岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4): 1340-1350.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0303CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0303

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

自由应变下多级堆载预压联合电渗-真空排水径向固结特性分析

张京1,宗梦繁1, 2,吴文兵3,张驿1,梅国雄4   

  1. 1.江苏海洋大学 土木与港海工程学院,江苏 连云港222005;2.天津大学 建筑工程学院,天津 300072; 3.中国地质大学 工程学院,湖北 武汉430074;4.浙江大学 海洋学院,浙江 舟山316021
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-25 接受日期:2025-06-23 出版日期:2026-04-13 发布日期:2026-04-16
  • 通讯作者: 宗梦繁,男,1992年生,博士,讲师,硕士生导师,主要从事固结理论及软土加固技术方面的研究。E-mail: zongmengf@163.com
  • 作者简介:张京,男,2000年生,硕士研究生,主要从事软土固结理论方面的研究。E-mail: zhangjing62158@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    中国博士后科学基金(No.2024M762361);江苏省高等学校基础学科(自然科学)研究面上项目(No.23KJB560004);江苏海洋大学研究生科研与实践创新计划(No.KYCX2024-15)。

Analysis of radial consolidation characteristics of multi-stage surcharge preloading combined with electroosmosis-vacuum drainage under free strain condition

ZHANG Jing1, ZONG Meng-fan1, 2, WU Wen-bing3, ZHANG Yi1, MEI Guo-xiong4   

  1. 1. School of Civil and Ocean Engineering, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang, Jiangsu 222005, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; 3. Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China; 4. Ocean College, Zhejiang University, Zhoushan, Zhejiang 316021, China
  • Received:2025-03-25 Accepted:2025-06-23 Online:2026-04-13 Published:2026-04-16
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2024M762361), the Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China (23KJB560004) and the Postgraduate Research and Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Ocean University (KYCX2024-15).

摘要: 在淤泥等超软土加固中,传统的单一加固方法往往无法达到满意的加固效果。基于自由应变假定,考虑涂抹效应、多级加载和具有时间效应的真空压力,利用贝塞尔函数和特征函数法推导出电渗-真空-堆载预压联合作用下土体径向固结解析解。所提出的解决方案通过模型退化与现有解和实验室试验数据对比,验证了该解决方案的正确性。随后,探讨了多级荷载、渗透系数和真空压力对土体固结特性的影响。结果表明:相较于单级加载,多级加载方式可有效降低堆载过程中产生的超静孔隙水压力,避免超静孔隙水压力的急剧上升。涂抹区电渗系数的降低会显著延缓孔压消散与土体固结速率,水力渗透系数对固结前期的孔压影响不大,主要影响固结后期,因此不能忽视涂抹效应对联合预压的影响。未扰动区的土体固结受电渗的影响更大,涂抹区的土体固结受真空压力的影响更大。

关键词: 径向固结, 电渗-真空预压, 自由应变, 多级堆载预压, 解析解

Abstract: For ultra-soft soils such as sludge, traditional single-method reinforcement often fails to achieve satisfactory stabilization. Assuming free strain and accounting for the smear effect, multi-stage loading, and time-dependent vacuum pressure, we derive an analytical solution for radial consolidation of soil under the combined effects of electro-osmosis, vacuum, and staged loading, using Bessel functions and the method of characteristic functions. The solution was verified by comparing the model degradation with existing solutions and laboratory test data. Subsequently, we examined the effects of multi-stage loading, the permeability coefficient, and vacuum pressure on soil consolidation. Results indicate that, compared with single-stage loading, multi-stage loading more effectively reduces excess pore water pressure during loading and prevents sharp increases in pore water pressure. Reductions in the electro-osmotic coefficient within the smear zone significantly delay pore pressure dissipation and slow soil consolidation. The hydraulic conductivity has little effect on pore pressure in the early consolidation stage but markedly affects the later stage; thus the smear effect under combined preloading cannot be ignored. The consolidation in undisturbed soil zones is more significantly influenced by electroosmosis, while consolidation in smear zones is more affected by vacuum pressure.

Key words: radial consolidation, electroosmotic-vacuum preloading, free strain, multi-stage surcharge preloading, analytical solution

中图分类号: TU 47
[1] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[2] 周航, 汪义圣, 亓戈平, . 黏弹性土中异形桩横向动力响应半解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 761-774.
[3] 王浩, 侯泓冰, 江文豪, . 考虑根系对水文特性影响下非饱和植被土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3329-3345.
[4] 张智卿, 刘鑫, 刘开富, 吴君涛, 吴文兵, . 横观各向同性土体中端承桩水平振动特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3371-3382.
[5] 江学辉, 颜建伟, 罗文俊, 李佳宝, 徐长节. 纵向压力和加固钢板对隧道力学性能影响的解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1623-1632.
[6] 王亦炀, 李传勋, 李阔, 陆向综. 竖井地基大应变非线性固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1446-1456.
[7] 刘景锦, 罗学思, 雷华阳, 郑刚, 罗昊鹏, . 等应变条件下增压式真空预压固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 809-821.
[8] 高柳, 吕述晖, 王奎华, . 缺陷桩-梁系统的动力特性应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 3095-3104.
[9] 张玉国, 杨文兵, 赵雅纯, 王闯, 赵亚敏. 双向渗流下考虑应力时空效应的组合桩复合地基固结理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 184-196.
[10] 余俊, 李东凯, 和振, 张志中. 带有两端防渗墙坝基的各向异性渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2381-2388.
[11] 黄娟, 和振, 余俊, 杨鑫歆. 渗透各向异性圆形围堰稳态渗流场解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1035-1043.
[12] 郑长杰, 崔亦秦, 吴琛, 罗通, 栾鲁宝, . 竖向入射S波作用下单桩水平地震响应简化解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 327-336.
[13] 余俊, 张志中, 郑靖凡, 和振. 水位波动条件下有封底基坑渗流场孔压解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3415-3423.
[14] 余俊, 张扬, 郑靖凡, 张志中. 考虑潜水面的基坑二维稳态渗流场解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(11): 3109-3116.
[15] 李炯, 李明广, 詹红兵, 陈锦剑, 夏小和, 张硕. 井周堵塞对承压含水层定流量回灌渗流场影响的半解析研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 2871-2878.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!