Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6): 1469-1480.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1480

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Spacing ratio of structural loess and its prediction using bounding surface plasticity model

KANG Xiao-sen1, LIAO Hong-jian2, HUANG Qiang-bing1, HUO Bing-yao1   

  1. 1. Department of Geological Engineering, Chang’an University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710054, China; 2. Department of Civil Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710049, China
  • Received:2021-09-02 Revised:2022-03-11 Online:2022-06-21 Published:2022-06-29
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (42102317, 42041006, 51879212) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, CHD (300102261303).

Abstract: The critical state of structural loess is related to its initial void ratio, which causes the non-unique critical state line that can be described by an index “spacing ratio”. However, Modified Cam-clay model and its enhanced models show unique critical state line, which make it unable to capture the critical state and strain-softening of intact loess. To solve the issue, this paper conducts the investigation for the spacing ratio of intact loess and model prediction for the mechanical behaviors of intact loess. Firstly, the calculation method of the spacing ratio is given, and the values of the spacing ratio corresponding to different void ratios are calculated from triaxial undrained compression test results on intact loess. It was found that there exists an inversely proportional relationship between the spacing ratio and the void ratio. The physical meaning of the spacing ratio is also clarified. Secondly, a modified model is obtained by introducing a hardening parameter into a framework of structure bounding surface plasticity model considering spacing ratio. In the modified model, the various values of spacing ratio represent non-unique critical state line, and the structural decay of intact loess is accomplished by coupling the effect of plastic deviatoric strain and plastic volumetric strain. The modified model well predicts the critical state, strain-softening, stress paths, and pore pressure of intact loess. The above results show that the physical meaning of the spacing ratio is clear, and its role in predicting critical state is reliable. If the spacing ratio is considered in a constitutive model, it can well capture the critical state of intact loess. The conclusions have theoretical and practical meanings for numerical analysis of geotechnical engineering in loess area.

Key words: loess, spacing ratio, bounding surface plasticity, constitutive model, structure

CLC Number: 

  • TU444
[1] ZHI Bin, WEI Yuan-jun, WANG Pan, ZHANG Qian, LIU Cun-li, REN Hui-ming, . Correlation mechanism between macroscopic strength and microstructure of undisturbed loess containing Na2SO4 salt under freeze-thaw cycles [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 106-120.
[2] ZHANG Xing-wen, CAO Jing, LEI Shu-yu, LI Yu-hong, CHENG Yun, ZHANG Ning-rui. Effect of fulvic acid environment on the structure and permeability of cement-soil containing humic acid [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 249-261.
[3] HOU Ke-peng, JIANG Fan, ZHANG Chao, GONG Jing-han, . Surface morphology effect of soil-rock mixture-bedrock interface shear [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 271-284.
[4] ZHANG Xian-cheng, CHI Bao-tao, YU Xian-ze, GUO Qian-jian, YUAN Wei, ZHANG Yao-ming, . Unstructured mesh generation and fracture damage analysis in the implementation of peridynamics-based finite element method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 467-476.
[5] NIE Yao-wu, HU Bing, GU Lei-yu, LI Bin, ZHOU Quan-chao, LI Wen-hui, LI Qi, LI Xia-ying, . Numerical simulation on safety risk assessment of coal mining with CO2 geological storage [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 491-506.
[6] ZHAO Kai, MA Hong-ling, SHI Xi-lin, LI Yin-ping, YANG Chun-he, . Long-term stability assessment of salt caverns for compressed air energy storage based on creep-fatigue constitutive model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 1-12.
[7] WU Zi-long, YU Tao, YAN Chao, DENG Yong-feng, HU Guang-qing, GAO Yu-hang, WANG Zhang, WANG Li, . Analysis of loess heavy metal pollution in Shaanxi Province and a preliminary study on treatment of loess/bentonite cutoff walls [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(9): 2738-2748.
[8] ZHANG Miao, LI Lin, ZHENG Han-bo, LI Pan-pan, . Elastoplastic model of structural loess considering influence of saturation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(9): 2816-2824.
[9] QU Jun-tong, SHI Qi-zhuang, GUO Ying-jie, ZHANG Xiang, LIU Yi, JIANG De-yang. Characteristics and damage mechanisms of ice deposits under freeze-thaw cycles [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(9): 2859-2872.
[10] E Tian-long, CUI Qiang, SUN Zhi-liang, FENG Yang-zhou, LI Bing-zhen, MIAO Dong, YANG Jian, MIAO Tian, . Structure optimization and bearing mechanism of a novel composite foundation incorporating short column-batter piles [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(9): 2955-2966.
[11] LI Lin, JI Liang, YE Fei, LI Yao, . A hydro-mechanical coupling elastoplastic constitutive model for unsaturated intact structured loess [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(8): 2421-2433.
[12] LAO Guo-feng, YANG Jun-sheng, XIE Yi-peng, TANG Chong, XU Zhi-peng, . A peak shear strength model of continuously graded granular soils based on skeleton structure indices [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(8): 2459-2470.
[13] LI Xiao-jun, ZHANG Yu-xiao, RONG Mian-shui, NI Ping-he. Bayesian inversion method for soil layer velocity structure and its application [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(7): 2237-2254.
[14] YANG Ai-wu, CHENG Shu-xiao, LIANG Zhen-zhen, HUA Qian-qian, YANG Shao-peng. Combined effects of large-strain consolidation and creep in high-moisture dredger fill [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(7): 1977-1987.
[15] HAN Shi-ying, WANG Hang-long, PENG Jun, ZHU Jun-xing, WANG Lin-fei, PAN Kun, . Experimental investigation on influence of structural plane on rockburst characteristics of hard surrounding rock in a deep-buried tunnel [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(6): 1765-1776.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!