岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2): 402-412.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0675CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0675

• 压缩空气储能地下工程专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

恒刚度约束膨胀仪的研制与膨润土试验应用

谈云志1, 2, 3,郭金辉2, 3,吴克宇2, 3,明华军1, 2,王冲2, 3,吴军2, 3   

  1. 1. 三峡大学 水利与环境学院,湖北 宜昌 443002;2. 三峡大学 特殊土土力学研究所,湖北 宜昌 443002; 3. 三峡大学 防灾减灾湖北省重点实验室,湖北 宜昌 443002
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-30 接受日期:2025-10-15 出版日期:2026-02-10 发布日期:2026-02-04
  • 通讯作者: 明华军,男,1984年生,博士,副教授,主要从事特殊土土力学方面的研究。E-mail: hjming@ctgu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:谈云志,男,1979年生,博士,教授,主要从事特殊土土力学与特殊土资源化利用方面的研究。E-mail: yztan@ctgu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省自然科学基金(No. 2024AFA004,No. 2023AFD198);国家自然科学基金(No. 52279102)

Development and experimental verification of constant stiffness swelling apparatus

TAN Yun-zhi1, 2, 3, GUO Jin-hui2, 3, WU Ke-yu2, 3, MING Hua-jun1, 2, WANG Chong2, 3, WU Jun2, 3   

  1. 1. College of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China; 2. The Institute of Problematic Soils Mechanics, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China; 3. Hubei Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China
  • Received:2025-06-30 Accepted:2025-10-15 Online:2026-02-10 Published:2026-02-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (2024AFA004, 2023AFD198) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52279102).

摘要: 在压气储能地下储气库中构建“膨润土-薄钢板”复合密封层结构,该密封层中膨润土吸水膨胀挤压薄钢板、薄钢板受压产生弹性反力约束膨润土膨胀,故膨润土属于恒刚度约束的膨胀行为。为模拟该行为,研制了功能齐全、操作方便、成本低廉的膨胀仪。仪器主要由底座、试样仓、活塞、恒刚度约束反力架、注水控制器、数据采集盒等组成。以团粒膨润土为研究对象,开展了验证性试验。结果表明,仪器可完整再现膨润土在恒刚度约束下的膨胀行为,与分级加载平衡法得到的试验结果相比,相同膨胀率下前者膨胀力普遍大于后者;而且,前者的试验结果更加符合真实情况。通过变换反力架的约束组合,该仪器还可用于模拟恒体积膨胀力、无荷膨胀率测试;同时,联合特制的高压加载系统(最大加载20 MPa),可开展膨润土膨胀后的加、卸载试验,研究储气库充、放气过程中膨润土变形行为,初步论证了“膨润土-薄钢板”复合密封层结构合理性,充分展示了该仪器的可靠性和可拓展性,体现了一机多用的功能优势。

关键词: 膨胀仪, 恒刚度约束, 膨润土, 压气储能

Abstract: A composite sealing layer structure of “bentonite-thin steel plate” has been constructed in the lined rock caverns (LRC) for compressed air energy storage (CAES). In this sealing layer, bentonite absorbs water and expands, thereby squeezing the thin steel plate. The thin steel plate generates an elastic reaction force under pressure, which in turn restrains the expansion of bentonite. Therefore, the swelling behavior of bentonite falls under the category of expansion under constant stiffness constraint. To simulate this behavior, a swelling apparatus with comprehensive functions, convenient operation and low cost was developed. The instrument mainly consists of the instrument base, sample chamber, piston, constant stiffness constraint reaction frame, water injection controller, data acquisition box, and so on. With granular bentonite as the research object, verification tests were conducted. The findings indicate that the instrument is capable of accurately replicating the swelling behavior of bentonite under the constant stiffness constraint. Compared with the results obtained by the staged loading equilibrium method, the swelling pressure of the former is generally higher than that of the latter at the same swelling ratio. Moreover, the results of the former are more consistent with the real situation. By changing the constraint combination of the reaction frame, the instrument can also be used to simulate swelling behaviors under constant volume constraint and zero-loading constraint. Meanwhile, in conjunction with the specially designed high- pressure loading system (with a maximum loading capacity of 20 MPa), the loading and unloading tests of bentonite after expansion can be carried out to investigate the deformation behavior of bentonite during the charging and discharging processes of the CAES. The preliminary demonstration of the rationality of the “bentonite-thin steel plate” composite sealing layer structure fully underscores the reliability and scalability of the instrument, highlighting its functional advantage of “one machine serving multiple purposes”

Key words: swelling apparatus, constant stiffness constraint, bentonite, compressed air energy storage (CAES)

中图分类号: TU 443
[1] 张桂民, 孙文卿, 朱泽凡, 苏永康, 朱旭聪. 施工缝隙对压气储能硐室钢衬受力的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 485-496.
[2] 马田田, 刘亭利, 郝丰富, 杨聪发, 万勇. 层电荷对膨润土收缩行为影响的试验和理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 39-48.
[3] 曾召田, 林铭宇, 孙德安, 邵捷昇, 曹珊珊, 赵长友, 靳琳. 高温条件下膨润土缓冲层材料导热性能的热老化时间效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 171-182.
[4] 付强, 杨科, 刘钦节, 宋涛涛, 吴犇牛, 于鹏, . 交变荷载下围岩−衬砌组合结构界面强度特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 40-52.
[5] 吴子龙, 俞韬, 闫超, 邓永锋, 胡广青, 高宇航, 王璋, 王力, . 陕西黄土重金属污染分析与黄土/膨润土隔离墙处治初探[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2738-2748.
[6] 谈云志, 吴克宇, 明华军, 孙德安, . 团粒膨润土振动密实性与恒刚度约束膨胀行为[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2399-2408.
[7] 刘少华, 夏才初, 徐英俊, 徐晨, . 高内气压作用下岩石破裂特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3431-3440.
[8] 张世殊, 徐国庆, 夏才初, 王升, . 压气储能地下洞室二衬预设缝参数优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3208-3218.
[9] 程鑫, 江文豪, 黄啸, 李爽, 王应富, 李江山, . 自硬化竖向屏障材料在Cr(Ⅵ)污染液作用下工程性能及微观结构演化[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 225-238.
[10] 郝丰富, 马田田, 于海文, 韦昌富, 田慧会, 伊盼盼, . 阳离子交换量对膨润土层间水化影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2611-2620.
[11] 陈宝, 向平, 邓荣升, . 膨润土胶体在处置库围岩裂隙中的扩散模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 433-442.
[12] 鲁青云, 徐英俊, 夏才初, 刘少华, . 纤维增强柔性混凝土压气储能地下洞室力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3566-3575.
[13] 张格诚, 徐晨, 夏才初, . 考虑剪切变形的高压储气洞室复合式预设缝衬砌力学特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3533-3544.
[14] 彭宇, 张虎元, 周光平, 谭煜, . 酒精湿化法调配压实膨润土缓冲回填材料含水率研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 235-244.
[15] 曾召田, 张瀚彬, 邵捷昇, 车东泽, 吕海波, 梁珍, . MX-80膨润土高温老化时间效应的细微观分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 145-153.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!