Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 687-694.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0065

• Numerical Analysis • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Investigation of upper bound adaptive finite element method based on second-order cone programming and higher-order element

SUN Rui1, YANG Feng1, YANG Jun-sheng1, ZHAO Yi-ding1, ZHENG Xiang-cou2, LUO Jing-jing1, YAO Jie3   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410075, China; 2. Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands; 3. China Railway Siyuan Survey and Design Group Co., Ltd., Wuhan, Hubei 430063, China
  • Received:2019-01-10 Revised:2019-05-07 Online:2020-02-11 Published:2020-02-14
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Special Fund of Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities for Central South University (2019zzts292), the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFB1302600) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51878669).

Abstract: Upper bound adaptive finite element method based on the six-node triangular high-order element has the advantages of high calculation accuracy and the ability to directly obtain structural failure mechanism from the refined mesh of the computational domain. However, if the linearization method of yield criterion is still used to establish the upper-bound finite element model, the calculation efficiency will be lower. Therefore, based on the previous research, a second-order cone programming method with higher computational efficiency is introduced to improve the computational efficiency of the upper bound finite element method. Upper bound adaptive finite element method based on second-order cone programming and the higher-order element is established. The analyses of slope stability and bearing capacity of strip foundation show that the proposed method improves the calculation efficiency of the upper bound finite element method, and the refined mesh of the computational domain can directly obtain the refine failure mechanism. It is also shown that the calculation time of the proposed method is significantly shorter than that of the linearization method of yield criterion under the same accuracy. Some examples are given in this paper to show the accuracy and effectiveness of the proposed method. This study can provide some references for theoretical research and engineering practice.

Key words: upper bound finite element method, second-order cone programming, higher-order triangular element, mesh adaptation, failure mechanism

CLC Number: 

  • O 241
[1] YANG Xuan-yu, WANG Yong, . Experimental study on shear behavior of regular soil-rock interface considering asperity widths [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 195-204.
[2] TIAN Lei, XIE Qiang, DUAN Jun, TAO Fu-tao, BAN Yu-xin, FU Xiang, YAN Bin-qi. Mechanical characteristics of pile-anchor joints of three-way inclined anchor-short pile foundation under tension [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(1): 278-288.
[3] LI Yong-wei, XU Lin-rong, FU Jin-yang, SHANG Yong-hui, . Seepage failure mechanism of railway subgrade filling materials under train loading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 299-308.
[4] CHEN Lei, ZHANG Qiang, JIA Chao-jun, LEI Ming-feng, HUANG Juan, HU Jing, . Centrifugal modeling and numerical simulation on stability of reservoir bank accumulation slope caused by heavy rainfall [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(5): 1423-1434.
[5] WEI Ming-xing, ZHU Yong-jian, REN Heng, LI Peng, WANG Xi-zhi, WANG Ping, TANG Cheng, . Uniaxial re-bearing mechanical characteristics and failure mechanism of triaxial unloading-damaged sandstone [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(10): 3047-3057.
[6] XIN Chun-lei, YANG Fei, FENG Wen-kai, LI Wen-hui, LIAO Jun. Shattering failure mechanism of step-like bedding rock slope under multi-stage earthquake excitations [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(12): 3481-3494.
[7] TANG Liang, MAN Xiao-feng, CONG Sheng-yi, SI Pan, LING Xian-zhang, ZHANG Xiao-yu, LI Xue-wei, , . Failure mechanism of pile foundations in liquefiable soils under seismic loading: status and challenge [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(10): 2979-2996.
[8] ZHONG Zi-lan, HAN Chun-tang, LI Jin-qiang, ZHAO Xin, MIAO Hui-quan. Ultimate bearing capacity of sand under lateral horizontal movement of shallowly buried pipelines [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(S2): 95-103.
[9] CHENG Jian-long, ZOU Qing-you, YANG Sheng-qi, LI Xiao-zhao, LIANG Quan, QU Lei, MEI Yan, . Simulation of indentation behavior of TBM disc cutter and failure mechanism of hard rock assisted by hydraulic precutting kerfs [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(8): 2317-2326.
[10] ZHANG Jian, QI Rui-yu, ZONG Jing-yao, FENG Tu-gen. Failure mechanism of shield tunnel circumferential excavation face and the influence of the dilatancy effect on the tunnel stability [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(7): 1833-1844.
[11] WANG Gang, SONG Lei-bo, LIU Xi-qi, BAO Chun-yan, LIN Man-qing, LIU Guang-jian, . Shear fracture mechanical properties and acoustic emission characteristics of discontinuous jointed granite [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(6): 1533-1545.
[12] ZHU Xue-liang, SHAO Sheng-jun, SHEN Xiao-jun, SHAO Shuai, LIU Xiao-kang, . Three-dimensional stability limit analysis of cracked loess slopes [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(10): 2735-2743.
[13] WANG Li, LI Gao, CHEN Yong, TAN Jian-min, WANG Shi-mei, GUO Fei, . Field model test on failure mechanism of artificial cut-slope rainfall in Southern Jiangxi [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(3): 846-854.
[14] REN Yi, WU Shun-chuan, GAO Yong-tao, GAN Yi-xiong, . Effect of sensor calibration on moment tensor analysis of granite uniaxial compression [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(2): 451-461.
[15] ZHOU Chao-biao, LIU Dong, JING Qing-hui, . Mechanical properties and failure mechanisms of the rocklike specimens under tension shear effects [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(12): 3335-3344.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!