Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (10): 3355-3364.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.2074

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Shear strength calculation model of rock joints based on three-dimensional morphology of joint surface

JIN Lei-lei, WEI Yu-feng, HUANG Xin, WEI Jie   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection (Chengdu University of Technology), Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, China
  • Received:2019-12-09 Revised:2020-05-21 Online:2020-10-12 Published:2020-11-07
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R & D Program of China (2017YFC1501000) and the Scientific Research Fund of Sichuan Provincial Education Department (18ZA0045).

Abstract: The JRC-JCS model, which is widely used in the field of geotechnical engineering, has the following defects: 1) the two-dimensional joint roughness coefficient (JRC) can’t comprehensively represent the anisotropy of joint surface morphology; 2) the joint compressive strength (JCS) of joint wall can’t entirely reflect the influence of material properties on joint shear mechanical behavior. In this paper, artificial joint samples with natural joint morphology were poured based on three-dimensional laser scanning and three-dimensional printing technology, and shear tests under constant normal stress were carried out. The shear strength model with three-dimensional morphology parameters and tensile strength parameters was established based on the analysis of experiments and theoretical derivations. The impacts of normal stress and three-dimensional morphology of fracture surface on shear strength and dilatancy angle of rock joints were analyzed through laboratory tests and model comparison. The results show that the shear failure of joints is dominated by tension rather than compression. The different three-dimensional morphology causes different initial dilatancy angles. The peak dilatancy angle decreases with the increase of the normal stress. The shear strength of rock joints can be calculated by studying the changes of the peak dilatancy angle.

Key words: joint, shear strength, Barton model, three-dimensional morphology, dilatancy effect

CLC Number: 

  • TU 452
[1] HUANG Man, NING Hao-sheng, HONG Chen-jie, TAO Zhi-gang, LIU Yu-xing, ZHANG He, . Shear behaviors of infilled joints reinforced with second-generation negative Poisson’s ratio bolts [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 131-140.
[2] YANG Xuan-yu, WANG Yong, . Experimental study on shear behavior of regular soil-rock interface considering asperity widths [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 195-204.
[3] FANG Wei, WU Run-feng, ZHOU Chun-mei, . Rankine passive earth pressure of unsaturated soil using envelope shell model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(9): 2885-2893.
[4] SHEN Yang, SHEN Jia-yi, LIANG Hui, FAN Ke-wei. Triaxial tests on simulated calcareous sand based on 3D printing technology [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(8): 2353-2362.
[5] LAO Guo-feng, YANG Jun-sheng, XIE Yi-peng, TANG Chong, XU Zhi-peng, . A peak shear strength model of continuously graded granular soils based on skeleton structure indices [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(8): 2459-2470.
[6] SONG Li-qi, ZHANG Min, XU Xiao, SUN Jing-wen, YU Kui, LI Xin-yao, . Inversion analysis of shield tunnel considering the rotation effect of segment joint based on distributed fiber optic sensing [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(8): 2483-2494.
[7] XU Ming, YUAN Bang-guo, CAI Yu, LIU Xian-shan, GAN Feng-fan, YUAN Dong-hao, . Analysis of stress concentration characteristics at rock joint ends under stress wave disturbance [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(6): 1687-1699.
[8] LUO Zuo-sen, CAO Xu, DENG Hua-feng, YANG Wang, LI Jian-lin, YANG Chao, . Influence of dynamic normal load on shear mechanical properties of limestone joint surface under different water-bearing states [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(6): 1799-1810.
[9] OUYANG Miao, ZHANG Hong-ri, WANG Gui-yao, DENG Ren-rui, GUO Ou, WANG Lei, GAO You, . Optimization of the ratio of expansive soil improved by biological matrix based on response surface method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(5): 1368-1378.
[10] HE Peng, YANG Chuan-xin, SHI Shao-shuai, HU Jie, WU Wei-tao, CHEN Yan, MA Zheng-hu, . Unified quantitative grading method for deconstructing blockiness of tunnel blocks in jointed rock masses and its application [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(4): 1252-1263.
[11] WANG Gui-lin, WANG Li, WANG Run-qiu, REN Jia-shan, . Shear constitutive model of penetrating sawtooth-like joint surface of red sandstone after dry-wet cycles [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(3): 706-720.
[12] ZHENG Lu, CHEN Yuan-rui, WU Yi-han, ZHANG Xue-lue, BI Yu-zhang, . Collision and fragmentation patterns of rockfalls under the influence of joints [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(3): 729-749.
[13] CAO Su-nan, LI Chun-hong, CHEN Yuan-bing, FEI Kang, . Shear characteristics of biomimetic sand-structure interface under cyclic loading conditions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(3): 821-832.
[14] WU Xue-zhen, XIA Ya-xin, LI Da-yong, YOU Xian-hui, SHAN Ning-kang, XIAO Zhen-ke, CHEN Xiang, . Experiment on shear strength of inner interface of a new type stiffened deep mixed pile [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[15] HUANG Ming-hua, ZHONG Yu-xuan, LU Jin-bin, WANG Ke-ping. Deformation analysis of underlying shield tunnel induced by foundation pit excavation based on discontinuous foundation beam model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(2): 492-504.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!