Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6): 1738-1748.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1529

• Testing Technology • Previous Articles    

Application and comparison of sensor calibration methods based on moment tensor inversion

REN Yi1, GAO Yong-tao1, WU Shun-chuan1, 2, LI Dong-dong1   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Efficient Mining and Safety of Metal Mine, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China; 2. Faculty of Land Resource Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan 650093, China
  • Received:2021-09-08 Revised:2022-03-03 Online:2022-06-21 Published:2022-06-30
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51774020, 51934003) and the Program for Innovative Research Team (in Science and Technology) in Universities of Yunnan Province.

Abstract: Moment tensor inversion is an effective method to study the mechanism of deep rock mass failure, and station/sensor calibration is very important for obtaining accurate moment tensors. In order to obtain more accurate sensor calibration coefficients and moment tensors, a new sensor calibration method is developed: the search calibration method. The proposed method and the network calibration method are respectively applied to the microseismic monitoring data of the Geysers geothermal field in northern California. Then, based on the calibration results, a series of theoretical calculations and simulations are conducted to verify the effectiveness of the two different calibration methods. By comprehensively considering the influence of factors such as different focal mechanism parameters, preset calibration coefficients, noise addition methods and noise levels, the theoretical calculation and simulation analysis of the effectiveness comparison of calibration methods are carried out. The results show that both calibration methods can obtain stable coefficients from microseismic monitoring data, the components and stress state distribution of events are more concentrated after calibration; under all simulated conditions, the two calibration methods can effectively reduce the moment tensor errors; under low noise level condition, the moment tensor errors of two calibration methods are very small and similar; under mixed noise level and high noise level conditions, the accuracy and stability of the search calibration results are better than that of network calibration in most cases; based on the simulation results, the more reliable moment tensors of the Geysers microseismic data are selected. The research ideas and conclusions can provide further guidance for the study of microseismic moment tensor.

Key words: moment tensor inversion, sensor calibration, microseismic, focal mechanism, noise

CLC Number: 

  • TU457
[1] ZHENG Pei-xiao, PU Cheng-zhi, XIE Guo-sen, LUO Yong, LI Guang-yue, . Automatic identification of mine microseismic signals based on feature selection [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(7): 2199-2210.
[2] WANG Xiao-min, QU Jun-li, SHI Ya-ping. A microseismic P-wave arrival time picking method based on variance surge effect of autoregressive model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(4): 1335-1342.
[3] JIA Bao-xin, ZHAI Zi-wei, ZHANG Jing, ZHOU Zhi-yang, YUAN Wen-ya, ZHENG Ke-nan, . Time-frequency and attenuation analysis of shallow tunnel high-speed railway vibration signal based on high-order local maximum synchrosqueezing transform [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(1): 337-352.
[4] SUN Jia-hao, WANG Wen-jie, XIE Lian-ku, . Short-term rockburst prediction model based on microseismic monitoring and probability optimization naive Bayes [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(6): 1884-1894.
[5] JIA Bao-xin, ZHENG Ke-nan, ZHOU Lin-li, . Energy attenuation patterns of microseismic signals in the "three zones" of goaf based on variational mode decomposition [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(4): 991-1002.
[6] WANG Hong-zhen, ZHANG Chun-sheng, HUANG Wei, GUO De-chang, JIANG Jian-qun, . Vibration characteristics of super large centrifuge foundation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(7): 1942-1950.
[7] ZHANG Hua-jin, WU Shun-chuan, HAN Long-qiang, . Dominant partitioning method of rock mass discontinuity based on DBSCAN selective clustering ensemble [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(6): 1585-1595.
[8] JIA Bao-xin, LI Feng, PAN Yi-shan, ZHOU Lin-li, . Microseismic source locating method based on variable step size accelerated search [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(3): 843-856.
[9] REN Yi, GAO Yong-tao, WU Shun-chuan, LI Dong-dong, GAN Yi-xiong, . Moment tensor inversion of Brazilian splitting test on granite [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(1): 235-245.
[10] WU Zhen-hua, PAN Peng-zhi, PAN Jun-feng, WANG Zhao-feng, GAO Jia-ming, . Analysis of mechanism of rock burst and law of mining induced events in graben structural area [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(8): 2225-2238.
[11] LIU Yin-chi, LI Shu-lin, TANG Chao. Improvement and application of focal mechanism solution type criterion for rock mass fracture [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(5): 1335-1344.
[12] REN Yi, WU Shun-chuan, GAO Yong-tao, GAN Yi-xiong, . Effect of sensor calibration on moment tensor analysis of granite uniaxial compression [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(2): 451-461.
[13] MAO Hao-yu, XU Nu-wen, LI Biao, FAN Yi-lin, WU Jia-yao, MENG Guo-tao, . Stability analysis of an underground powerhouse on the left bank of the Baihetan hydropower station based on discrete element simulation and microseismic monitoring [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2470-2484.
[14] CHEN Bing-rui, FENG Xia-ting, FU Qi-qing, WANG Bo, ZHU Xin-hao, LI Tao, LU Cai-ping, XIA Huan, . Integration and high precision intelligence microseismic monitoring technology and its application in deep rock engineering [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2422-2431.
[15] CHEN Bing-rui, WU Hao, CHI Xiu-wen, LIU Hui, WU Meng-die, YAN Jun-wei, . Real-time recognition algorithm for microseismic signals of rock failure based on STA/LTA and its engineering application [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(9): 3689-3696.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!