岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (7): 2433-2448.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0630CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0630

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

新型框架预应力T形托定锚加固多级填方边坡地震稳定性实时分析

张俊1,叶帅华1,崔新壮2, 3   

  1. 1.兰州理工大学 土木与水利工程学院,甘肃 兰州 730050;2.重庆大学 土木工程学院,重庆 400045; 3.山东大学 土建与水利学院,山东 济南 250061
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-16 接受日期:2025-10-11 出版日期:2026-07-13 发布日期:2026-07-15
  • 通讯作者: 叶帅华,男,1983年生,博士,教授,主要从事边坡的破坏机制、稳定性和动力响应等方面的研究工作。E-mail: yeshuaihua@163.com
  • 作者简介:张俊,男,1997年生,博士研究生,主要从事支护边坡静动力稳定性方面的研究工作。E-mail: zhangjun9701@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.52168050);甘肃省科技计划项目(No.24JRRA207)。

Real-time seismic stability analysis of multi-stage fill slopes reinforced by novel frame prestressed T-shaped fixed anchors

ZHANG Jun1, YE Shuai-hua1, CUI Xin-zhuang2, 3   

  1. 1. School of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, Gansu 730050, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250061, China
  • Received:2025-06-16 Accepted:2025-10-11 Online:2026-07-13 Published:2026-07-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52168050) and the Gansu Province Science and Technology Plan Project (24JRRA207).

摘要: 针对当前多级高填方边坡加固技术的不足,提出了一种加固效果良好的框架预应力T形托定锚柔性支护结构。首先,根据T形托定锚水平拉拔破坏模式沿埋深方向非对称性分布特点,提出了破坏模式非对称性影响高度lz,构建了T形托定锚水平极限拉拔承载力统一力学计算模型,并利用似黏聚力理论将T形托定锚的锚固作用等效为增大黏聚力Δc。其次,考虑填土的非均质特性和阻尼特性、T形托定锚与土体的协同作用及多级填方边坡的几何特征,采用拟动力法和极限分析上限法提出了地震作用下框架预应力T形托定锚加固多级填方边坡稳定性分析方法。然后,将本方法与试验结果及现有研究成果进行多层次对比分析,验证了所提方法的合理性和可靠性。最后,通过参数分析揭示了填土强度参数、边坡几何参数、支护参数和地震参数对边坡稳定性的影响规律。研究成果可为多级高填方边坡的加固和抗震设计提供技术支撑和理论依据。

关键词: 地震稳定性, 框架预应力T形托定锚, 多级填方边坡, 实时分析, 参数分析

Abstract: To address the limitations of the current reinforcement technology for multi-stage high-fill slopes, this study proposes a novel flexible supporting structure called frame-prestressed T-shaped fixed anchors (FPTA) that achieves superior reinforcement performance. Firstly, based on the asymmetric distribution of the pullout failure mode of the T-shaped anchor along the burial depth, the concept of the asymmetric failure influence height lz is introduced. A unified mechanical model for the horizontal ultimate pullout resistance of the T-shaped anchor is established, and the anchoring action is represented as the additional cohesion Δc based on the pseudo-cohesion theory. Secondly, a seismic stability analysis method for multi-stage fill slope reinforced by FPTA is developed by using the pseudo-dynamic approach combined with the upper-bound limit analysis method. This method considers the inhomogeneous and damping properties of the fill soil, the interaction between the T-shaped anchor and the soil, and the geometric characteristics of the multi-stage slope. Then, the comparative analysis between the proposed method, experimental results, and existing research serves to demonstrate the validity and reliability of this method. Finally, the effects of soil strength parameters, slope geometry parameters, supporting parameters, and seismic parameters on slope stability are elucidated. This study provides technical guidance for multi-stage fill slope reinforcement engineering projects and offers a theoretical basis for the seismic design of multi-stage fill slopes reinforced by FPTA.

Key words: seismic stability, frame-prestressed T-shaped fixed anchors, multi-stage fill slope, real-time analysis, parametric analysis

中图分类号: TU 470
[1] 汪洋, 陈文化. 基于裂隙形状函数的自然环境高温下花岗岩 裂隙尖部非线性温度场[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 267-274.
[2] 胡伟, 朱海涛, 蒋明镜, 李文昊, . 考虑能源土渗透性影响的水合物分解 超孔压特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(10): 2755-2762.
[3] 甘一雄, 吴顺川, 任义, 张光, . 基于声发射上升时间/振幅与平均频率值的花岗岩劈裂破坏评价指标研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2324-2332.
[4] 杨鹏, 蒲诃夫, 宋丁豹. 竖井地基的大应变固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4049-4056.
[5] 崔 臻,盛 谦,冷先伦,罗庆姿,. 地下洞室地震动力响应的岩体结构控制效应[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1811-1824.
[6] 李 磊,蒋明镜,张伏光, . 深部岩石考虑残余强度时三轴试验离散元定量模拟及参数分析[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1082-1090.
[7] 董士杰,魏红卫. 加筋土边坡地震稳定性动点安全系数分析方法[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 543-547.
[8] 项彦勇,任 鹏. 壁面局部接触裂隙岩体水流-传热的一种理论模型及计算分析[J]. , 2014, 35(10): 2845-2854.
[9] 阮晓波 ,孙树林 ,刘文亮 . 锚固岩石边坡地震稳定性拟动力分析[J]. , 2013, 34(S1): 293-300.
[10] 邱清文 ,张文杰 ,程泽海 . 湿润地区垃圾填埋场蒸发蒸腾覆盖层参数分析[J]. , 2012, 33(S1): 283-289.
[11] 靳建明 ,梁仕华 . 成层Gibson地基中单桩沉降的非线性分析[J]. , 2012, 33(6): 1857-1863.
[12] 朱 磊 ,龚晓南 ,邢 伟. 土钉支护基坑抗隆起稳定性计算方法研究[J]. , 2012, 33(1): 167-170.
[13] 周万欢 ,殷建华. 上覆压力和剪胀作用下土钉抗拔的有限元模拟[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 691-0696.
[14] 林宇亮,杨果林,赵炼恒. 地震条件下挡墙后黏性土主动土压力研究[J]. , 2011, 32(8): 2479-2486.
[15] 卢 正 ,姚海林 ,罗海宁 ,杨 洋 ,杨明亮 . 双参数黏弹性地基上连续配筋混凝土路面振动参数分析[J]. , 2008, 29(8): 2177-2182.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!