岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (9): 3124-3140.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.00379CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.00379

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

三峡库区木鱼包滑坡潜在慢速蠕变−快速运动转变机制及动力学模型

秦盼盼1, 2,黄波林1, 2,董星辰1, 2,张鹏1, 2,秦臻1, 2   

  1. 1. 三峡大学 防灾减灾湖北省重点实验室,湖北 宜昌 443002;2. 三峡大学 三峡库区地质灾害教育部重点实验室,湖北 宜昌 443002
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-23 接受日期:2025-12-22 出版日期:2026-09-11 发布日期:2026-09-01
  • 通讯作者: 黄波林,男,1979年生,博士,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事水库地质灾害及涌浪灾害方面的教学与研究工作。 E-mail: bolinhuang@aliyun.com
  • 作者简介:秦盼盼,男,1996年生,博士研究生,主要从事地质灾害及涌浪灾害方面的研究。E-mail: 202308140011003@ctgu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金区域创新发展联合基金项目(No.U23A2045);三峡大学2024年研究生科研创新基金(No.2024BSCX013)。

Potential mechanism and dynamic model for slow-to-fast transition of Muyubao landslide in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China

QIN Pan-pan1, 2, HUANG Bo-lin1, 2, DONG Xing-chen1, 2, ZHANG Peng1, 2, QIN Zhen1, 2   

  1. 1. Hubei Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geological Hazards on Three Gorges Reservoir Area, Ministry of Education, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China
  • Received:2025-09-23 Accepted:2025-12-22 Online:2026-09-11 Published:2026-09-01
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the NSFC Regional Innovation and Development Joint Fund (U23A2045) and the Research and Innovation Foundation Funded Project of China Three Gorges University (2024BSCX013).

摘要:

蠕变向快速运动的转变机制是水库滑坡失稳机制研究中的关键难题之一。滑带土是控制滑坡演化和失稳运动能力的关键。以三峡库区内持续蠕变的巨型顺层滑坡−木鱼包滑坡为对象,对滑带土进行环剪试验表明,残余摩擦系数具有法向应力和剪切速率双重依赖性。低速率下摩擦弱化(指数衰减),超过临界速率(v0 = 3.33×104 m/s)后转为摩擦略强化(对数增长)。摩擦弱化是主导滑坡由缓慢蠕变向快速失稳转变的机制,通过速率提升―摩擦弱化―速率再提升正反馈循环促进加速蠕变。基于此,构建了法向应力、速率相关摩擦特性及孔隙水压力变化的三维条分滑坡动力学模型。研究揭示了木鱼包滑坡的潜在失稳机制,为水库区蠕变型滑坡的速度预测和趋势研判提供了理论支撑。

关键词: 木鱼包滑坡, 滑带土, 环剪试验, 蠕变―快速运动转变机制, 动力学模型

Abstract:

The mechanism governing the transition from creep to rapid movement is a central challenge in understanding the instability of reservoir landslides. This study focuses on the Muyubao landslide, a giant bedding landslide in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area that exhibits persistent creep. This study focuses on the Muyubao landslide, a giant bedding landslide exhibiting persistent creep in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area. A series of ring-shear tests were conducted on the shear-zone soil, revealing that its residual friction coefficient depends on both normal stress and displacement rate. Specifically, friction weakening, characterized by exponential decay, occurred at low displacement rates, whereas slight friction strengthening, characterized by logarithmic increase, emerged when the displacement rate exceeded a critical threshold (v = 3.33 × 10−4 m/s). The research indicate that friction weakening is the dominant mechanism driving the transition from slow creep to catastrophic failure by promoting accelerated creep through a positive feedback loop of “rate increase–friction weakening–further rate increase.” Based on the experimental results, a 3D slice-based dynamic calculation model was established that incorporates normal stress, rate-dependent frictional behavior, and variations in pore water pressure. This study reveals the potential deformation and instability mechanisms of the MYB landslide and provides essential theoretical support for predicting instability velocity and evaluating the movement tendency of creep-type landslides in reservoir areas.

Key words: Muyubao landslide, slip zone soil, ring-shear test, creep-to-fast movement transition mechanism, dynamic model

中图分类号: TU431
[1] 崔雯雯, 董晓强, 尹顺德, 贺高乐, 赵睿阳. 赤泥、钢渣与粉煤灰中硅、铝、钙元素在碱性及硫酸盐环境下的溶解动力学研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(3): 980-992.
[2] 张海燕, 胡新丽, 刘欣宇, 李亚博. 含水率和剪切速率对黏性滑带土剪切行为及损伤演化的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2471-2482.
[3] 张海燕, 胡新丽, 李亚博. 周期性渗流-应力耦合下滑带土的蠕变特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2189-2198.
[4] 孟佳佳, 吴益平, 晏鄂川, 汪洋. 基于荷载-干湿循环耦合试验的三峡库区石龙门滑坡滑带土强度特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1511-1520.
[5] 李泽闯, 张昊, 程培峰, 王艳丽, . 含粗粒滑带土剪切带演化及空间展布规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1067-1080.
[6] 李跃, 徐卫亚, 易魁, 谢伟超, 张强, 孟庆祥, . 堆积体滑带土非饱和-饱和渗透特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1355-1362.
[7] 任三绍, 张永双, 徐能雄, 吴瑞安, 刘筱怡. 含砾滑带土复活启动强度研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 863-873.
[8] 黄智刚, 左清军, 吴立, 陈福榜, 胡圣松, 朱盛, . 水岩作用下泥质板岩软化非线性机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 2931-2942.
[9] 陈琼, 崔德山, 王菁莪, 刘清秉. 不同固结状态下黄土坡滑坡滑 带土的蠕变试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1635-1642.
[10] 谢辉辉, 许振浩, 刘清秉, 胡桂阳, . 干湿循环路径下弱膨胀土峰值及残余强度演化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 245-252.
[11] 周翠英, 黄思宇, 刘镇, 陆仪启, . 红层软岩软化的界面过程及其动力学模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3189-3196.
[12] 邓茂林, 易庆林, 韩蓓, 周剑, 李卓骏, 张富灵, . 长江三峡库区木鱼包滑坡地表变形规律分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3145-3152.
[13] 江强强, 刘路路, 焦玉勇, 王 浩, . 干湿循环下滑带土强度特性与微观结构试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1005-1012.
[14] 陈育民, 陈润泽, 霍正格, . 饱和悬浮塑料砂流动变形可视环剪试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3709-3716.
[15] 崔德山, 陈 琼, 项 伟, 王菁莪, . 黄土坡滑坡饱和滑带土三轴压缩应力松弛试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 209-216.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!