岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (7): 2235-2247.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0588CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0588

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于机器学习的陇西黄土湿陷系数预测及可解释性分析

刘德仁,王凯强,张延杰,王帅群,王宇飞   

  1. 兰州交通大学 土木工程学院,甘肃 兰州 730070
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-09 接受日期:2026-03-03 出版日期:2026-07-13 发布日期:2026-07-08
  • 作者简介:刘德仁,男,1978年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土工程相关的教学与研究工作。E-mail: liuderen@mail.lzjtu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.51868038)

Machine learning-based prediction and interpretability analysis of Longxi loess collapsibility coefficient

LIU De-ren, WANG Kai-qiang, ZHANG Yan-jie, WANG Shuai-qun, WANG Yu-fei   

  1. School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University., Lanzhou, Gansu 730070, China
  • Received:2025-06-09 Accepted:2026-03-03 Online:2026-07-13 Published:2026-07-08
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51868038).

摘要:

黄土湿陷系数预测方法以回归分析为主,但受黄土区域性影响显著,预测准确度不足。现有的机器学习预测方法存在解释性局限。针对陇西地区黄土,通过相关性与聚类分析筛选密度、饱和度、自重应力、液限和内摩擦角5个关键影响因素,基于极端梯度提升树(extreme gradient boosting,简称XGBoost)、随机森林(random forest,简称RF)、支持向量机(support vector machine,简称SVM)和回归分析方法构建了黄土湿陷系数预测模型,并结合沙普利加性解释(Shapley additive explanations,简称SHAP)技术对预测结果进行了可解释性分析。研究结果表明:陇西黄土湿陷系数与密度、干密度、孔隙比、饱和度、内摩擦角等指标的相关系数在0.63~0.90之间,具有极强或强的相关性;XGBoost模型和RF模型的湿陷系数及湿陷性等级预测准确率均超90%,性能优于SVM模型和回归方法。SHAP分析揭示,密度小于1.44 g/cm3的黄土湿陷概率较高,饱和度大于29.0%的黄土湿陷等级相对较低,且处于高饱和度、高自重应力状态下的黄土湿陷倾向性更弱,湿陷性等级更低。研究结果可为陇西地区黄土工程建设提供理论参考。

关键词: 陇西黄土, 湿陷系数, 参数相关性分析, 机器学习, SHAP可解释性分析

Abstract:

The prediction methods for the collapsibility coefficient of loess are predominantly based on regression analysis, but they are significantly influenced by the regional characteristics of loess, leading to insufficient prediction accuracy. Furthermore, existing machine learning prediction methods have limitations in interpretability. Focusing on the loess in the Longxi region, five pivotal influencing factors, namely, density, saturation, self-weight stress, liquid limit, and internal friction angle, were identified through correlation and cluster analyses. Subsequently, prediction models for the loess collapsibility coefficient were constructed using extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and regression analysis. Additionally, an interpretability analysis of the prediction outcomes was performed using the Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) technique. The results show that the correlation coefficients between the collapsibility coefficient of Longxi loess and various indices such as density, dry density, void ratio, saturation, and internal friction angle range from 0.63 to 0.90, indicating extremely strong or strong correlations. Both the XGBoost and RF models demonstrate a prediction accuracy exceeding 90% for the collapsibility coefficient and collapsibility grade, thereby outperforming the SVM model and conventional regression methods. The SHAP analysis reveals that loess with a density less than 1.44 g/cm3 has a higher probability of collapsibility, while loess with a saturation greater than 29.0% has a relatively lower collapsibility grade. Moreover, loess under high saturation and high self-weight stress conditions exhibits weaker collapsibility tendency and lower collapsibility grade. The findings provide a theoretical reference for loess engineering construction in the Longxi region.

Key words: Longxi loess, collapsibility coefficient, parameter correlation analysis, machine learning, SHAP interpretability analysis

中图分类号: TU 452
[1] 孙嘉豪, 李地元, 解联库. 硬岩矿柱稳定性预测的改进稳健随机森林算法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(5): 1788-1800.
[2] 葛鑫博, 黄俊, 赵同彬, 陶刚, 马洪岭, 王威. 人工智能在压缩空气储能地下工程中的应用综述[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 413-425.
[3] 江晓童, 张西文, 吕颖慧, 李仁杰, 江浩, . 机器学习在岩土工程中的应用现状与未来展望[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 419-436.
[4] 蔡启航, 董学超, 郭明伟, 卢正, 徐安, 蒋凡, . 基于刃脚土压力的超大锚碇沉井基础下沉智能预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 377-388.
[5] 真嘉捷, 赖丰文, 黄明, 廖清香, 李爽, 段岳强. 基于时序聚类和在线学习的盾构掘进地层智能识别方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3615-3625.
[6] 贺隆平, 姚囝, 王其虎, 叶义成, 凌济锁, . 基于自动机器学习的岩爆烈度分级预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2839-2848.
[7] 龙潇, 孙锐, 郑桐, . 基于卷积神经网络的液化预测模型及可解释性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2741-2753.
[8] 杨洋, 魏怡童. 基于分类树的液化概率等级评估新方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2175-2186.
[9] 邓志兴, 谢康, 李泰灃, 王武斌, 郝哲睿, 李佳珅, . 基于粗颗粒嵌锁点高铁级配碎石振动压实质量控制新方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1835-1849.
[10] 潘秋景, 吴洪涛, 张子龙, 宋克志, . 基于多域物理信息神经网络的复合地层隧道掘进地表沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 539-551.
[11] 蒋明镜, 张卢丰, 韩亮, 姜朋明, . 基于符号回归算法的结构性砂土损伤规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3768-3778.
[12] 吴爽爽, 胡新丽, 孙少锐, 魏继红, . 间歇式滑坡变形力学机制与单体预警案例研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 593-602.
[13] 董学超, 郭明伟, 王水林, . 基于LightGBM的超大沉井下沉状态预测及传感器优化布置[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1789-1799.
[14] 仉文岗, 顾鑫, 刘汉龙, 张青, 王林, 王鲁琦, . 基于贝叶斯更新的非饱和土坡参数概率 反演及变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 1112-1122.
[15] 王铁行, 金 鑫, 罗 扬, 张松林. 考虑卸荷作用的黄土湿陷性评价方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1281-1290.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!