Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 1849-1862.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1023

• Numerical Analysis • Previous Articles    

Discrete element simulation on aeolian sand-geogrid pull-out test with different boundary conditions

DU Wei1, NIE Ru-song1, 2, LI Lie-lie3, TAN Yong-chang1, ZHANG Jie1, QI Yan-lu4   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410075, China; 2. MOE Key Laboratory of Engineering Structures of Heavy Haul Railway, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410075, China; 3. College of Water Resources and Hydropower, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, Henan 450045, China; 4. Xinjiang Railway Survey and Design Institute Co., Ltd., Urumqi, Xinjiang 830011, China
  • Received:2022-07-04 Accepted:2022-09-13 Online:2023-06-14 Published:2023-06-17
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Scientific and Technological Research and Development Program of China Railway Urumqi Bureau Group Co., Ltd. (WLMQ-KGHZGS-HRTL-GGB-2020-0032), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51878666) and the National Engineering Laboratory of High-speed Railway Construction Technology Open Fund Project (HSR201905).

Abstract:

The boundary and loading device of the physical model of laboratory geogrid pull-out tests are usually rigid, but the boundary conditions of the geogrid in engineering application cannot always correspond to the physical model boundary of laboratory pull-out test. In order to study the effect of boundary conditions on the pull-out test results, this paper uses three-dimensional discrete element method to carry out numerical simulation on the pull-out tests of geogrid-reinforced aeolian sand based on the laboratory triaxial and pull-out tests. The effects of four combination conditions, namely rigid top surface and rigid front wall (RTRP), flexible top surface and rigid front wall (FTRP), rigid top surface and flexible front wall (RTFP), and flexible top surface and flexible front wall (FTFP), on the macroscopic and mesoscopic characteristics of reinforced soil interface are studied. The relationship between pull-out force and pull-out displacement, interface shear strength, force chain, porosity distribution and particle rotation law were analyzed under different combination conditions. The displacement of rigid loading plate and flexible boundary particles, the deformation of geogrids under FTFP combination, and the evolution law of shear band during pull-out were examined. The results show that the rigid and flexible boundary of the front wall of the model has a great influence on the pull-out force curve pattern and interface friction angle. Under rigid front wall boundary conditions, the pull-out force and displacement curves are machining softening, while the pull force and displacement curves are approximately double-folded under the boundary condition of flexible front wall. When the front wall of the model changes from rigid to flexible, the friction angle of the interface decreases by 7º− 8º. When the normal pressure is less than 90 kPa, it is suggested that the peak reduction coefficients of the FTRP combination, RTFP combination and FTFP combination should be 0.9, 0.6 and 0.7, respectively. In the process of pull-out test, the specimen volumes under the four combinations expand and show dilatancy. The shear band thickness distributions of RTRP and FTRP are 5.38 and 10.79 times of the medium particle diameter. The shear bands of RTFP and FTFP have a wider distribution range. The research results are helpful to further reveal the interaction mechanism between geogrid and aeolian sand under rigid and flexible loading modes as well as rigid and flexible front wall boundary.

Key words: pull-out test, boundary conditions, discrete element method, aeolian sand

CLC Number: 

  • TU411
[1] MIAO Ri-cheng, TANG Bei, QI Fei, JIANG Zhi-an, CUI Wei, . Discrete element method simulation of rock breaking by tunnel boring machine disc cutter considering the effects of random fractures [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 541-552.
[2] SUN Chuang, PU Yun-bo, AO Yun-he, TAO Qi, . Mechanical properties of freeze-thaw water-saturated fissured sandstone and its characterization of fine-scale fracture evolution [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(8): 2339-2352.
[3] LAO Guo-feng, YANG Jun-sheng, XIE Yi-peng, TANG Chong, XU Zhi-peng, . A peak shear strength model of continuously graded granular soils based on skeleton structure indices [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(8): 2459-2470.
[4] WU Lin-yu, MIAO Lin-chang, SUN Xiao-hao, . Effect of polyacrylamide on sand solidification using enzyme-induced carbonate precipitation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(5): 1573-1580.
[5] JIN Lei, LI Jing-jing, LI Xin-ming, SUN Han-qing, . Finite difference method-discrete element method simulation of flexible boundary conditions and their influence on the drained and undrained triaxial shear behavior of sands [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(3): 980-990.
[6] YAO Jia-nan, XU Chang-jie, CHI Min-liang, WANG Yan-ping, XI Yue-lai, WANG Wei-feng, FENG Guo-hui, SUN Jia-zheng, . Discrete element simulation and theoretical study on non-limit active earth pressure of rigid retaining wall under RBT mode [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(2): 640-652.
[7] YANG Song, WANG Jun-guang, WEI Zhong-gen, XIN Tian-yu, LIANG Bing, WANG Li-xuan, REN Ling-ran. Preliminary study on creep characteristics and model of sandstone under attenuated oscillation disturbance [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(11): 3485-3500.
[8] WANG Hui, NIU Xin-qiang, MA Gang, ZHOU Wei, . Discrete element simulation study on the macro- and meso-mechanical properties of rockfill materials under wetting-drying cycles [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 665-676.
[9] LIU Zong-qi, CHEN Xi, CUI Liu-sheng, TANG Jian-bin. Porosity field measurement technique for shear band width in direct shear and biaxial discrete element numerical experiments [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 742-750.
[10] ZHANG Dong-mei, ZHANG Xue-liang, DU Wei-wei, . Discrete element method based investigation on displacement and bearing characteristics of pile foundation under seepage erosion [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(4): 1181-1189.
[11] MAO Jia, YU Jian-kun, SHAO Lin-yu, ZHAO Lan-hao. Discrete element method based on three dimensional deformable spheropolyhedra [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(3): 908-916.
[12] JIA Chao-jun, PANG Rui-feng, YU Jun, LEI Ming-feng, LI Zhong, . Investigation on freeze-thaw damage mechanism of porous rock with discrete element method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(2): 588-600.
[13] YANG Yang, WANG Le, MA Jian-hua, TONG Chen-xi, ZHANG Chun-hui, WANG Zhi-chao, TIAN Ying-hui, . Mechanism of submarine pipeline penetration into calcareous sand considering particle breakage effect [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(2): 623-632.
[14] JIN Lei, YE Yang, WANG Yu, LI Jing-jing, . Mechanism of the rolling resistance effect on triaxial shear behavior of granular medium [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(12): 3779-3790.
[15] LIANG Jin-ping, JING Hao-yong, HOU Gong-yu, LI Xiao-rui, ZHANG Ming-lei, . Meso-damage and mechanical characteristics of surrounding rock under unloading condition [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(S1): 399-409.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!