岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (6): 2178-2188.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0530CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0530

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

导洞条件下隧洞围岩应变能调整与破坏规律研究

张翔宇1,严鹏2,高乔裕2,周朝2,杨招伟1,刘晓2,吴家耀1,朱永生1   

  1. 1. 雅江清洁能源科学技术研究(北京)有限公司,北京 100048;2. 武汉大学 水资源工程与调度全国重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430072
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-24 接受日期:2025-07-22 出版日期:2026-06-11 发布日期:2026-06-08
  • 通讯作者: 严鹏,男,1981年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩石动力学与工程爆破等方面的研究工作。E-mail: pyanwhu@whu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:张翔宇,男,1996年生,博士,主要从事深埋隧洞开挖风险防控与工程爆破等方面的研究工作。E-mail: zxywhu@whu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No.52379108);2023年度湖北省博士后创新研究岗位(No.325469)。

Strain energy adjustment and failure law of tunnel surrounding rock under excavated pilot tunnel

ZHANG Xiang-yu1, YAN Peng2, GAO Qiao-yu2, ZHOU Chao2, YANG Zhao-wei1, LIU Xiao2, WU Jia-yao1, ZHU Yong-sheng1   

  1. 1. Yajiang Clean Energy Science and Technology Research (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing 100048, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Water Resources Engineering and Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China
  • Received:2025-05-24 Accepted:2025-07-22 Online:2026-06-11 Published:2026-06-08
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (52379108) and the Postdoctoral Innovation Research Post in Hubei Province in 2023 (325469).

摘要: 跨流域长距离大断面输水隧洞施工过程中,多采用小直径钻爆导洞或隧道掘进机(tunnel boring machine,简称TBM)导洞先行开挖,以探明未知地质情况并进行围岩风险控制。由于工期及施工条件的限制,这些导洞将会存在较长时间。因此,需要厘清导洞条件下隧洞围岩应变能调整与破坏规律,为导洞开挖及后续二次扩挖提供技术支撑。本研究首先采用数值模拟方法揭示导洞开挖诱发的应变能调整规律,然后结合室内试验与现场试验进行验证分析。结果表明:当导洞开挖时,将会使二次扩挖掌子面附近的应变能先进行释放,然后在围岩深处重新积聚,再次积聚的应变能峰值显著降低,且应变能峰值距隧洞表面的距离逐渐增加并保持稳定。故导洞存在时,围岩受持续加载破坏试验中,声发射幅值降低,围岩破坏程度降低,且围岩破坏位置远离扩挖掌子面。结合现场试验结果可知,导洞开挖稳定段的应力释放深度较浅,距掌子面越近,围岩应力释放深度越大,且将会超过二次扩挖轮廓线,降低爆破扩挖与TBM扩挖的扰动程度。

关键词: 导洞, 围岩破坏, 应变能释放, 声波测试

Abstract: During the construction of long-distance large-section water conveyance tunnels across watersheds, small-diameter drilling and blasting pilot tunnels or tunnel boring machine (TBM) pilot tunnels are often used for pilot excavation to explore unknown geological conditions and manage risks associated with the surrounding rock. However, due to the constraints of the construction period and conditions, these pilot tunnels will exist for a relatively long period of time. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify the adjustment and failure laws of strain energy in the surrounding rock of the tunnel under the conditions of pilot tunnels, providing technical support for the excavation of pilot tunnels and subsequent secondary expansion excavation. Initially, this study utilizes numerical simulation to elucidate the adjustment mechanisms of strain energy triggered by pilot tunnel excavation, subsequently corroborating these findings through laboratory and field experiments. The results indicate that during the excavation of the pilot tunnel, the strain energy near the secondary expansion excavation face is initially released, then re-accumulated deep within surrounding rock. The peak value of the re-accumulated strain energy significantly decreases, and the distance between the peak value of the strain energy and the tunnel surface gradually increases and remain stable. Therefore, when the pilot tunnel exists, the degree of rock failure and the amplitude of acoustic emission decrease during the continuous loading experiments of the surrounding rock, and the location of rock failure is far away from the expansion excavation face. Based on the field acoustic monitoring test results, it can be concluded that the stress release depth of the stable section of the pilot tunnel excavation is relatively shallow. As the distance to the tunnel face decreases, the stress-release depth of the surrounding rock increases and may extend beyond the contour line of the secondary enlargement excavation, thereby reducing the disturbance caused by blasting and TBM excavation.

Key words: pilot tunnels, surrounding rock failure, strain energy release, sonic wave testing

中图分类号: TV68
[1] 张治国, 李乃义, 牛瑞, 王安源, 朱正国, . 考虑中导洞施工效应的双连拱隧道应力与位移复变函数解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 141-158.
[2] 汤华, 姜成业, 邓琴, 毕钛俊, 秦雨樵, . 浅埋无中导洞连拱隧道先行洞衬砌承担围岩荷载确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1170-1180.
[3] 王田龙, 陈从新, 夏开宗, 邵勇, 刘轩廷, 杨括宇, 周意超, . 陡倾结构金属矿山采空区围岩破坏机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1487-1500.
[4] 池小楼, 杨科, 刘文杰, 付强, 魏祯, . 大倾角煤层分层综采再生顶板破断规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1391-1400.
[5] 孙钱程, 郑民总, 李邵军, 郭浩森, 程 远, 裴书锋, 江 权, . 柱状节理岩体隧洞松弛深度的 变异特性与确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 728-736.
[6] 张传庆,高 阳,刘 宁,周 辉,冯夏庭, . 深埋隧洞力学响应监测与测试设计的思考[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2626-2631.
[7] 闫长斌. 基于声波频谱特征的岩体爆破累积损伤效应分析[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2721-2727.
[8] 周建军 ,杨振兴 , . 深埋长隧道TBM施工关键问题探讨[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 299-305.
[9] 刘成禹 ,何满潮,. 古建筑风化石质构件力学参数的确定方法[J]. , 2014, 299(2): 474-480.
[10] 孙旭曙 ,李建林 ,王乐华 ,陈兴周 ,李 飞 ,程 冬,. 节理岩体超声测试及单轴压缩试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(12): 3473-3478.
[11] 江 权 ,冯夏庭 ,徐鼎平 ,赵 阳 ,江亚丽 ,黄 可. 基于围岩片帮形迹的宏观地应力估计方法探讨[J]. , 2011, 32(5): 1452-1459.
[12] 肖亚勋 冯夏庭 陈炳瑞 丰光亮 张照太 明华军. 深埋隧洞极强岩爆段隧道掘进机半导洞掘进岩爆风险研究[J]. , 2011, 32(10): 3111-3118.
[13] 朱正国,乔春生,高保彬. 浅埋偏压连拱隧道的施工优化及支护受力特征分析[J]. , 2008, 29(10): 2747-2752.
[14] 伍佑伦 ,王元汉 . 不连续面激活与巷道围岩破坏区关系的探讨[J]. , 2007, 28(6): 1197-1200.
[15] 邱一平,林卓英. 花岗岩样品高温后损伤的试验研究[J]. , 2006, 27(6): 1005-1010.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!