岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (7): 2324-2336.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0792CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0792

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

预应力钢锚管-锚索组合结构承载力及失效机制研究

袁坤1, 2   

  1. 1.中国铁道科学研究院集团有限公司 铁道建筑研究所,北京 100081;2.高速铁路轨道系统全国重点实验室,北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-25 接受日期:2025-12-11 出版日期:2026-07-13 发布日期:2026-07-08
  • 作者简介:袁坤,男,1989年生,博士,高级工程师,主要从事地质灾害防治方面的研究。E-mail: yuankun0616@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    中国铁道科学研究院集团有限公司基金项目(No.2023YJ221,No.2024YJ393)。

Bearing capacity and failure mechanism of prestressed steel anchor pipe-anchor cable composite structures

YUAN Kun1, 2   

  1. 1. Railway Engineering Research Institute, China Academy of Railway Sciences Corporation Limited, Beijing 100081, China; 2. State Key Laboratory for Track Systems of High-speed Railway, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2025-07-25 Accepted:2025-12-11 Online:2026-07-13 Published:2026-07-08
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by China Academy of Railway Sciences Group Co., Ltd. Fund Project (2023YJ221, 2024YJ393).

摘要: 当前预应力钢锚管-锚索组合结构在承载力设计中,往往忽略锚索、注浆体、钢锚管与围岩4种材料及其界面的力学性质,导致理论研究滞后于工程实践。为深入揭示各参数对预应力钢锚管-锚索组合结构承载力及失效机制的影响,设计并开展了4组足尺试验,并结合数值模拟的方法对承载力、破坏模式及不同界面应变分布等关键参数进行了分析。研究结果表明:(1)组合结构承载力、应变等指标主要受钢绞线数量控制,受钢锚管直径影响较小。在试验结果范围内,增加一根钢绞线,钢锚管锚索组合结构承载力平均增加276 kN。(2)随钢绞线数量增加,结构破坏模式由局部钢绞线断裂转为多根整体拉断,未出现其他破坏情况,即各界面黏结强度均高于钢绞线极限强度。(3)钢锚管与注浆体及注浆体与围岩界面应变分布基本一致,后者曲线相较于前者,存在一定的“滞后”现象。(4)注浆体杨氏模量、锚固长度以及钢锚管直径的增加,均可有效减小各对应材料的变形。研究结果可为预应力钢锚管-锚索组合结构的工程设计与参数优化提供理论依据。

关键词: 钢锚管锚索, 足尺试验, 承载力, 破坏模式

Abstract:

Currently, the bearing capacity design of prestressed steel anchor pipe-anchor cable composite structures often neglects the mechanical properties of the four constituent materials—cable, grout, steel pipe, and surrounding rock—as well as the interfacial behaviors among them, thereby resulting in theoretical research lagging behind engineering practice. To elucidate the effects of various parameters on the bearing capacity and failure mechanisms of these composite structures, four full-scale experimental tests were conducted, supplemented by numerical simulations. The analyses focused on key parameters including bearing capacity, failure modes, and strain distribution at different interfaces. The results indicate that: 1) The bearing capacity and strain of the composite structure are predominantly governed by the number of steel strands, while the influence of steel pipe diameter is comparatively minor. Within the tested range, adding one steel strand increases the bearing capacity of the steel anchor pipe-cable composite structure by an average of 276 kN. 2) With an increasing number of steel strands, the failure mode transitions from local strand rupture to simultaneous rupture of multiple strands, with no other failure modes observed, indicating that the interface bond strengths all surpass the ultimate tensile strength of the steel strands. 3) The strain distribution patterns at the interfaces between the steel pipe and grout, as well as between the grout and surrounding rock, generally demonstrate structural consistency; however, the latter exhibits a discernible "lag" phenomenon in comparison to the former. 4) Increase in the grout’s elastic modulus, anchorage length, and steel pipe diameter can all effectively reduce the deformation of the corresponding materials.

Key words: steel pipe anchor cable, full-scale test, bearing capacity, failure mode

中图分类号: U416.1+4
[1] 雷勇, 刘政烨, 曹振, 胡伟. 跨越式下伏溶洞排桩桩端极限承载力试验及简化计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(7): 2261-2272.
[2] 蒋亚龙, 周亚风, 徐彭楚璇, 张旗, 邱思宝. 变温−水冷循环作用下极硬花岗岩力学损伤特性及贯入性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(3): 856-868.
[3] 吴金标, 曾柳祁, 江益辉, 槐荣国, 曾程. 不同饱和度砂土中浅埋管道上拔抗力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 209-218.
[4] 鄂天龙, 崔强, 孙志亮, 冯杨州, 李冰臻, 缪栋, 杨健, 苗田, . 新型短柱斜桩复合基础结构优化与承载机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2955-2966.
[5] 王长虹, 蔡德雍, 胡子轩, 杨天笑. 扰动状态下束浆挤扩桩抗拔机制与计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2980-2994.
[6] 张雨坤, 张恒, 李大勇, 项乾, . 桩靴贯入及拔出对邻近吸力基础运动规律和水平承载力的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2325-2338.
[7] 谢宏丽, 周志军, 任玉波, 田叶青, 范经灿. 大直径预应力钢筋混凝土管桩群桩的水平承载性能[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2573-2585.
[8] 陈志波, 陈峰, 翁洋, 曹光伟, 曾旭明, 潘生贵, 杨辉, . 考虑土塞效应的大直径钢管桩竖向承载力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2224-2236.
[9] 刘健, 夏勇, 江权, 陈涛, 贺维国, 范国刚, 熊先涛, 郑虹, . 强烈构造区硬梁包水电站地下洞室群围岩变形破坏特征与泸定地震响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2265-2280.
[10] 储超群, 包兴佳, 毛明发, 吴顺川, 崔贺佳, . 深地灰岩三轴压缩声发射特征及破坏形式试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2049-2061.
[11] 胡伟, 曾攀煜, 王辉, 刘顺凯, 陈秋南, PUIG DAMIANS I, . 黏性土地基中水平条形锚板上拔承载力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1731-1744.
[12] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[13] 汪昕, 幸安康, 曾子强, 姜祎, 徐建宇, 王晓南, 刘造保, . 层理铁矿石剪切力学性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1039-1048.
[14] 杨柳, 杨铎, 何满潮, . 基于纳米划痕的陆相页岩纹层界面过渡区分布范围定量研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 353-367.
[15] 刘润, 许泽伟, 陈广思, 梁超. 饱和软黏土中回型沉垫基础竖向承载特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 381-388.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!