on retaining structures for a circular foundation pit in unsaturated soils, the inclination angle of the soil sliding surface behind retaining structures was first derived. The derivation, suitable for both uniform and linear profiles of suction stress, was based on the suction stress theory of unsaturated soils and the limit equilibrium method. Subsequently, a method for calculating lateral earth pressure on retaining structures of circular foundation pits in unsaturated soils was introduced by integrating the characteristics of vertical and circumferential soil arches to account for the spatial soil arching effect. Additionally, the proposed calculation method was validated by comparing it with existing theoretical solutions and model test data, and the influence of relevant factors was analyzed. The results show that the proposed calculation method not only demonstrates excellent consistency with existing theoretical solutions and model test data, confirming its accuracy and rationality, but also effectively addresses the comprehensive effects of unsaturated formation, spatial soil arching, and structure-soil contact parameters on the lateral earth pressure of circular foundation pits. This contributes to optimizing the design and construction of circular foundation pits. Consequently, the proposed calculation method holds theoretical significance and promising practical applications. The resultant force of lateral earth pressure for a foundation pit significantly decreases with an increase in absolute value of surface suction stress, circumferential stress coefficient, and external cohesion. However, the variation in the action point height of the resultant force remains relatively minor. Lateral earth pressure under a linear profile of suction stress is greater than under a uniform profile. However, the variation in lateral earth pressure is more pronounced under the uniform profile of suction stress

Key words: circular foundation pit, lateral earth pressure, spatial soil arching effect, suction stress, limit equilibrium method

中图分类号: TU 432
[1] 金国龙, 李鸿桥, 谢雄耀, . 圆形地连墙分载法受力计算理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 81-91.
[2] 彭海游, 谢强, 陈柏林, 檀康, 王琦, 杨文君, . 基于极限平衡法的危岩倾覆稳定性三维计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 552-562.
[3] 周志雄, 周凤玺, 曹小林, 汪镇, . 复合地基极限承载力的变分极限平衡法分析——竖向增强[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3748-3754.
[4] 易琪, 孙冠华, 姚院峰, 桂本, 商浩亮, 纪文栋, . 压缩空气储能地下内衬硐库上覆岩体稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3523-3532.
[5] 张小波, 张雕, 姚池, 杨建华, 蒋水华, 荣耀. 考虑微拱效应的隧道洞口段管棚合理间距确定方法及参数分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1625-1635.
[6] 徐方, 张期树, 冷伍明, 邓志龙, 董俊利, 刘思慧, . 基于附加应力扩散效应的新型预应力路堤 稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 431-442.
[7] 仉文岗, 王琦, 刘汉龙, 陈福勇, . 岩体空间变异性对隧道拱顶失效概率的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1462-1472.
[8] 章瑞环, 叶帅华, 陶晖. 基于改进极限平衡法的多级均质黄土边 坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 813-825.
[9] 孙曦源, 衡朝阳, 周智, 张剑涛. 某超浅埋过街通道围岩压力的极限平衡求解方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 312-318.
[10] 李英俊, 夏元友, 王智德. 地震作用下土钉支护边坡震后位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 3013-3021.
[11] 李书兆, 王忠畅, 贾 旭, 贺林林, . 软黏土中张紧式吸力锚循环承载力简化计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1704-1712.
[12] 段晓梦,曾立峰, . 非饱和土的承载结构与岩土广义结构性[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3103-3112.
[13] 闫澍旺,李 嘉,闫 玥,陈 浩,. 黏性土地基中竖向圆孔的极限稳定深度研究[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1176-1181.
[14] 周凤玺,曹小林,马 强,. 颗粒间的毛细作用以及吸应力特征曲线分析[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 2036-2042.
[15] 杨明辉,戴夏斌,赵明华,罗 宏. 曲线滑裂面下有限宽度填土主动土压力计算[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 2029-2035.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!