岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4): 1401-1416.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0592CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0592

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

液化场地地震动作用下典型建筑物易损性增量分析

张钰洋1,袁晓铭1,陈龙伟1,袁近远2,王淼3,李瑞山1,吴晓阳1   

  1. 1.中国地震局工程力学研究所 中国地震局地震工程与工程振动重点实验室,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150080; 2.黑龙江科技大学 建筑工程学院,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150027;3.黑龙江省水利科学研究院,黑龙江 哈尔滨 100050
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-09 接受日期:2026-01-24 出版日期:2026-04-13 发布日期:2026-04-16
  • 通讯作者: 袁晓铭,男,1963年生,博士,研究员,主要从事土动力学与地震工程研究。E-mail: yxmiem@163.com
  • 作者简介:张钰洋,女,2000年生,博士研究生,主要从事防灾减灾工程研究。E-mail: pretzelmore@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    中国地震局工程力学研究所基本科研业务费重点专项(No.2024A03);国家自然科学基金(No.52408525);黑龙江省自然科学基金(No.ZD2023E008)。

Incremental fragility analysis of typical buildings on liquefied sites under ground motion

ZHANG Yu-yang1, YUAN Xiao-ming1, CHEN Long-wei1, YUAN Jin-yuan2, WANG Miao3, LI Rui-shan1, WU Xiao-yang1   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150080, China; 2. School of Architectural Engineering, Heilongjiang University of Science and Technology, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150027, China; 3. Heilongjiang Hydraulic Research Institute, Harbin, Heilongjiang 100050, China
  • Received:2025-06-09 Accepted:2026-01-24 Online:2026-04-13 Published:2026-04-16
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Scientific Research Fund of Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration (2024A03), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52408525) and the Heilongjiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (ZD2023E008).

摘要: 液化场地的地震动具有特殊性,明晰其对上部结构破坏的影响,是工程合理抗震设防的基础。以实际震害资料为背景,通过典型建筑物易损性分析,揭示液化场地地震动对工程结构破坏的影响机制与实际作用。以2011年新西兰6.3 级地震震害调查为背景,提取液化场地和非液化场地地震动实测记录,并建立一层民居和六层结构两种典型建筑物易损性分析模型。基于国际上通用的OpenSees计算程序,采用地震动实测记录,分别计算结构在液化与非液化场地地震动作用下的结构易损性,以二者之差作为液化所引起的结构易损性增量,并与实际震害进行对比,提出液化场地地震动对两种典型建筑物震动响应的影响机制与影响程度。成果可深化液化场地对工程结构破坏影响的认识,同时可为推动液化场地工程结构抗震设计理论的发展提供指导。

关键词: 实际震害, 液化场地地震动, 典型建筑物易损性, 破坏超越概率增量

Abstract: Ground motions at liquefied sites exhibit distinct characteristics. Clarifying their impact on the damage to superstructures is fundamental for rational seismic fortification in engineering. Using actual seismic-damage data, this study reveals how ground motions at liquefied sites influence structural damage via fragility analysis of typical building types. Against the backdrop of the 2011 M6.3 earthquake in New Zealand, we have compiled actual seismic records from both liquefiable and non-liquefiable sites, and constructed fragility analysis models for two archetypal buildings: a single-story residence and a six-story structure. Using the widely used OpenSees software, we compute the seismic fragility of structures under records from liquefied and non-liquefied sites, respectively. The difference between the results is defined as the fragility increment due to liquefaction and is compared with observed seismic damage. The influence mechanism and degree of seismic ground motion in liquefiable sites on the vibration response of two typical buildings are proposed. The findings enhance the understanding of the influence of liquefied sites on engineering structural damage and can provide guidance for advancing the theoretical development of seismic design for structures on liquefiable sites.

Key words: actual seismic damage, ground motion on liquefied sites, fragility of typical building, damage exceedance probability increment

中图分类号: TU 435
[1] EVGENII Kozhevnikov, MIKHAIL Turbakov, ZAKHAR Ivanov, EVGENII Riabokon, ANDREI Golosov, MIKHAIL Guzev, EVGENII Gladkikh, DANIIL Katunin, PAVEL Kamenev. 3D液晶显示打印试样用作岩土力学 岩样模拟物的可行性评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1129-1146.
[2] 刘红帅, 丁泊文, 宋东松, 李羿, 王永志. 柔性叠层剪切箱在干砂场地离心试验中的边界效应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1219-1228.
[3] 邵龙潭, 孙衍朴, 董浩. 非饱和土渗流运动方程的推导及验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 640-646.
[4] 王滢, 耿源, 高盟, 孔凡玲. 爆炸荷载作用下横观各向同性饱和土中衬砌隧道的轴对称瞬态响应解答[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 160-170.
[5] 陈灯红, 张心瀚, 刘云辉, 胡昊文, 刘云龙, 梁羽翔, . 基于八叉树比例边界有限元法的高拱坝-不规则地基-库水系统非线性地震响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2586-2599.
[6] 钱法桥, 邓亚虹, 慕焕东, 杨楠, 刘凡, 王梦晨, . 基于小波变换和拟动力法的边坡地震稳定性评价方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 88-96.
[7] 李金宇, 王伟, 王浩宇, 杨研科, 徐凯放, 张晓庆, 熊文. 地震序列作用下液化场地条件影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1551-1559.
[8] 赵程斌, 骆亚生, 范全, 孟智田, 孙哲. 基于触发式黏塑性元件的黏性土黏弹塑性动本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 502-510.
[9] 吴小锋, 张笛, 李星, 汪玉冰, 文凯, . 可液化场地桩基震后水平变形预测模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 77-86.
[10] 刘洪涛, 韩子俊, 刘勤裕, 陈子晗, 韩洲, 张红凯, 杨永松. 巷道蝶形破坏强度准则低敏感性研究及工程应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 117-130.
[11] 张晓笛, 段冰, 吴健, 王金昌, 杨仲轩, 龚晓南, 徐荣桥, . 混凝土芯水泥土复合桩竖向承载特性分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 173-183.
[12] 梁小丛, 陈平山, 刘志军, 王永志, 朱明星, . 离心机振动台模型试验验证的珊瑚礁砂液化判别方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(11): 3173-3181.
[13] 栾纪元, 王冀鹏. 基于4D显微成像的非饱和颗粒土微观力学与渗流试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(11): 3252-3260.
[14] 余俊, 郑靖凡, 杨鑫歆, 李东凯. 土压平衡盾构渗流场解析解及喷涌判别研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 572-580.
[15] 杨洋, 孙锐, . 基于剪切波速的液化可能性等级评估表法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 634-644.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!