Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (8): 2173-2184.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1873

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Estimation model of limit values of shear strength of root-bearing soil based on interface bonding

XIA Xin1, 2, JIANG Yuan-jun1, SU Li-jun1, MEHTAB Alam1, LI Jia-jia3   

  1. 1. Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Sichuan Agricultural University, Yaan, Sichuan 625014, China
  • Received:2020-12-13 Revised:2021-03-24 Online:2021-08-11 Published:2021-08-16
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41761144077) and the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA 23090202).

Abstract: At present, the quantitative evaluation models of mechanical reinforcement of soil by roots lack consideration of root-soil interface bonding effect. In order to improve the accuracy and applicability of the quantitative model, this study was premised on the widely used Wu model, combined with the failure mode of root system in root-soil, and quantified the bonding effect of interface between root and soil interface by interface bonding strength parameters. Thus, an estimation model of limit values of shear strength of root-bearing soil based on interface bonding was established, which considered the influence of soil stress, root diameter, root length, and initial angle between root and shear direction in root-bearing soil. Furthermore, the comparison of shear strength of root-bearing soil between the measured values of direct shear test and the calculated values of the model showed that the measured values were within the range of the calculated values of the model established in this article. When the angle between the root and the shear direction was 45°, the measured value was close to the maximum value of the model calculation, and when the angle was 90°, the measured value was close to the average value of the limit values of the model calculation. Compared with the calculated value of Wu model, the accuracy of the estimation model established in this article was increased by five times on average. Moreover, the sensitivity analysis of model parameters showed that the additional soil strength provided by roots was greatly affected by the root number parameters, root size parameters and root-soil interface bond strength parameters.

Key words: root-bearing soil, root-soil interface bonding strength, shear strength, mechanical model

CLC Number: 

  • TU 43
[1] YANG Xuan-yu, WANG Yong, . Experimental study on shear behavior of regular soil-rock interface considering asperity widths [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 195-204.
[2] FANG Wei, WU Run-feng, ZHOU Chun-mei, . Rankine passive earth pressure of unsaturated soil using envelope shell model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(9): 2885-2893.
[3] LAO Guo-feng, YANG Jun-sheng, XIE Yi-peng, TANG Chong, XU Zhi-peng, . A peak shear strength model of continuously graded granular soils based on skeleton structure indices [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(8): 2459-2470.
[4] SHEN Yang, SHEN Jia-yi, LIANG Hui, FAN Ke-wei. Triaxial tests on simulated calcareous sand based on 3D printing technology [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(8): 2353-2362.
[5] HU Wei, ZENG Pan-yu, WANG Hui, LIU Shun-kai, CHEN Qiu-nan, PUIG DAMIANS I, . Calculation method of uplift capacity of horizontal strip anchor plate in cohesive soil foundation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(6): 1731-1744.
[6] LUO Zuo-sen, CAO Xu, DENG Hua-feng, YANG Wang, LI Jian-lin, YANG Chao, . Influence of dynamic normal load on shear mechanical properties of limestone joint surface under different water-bearing states [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(6): 1799-1810.
[7] OUYANG Miao, ZHANG Hong-ri, WANG Gui-yao, DENG Ren-rui, GUO Ou, WANG Lei, GAO You, . Optimization of the ratio of expansive soil improved by biological matrix based on response surface method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(5): 1368-1378.
[8] ZHOU Guang-yuan, GAN Fei, ZHENG Gang, ZHOU Hai-zuo, WANG Hong, BI Jing, LIU Biao, ZHANG Yuan-yin, . Calculation method of negative skin friction for end-bearing piles based on soil deformation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(3): 930-942.
[9] CAO Su-nan, LI Chun-hong, CHEN Yuan-bing, FEI Kang, . Shear characteristics of biomimetic sand-structure interface under cyclic loading conditions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(3): 821-832.
[10] WU Xue-zhen, XIA Ya-xin, LI Da-yong, YOU Xian-hui, SHAN Ning-kang, XIAO Zhen-ke, CHEN Xiang, . Experiment on shear strength of inner interface of a new type stiffened deep mixed pile [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[11] WANG Jun, ZHANG Kai-yu, CHEN Sheng-kai, QIN Wei, NI Jun-feng, GAO Zi-yang, ZHANG Yi-fang, . Experimental study on explosive deposition depth affecting soil parameters in explosion replacement method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(1): 123-132.
[12] LIU Ji-fu. A new method for analyzing stability of drainage consolidation embankments [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 106-114.
[13] ZHANG Ya-qin, YANG Ping, ZHANG Ting, HAN Lin-liang. Effects of salt content and freeze-thaw conditions on static and dynamic strength characteristics of freeze-thawed chloride silty clay [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 157-166.
[14] ZHANG Hua-jin, WU Shun-chuan, LI Bing-lei, ZHAO Yu-song, . Uncertainty estimation of rock shear strength parameters based on Gaussian process regression [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 415-423.
[15] ZHU Jun-yu, PEI Li-hua, GUI Yue, . Reconceptualization of the shear strength of organic soils: based on the perception of soil organic matter occurrence forms [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 451-460.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!