Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (8): 2207-2214.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0118

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Vector sum analysis method for slope stability based on new main sliding trend direction

CHEN Dong, LI Hong-jun, ZHU Kai-bin   

  1. China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100048, China
  • Received:2021-01-20 Revised:2021-03-25 Online:2021-08-11 Published:2021-08-16
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Project(2017YFC0404904)and the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51579033, 51509272).

Abstract: The key to solving the safety factor of the vector sum method lies in determining the real stress state and the main sliding trend direction of the slope. The safety factor obtained by the vector sum method is closely related to the real stress state of the slope and the final sliding trend direction. The existing vector sum method is mostly based on a single anti-slide force or sliding force to determine the main sliding trend direction of the landslide. However, since slope sliding is actually the result of the combined action of the anti-slide force and the sliding force, the combined action of the two needs to be considered in the definition of the main sliding trend direction. In this study, we take the whole landslide body as an analysis object and the main sliding trend direction is first determined based on the overall vector resultant direction of the external load of the isolation body, the normal force, and the ultimate anti-sliding force at the bottom of the sliding body. After that, the safety factor of the landslide body is determined by the definition of the safety factor of the vector sum method. Finally, with the theoretical derivation and verification of standard test questions, the most dangerous sliding surface position, safety factor, and main sliding trend direction derived based on the new main sliding trend direction are comparable with those of the conventional slope stability method. What’s more, the slope safety evaluation based on the new main sliding trend direction are more safe, and more convenient for engineers to take more targeted slope support strategies.

Key words: slope stability, vector sum method, safety factor, main sliding trend direction

CLC Number: 

  • TU 42
[1] DENG Qi-ning, CUI Yu-long, WANG Jiong-chao, ZHENG Jun, XU Chong, . ChatGPT-assisted programming approach for three-dimensional slope stability calculation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 322-334.
[2] XU Quan, HOU Jing, YANG Jian, YANG Xin-guang, NI Shao-hu, CHEN Xin. Fine stability analysis of rock slope based on synthetic rock mass technology [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(7): 2062-2070.
[3] DENG Dong-ping, XU Run-dong, PENG Yi-hang, WEN Sha-sha. Limit equilibrium method based on mode of slip surface stress analysis for slope stability under the characteristics of spatial heterogeneity and anisotropy in soil strength [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(1): 55-72.
[4] LIN Bin-qiang, ZHANG De-sheng, JIAN Wen-bin, DOU Hong-qiang, WANG Hao, FAN Xiu-feng, . Response of vegetated slope stability under wind-driven rain conditions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(9): 2765-2774.
[5] XIAO Ming-qing, XU Chen, CUI Lan, SHENG Qian, CHEN Jian, XIE Bi-ting, YAN Qing-ming, . Experimental study on bearing capacity of systematic bolt support based on total safety factor method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(6): 1743-1754.
[6] LIU Wei, XU Chang-jie, DU Hao-dong, ZHU Huai-long, WANG Chang-hong. Stability analysis of overconsolidated unsaturated red clay slope based on modified UH model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(4): 1233-1241.
[7] THENDAR Yoshua, LIM Aswin. Investigation into RFD system for deep excavation considering diaphragm wall joints [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(12): 3717-3727.
[8] DENG Dong-ping, PENG Yi-hang, LIU Meng-qi, LI Yuan-yuan. Limit equilibrium method for analyzing slope stability with nonlinear failure characteristics considering the coupling relationship of polar diameter, stress, and strength of the slip surface [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(11): 3235-3258.
[9] FENG Song, ZHENG Ying-ren, GAO Hong, . A new Drucker-Prager criterion for geomaterials under conventional triaxial stress condition [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(10): 2919-2928.
[10] QU Xiao-lei, ZHANG Yun-kai, CHEN You-ran, CHEN You-yang, QI Cheng-zhi, . Stability analysis of fractured rock slope based on seepage-deformation coupling model using numerical manifold method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(1): 313-324.
[11] ZHOU Xiao-min, MA Wen-zhu, ZHANG Song, SONG Yi-xiang, LIU Yong, HE Xiao-nan, . Analytical method for surrounding rock reinforced by bolts-grouting in tunnel under seepage [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(S1): 206-220.
[12] XIAO Guo-feng. An improved overload limit equilibrium method of rock blocks [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(2): 425-432.
[13] LI Yu-ting, CHEN Xiao-bin, HE Peng-peng, . Reliability of offshore plate anchor design in sand for uplift limit state [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(12): 3495-3500.
[14] ZHANG Wen-lian, SUN Xiao-yun, CHEN Yong, JIN Shen-yi, . Slope stability analysis method based on compressive strength reduction of rock mass [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(S2): 607-615.
[15] SADEGHI Hamed, KOLAHDOOZ Ali, AHMADI Mohammad-Mehdi. Slope stability of an unsaturated embankment with and without natural pore water salinity subjected to rainfall infiltration [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(8): 2136-2148.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!